Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

WP 10 ATF meeting April 8, 2002 Data Management and security requirements of biomedical applications Johan Montagnat - WP10.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "WP 10 ATF meeting April 8, 2002 Data Management and security requirements of biomedical applications Johan Montagnat - WP10."— Presentation transcript:

1 WP 10 ATF meeting April 8, 2002 Data Management and security requirements of biomedical applications Johan Montagnat - WP10

2 WP 10 ATF April 8, 2002, J. Montagnat, WP10 Data u Public biological data n Genomics databases such as SwissProt, TrEMBL, yeast genome…, usually available through web portals u private biological data n Databases owned by private companies, usually disconnected from the outside world. In a grid context they should not be accessible to any system administrator. u Medical data n Every data is protected. Nominative data are only accessible to a very limited number of persons. Images contain both nominative and anonymous data. u No well established standard format / no standard data structure n flat files for biological data n DICOM3 for medical images

3 WP 10 ATF April 8, 2002, J. Montagnat, WP10 Users u Public n Anybody an access public databases in read-only mode. u Owners n A limited number of users can modify/update data. u Patients (individuals) n A patient has free access to its medical data. u Physicians (groups) n A physician has complete read access to its patients data. Few persons have read/write access. u Researchers (groups) n Researcher may obtain read access to anonymous medical data for research purposes. Nominative data should be blanked before transmission to these users.

4 WP 10 ATF April 8, 2002, J. Montagnat, WP10 Data management requirements u Data requirements n Very large databases (Tb/database) n Long term storage u Biological data n Frequent data updates n Data indexing (c.f. BLAST) n versioning (CVS-like) mechanism needed to restore older data version u Medical data n Metadata storage (information on patient, acquisition type, medical file…) n Access right on a medical department (group) basis n Read-only access to raw scanner data, R/W to processed data n Record data processing

5 WP 10 ATF April 8, 2002, J. Montagnat, WP10 Use cases u Web portal access to public data n e.g. NPS@ web portal u Private access to public biological data n A private database is compared against a public database. The kind of research should not be known from the outside. u Private biological data n data are only available from, and can only be replicated to, an limited number of resources u Queries on medical databases n A physician retrieves all images from a patient n A researcher assess an algorithm on a dataset obtained by querying the data storage system on non nominative metadata

6 WP 10 ATF April 8, 2002, J. Montagnat, WP10 Use cases u Delegation of credential n A physician needs the expert advise of a colleague. He grants access to some image. He could not have grant access to a non accredited user. u Patient access to its data n A patient can query its data, meaning that he can query a database on nominative data, only for data he owns.

7 WP 10 ATF April 8, 2002, J. Montagnat, WP10 Security requirements u Security is a central issue for a large scale deployment of WP10 applications n sensitive data should not be accessible by third parties (encryption is one mean). u Data access security n Read-only access for most users n No read access to private data by any third party user (including system administrators) n The replication mechanism should not make replicated data more accessible than masters n Quoting D7.5: “it should be difficult for someone to make sensitive data accessible to non accredited users” n Sensitive data should not be accessible while being transmitted over the network (secured/encrypted protocols needed)

8 WP 10 ATF April 8, 2002, J. Montagnat, WP10 Security requirements u Biological data security issues n An explicit control of sites where private data may be replicated should be possible n A third party should not be able to know what is done with the data (impossible to log other users jobs on the grid) u Medical data security issues n Image nominative metadata should be stored in secured/trusted databases n Nominative metadata should be encrypted when transmitted over the network n Images should not be replicated outside hospital without blanking headers n It should be possible for an accredited user to delegate access right for some data to another accredited user.

9 WP 10 ATF April 8, 2002, J. Montagnat, WP10 Raid 5 Client DICOM Server DICOM DICOM jE cache Hospital Meta Data jE jE: an interface to medical data servers

10 WP 10 ATF April 8, 2002, J. Montagnat, WP10 Foreseen medical data infrastructure u Split nominative and anonymous data to allow data replication on unsecured sites. Untrusted data servers with blanked images jE Authentication and Authorization Metadata interface SE-DICOM interface Confidential data Non-confidential data Header blanking hospital SE DICOM Server SE European DataGrid

11 qmsg/shm LAN WAN SE Interface jE/SE Interface hdS jE User Interface jE Dicon Client jE Dicon Server spitfire security (GSI) jE Cache hdS OK phase 1 phase 2 jE Spitfire Int ATF April 8, 2002, H. Duque, WP10 Detailed jE architecture

12 ATF April 8, 2002, H. Duque, WP10 TCP / IP hdS dicom Srv jEdi spitfire jE hdS Daemons ( metadata; jE; images ) jEspi jEcache http http/xml jEus.php TCP / IP SE jEse image Srv jE communication layer

13 WP 10 ATF April 8, 2002, J. Montagnat, WP10 Questions to WP2 u How to interface the jE with Spitfire ? n jwget is a command line tool... n Should we wait for an API ? n Should we use direct XSQL queries through HTTP ? n Which port? u We need a jE User Interface (to query both local and remote Spitfire databases). What protocol should we use? n Http via tomcat server? s Could Spitfire tomcat server be reused? n Are there any plan to distribute spitfire? n Should we use our own protocol? u Should a jE manage its own RC to make its medical files visible to the outside world?

14 ATF April 8, 2002, H. Duque, WP10 jE/SE interaction

15 WP 10 ATF April 8, 2002, J. Montagnat, WP10 Questions to WP5 u How to interface a jE as an SE? n Should we consider the jE as a MSS? n What is the SE interface? n What is a SE? u Which API should use the SE client? n RB, RM, JSS, IS, communicate with SEs... n Will there be a user application API? n Will jE be considered like a user application?


Download ppt "WP 10 ATF meeting April 8, 2002 Data Management and security requirements of biomedical applications Johan Montagnat - WP10."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google