Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Status of ITER collaboration for Machine Protection I. Romera On behalf of the colleagues who contribute to the project Thanks to: Sigrid, Markus, Rüdiger,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Status of ITER collaboration for Machine Protection I. Romera On behalf of the colleagues who contribute to the project Thanks to: Sigrid, Markus, Rüdiger,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Status of ITER collaboration for Machine Protection I. Romera On behalf of the colleagues who contribute to the project Thanks to: Sigrid, Markus, Rüdiger, Manuel, Jonathan et all…

2 Outline  Introduction  Magnet Powering Layout  Current activities ongoing  Next milestones

3 Facts Q ≥ 10 (500 MW) 840m 3 of plasma 150M °C 23000 Tons 12.8 Billion Euros 34 nations ITER Tokamak

4 CERN-ITER agreement  Agreement nº 7 of 2007 cooperation between ITER and CERN  4 tasks:  Consultancy for the set up of a MPWG  Definition of overall architecture of Machine Protection and Central Interlock System  Specifications for the fault scenario simulations  Definition of tools for diagnostics

5 Outline  Introduction  Magnet Powering Layout  Current activities ongoing  Next steps

6 Magnet Powering Layout Toroidal Field coils  Plasma confinement  18 coils / 1 circuit  Stored energy = 41 GJ  Nominal current = 68 kA

7 Magnet Powering Layout Poloidal Field coils  Keep plasma away from walls  6 coils / 6 circuits  Stored energy = 4 GJ  Nominal current = 48 kA

8 Magnet Powering Layout Central Solenoid coils  Induce plasma current by changing current in the CS  6 coils / 5 circuits  Stored energy = 6 GJ  Nominal current = 45 kA

9 Magnet Powering Layout Corrector coils  Compensation of errors in confining magnetic field  18 coils / 9 circuits  Stored energy = 2 GJ  Nominal current = 10 kA

10 Magnet powering layout

11 Outline  Introduction  Magnet Powering Layout  Current activities ongoing  Next steps

12  Functional specification of necessary logic in CIS for magnet powering protection  3 levels of protection:  Circuit level  Family level  Global level  Defining dependability level for each IPF  Includes fault tree representations of IPF Activities ongoing – IPF

13  Circuit level IPF CF-QFCPA Quench in any circuit has to result in: Opening of all FDUs: o Case of the Toroidal Field Circuit at least 7oo9 o No action (no FDUs) in the case of Corrector Coils Fast Power Abort of the corresponding Power Converter Fast Discharge Request detected by PC, CIS and FDUs Inhibit Start of Powering/next plasma discharge Inform PCS to start Plasma ramp down/disruption mitigation A FDU spurious opening in any circuit (no action in case of Corrector Coil circuits) result in the same procedure as above. A CIS Fast Discharge Request has to result in the same actions as in the case of Quench. A Power Converter Fast Discharge Request has to result in the same actions as in the case of Quench Required SIL level SIL 3 equivalent. Direct hardwired loop, daisy chaining all involved user systems (quench loop)

14 Activities ongoing – IPF  Family level IPF CF-QFCPA Quench in any circuit of a family has to result in: Opening of all FDUs for the family of circuits considering: o No action (no FDUs) in the case of Corrector Coils Fast Power Abort of the Power Converters for all circuits of the corresponding family Fast Discharge Request detected by PC, CIS and FDUs Inhibit Start of Powering/next plasma discharge Inform PCS to start Plasma ramp down/disruption mitigation A FDU spurious opening in any family of circuits (no action in case of Corrector Coil circuits) result in the same procedure as above. A CIS Fast Discharge Request has to result in the same actions as in the case of Quench. A Power Converter Fast Discharge Request has to result in the same actions as in the case of Quench Required SIL level SIL 2 equivalent. ‘Configurable’ function implemented in Safety PLC and probably additional redundant HW module.

15 Activities ongoing – IPF  Global level IPF GF-CR2A less critical failure in the Cryogenics system due to a for instance an unbalanced coil cool down distribution implies: Inhibit Start for all the circuits of all families Slow Abort of the Power Converters for all circuits of all families Inform PCS to start Plasma ramp down/disruption mitigation Required SIL level SIL 2 equivalent. Hardware signal exchange with safety PLC I/O

16  Functional specification of signal exchange between clients  Dependability requirements for different signals types  Transmission type and architecture  Electrical properties of interfaces and connections (interface box, safety PLC I/O) Activities ongoing – Hardware interfaces

17

18  Fast discharges in magnet coils limited to ~50 during ITER life (real+false)  To ensure investment protection, CIS design must not only account for high level of safety, but also for high availability (to limit mechanical stress)  Studies confirmed 2oo3 architecture as the best candidate to meet dependability requirements Activities ongoing – Dependability studies Courtesy of S.Wagner Quench Loop Interface (voting fault-free) Interface with loop components (voting fault-free)

19 Activities ongoing – Dependability studies Interface with voting component Courtesy of S.Wagner Interface with redundant voting component  Series of quantitative studies performed on architecture of  Quench Loop  Interface with fault-free voting  Interface with voting component prone to failures (with and without redundancy)  Interface with voting logic

20 Activities ongoing – Dependability studies Courtesy of S.Wagner Interface with voting logic A. Apollonio  Series of quantitative studies performed on architecture of  Quench Loop  Interface with fault-free voting  Interface with voting component prone to failures (with and without redundancy)  Interface with voting logic

21 Activities ongoing – Dependability studies Courtesy of S.Wagner Availability Safety  2oo3 is the best compromise for availability and safety, but… it is only efficient if does not stop at the level of the CIS, but … Quench Loop

22 Activities ongoing – Dependability studies Courtesy of S.Wagner Interface A_B1_B2_C1_C2_C3_B0CO_ Mission completed B7 7.95E-017.40E-018.50E-016.89E-018.42E-018.54E-017.40E-018.24E-01 Emergency success B5A 1.28E-011.25E-011.32E-011.20E-011.33E-011.32E-011.24E-011.32E-01 False successB5B 7.62E-021.36E-011.68E-021.91E-012.48E-021.28E-027.68E-024.44E-02 Emergency missed B6A 4.62E-047.96E-069.16E-045.69E-061.25E-051.37E-034.09E-042.31E-05 False missedB6B 5.87E-02 Availability Safety … continued to the client system.

23  Several proposals based on PLC S7- 400 series:  Redundant configuration: S7-400H + 2oo3  Redundant + Safety configuration: S7-400FH + 2oo3  Performance analysis on periphery based on:  Response times  MTBF figures from SIEMENS catalogue  Results shown:  F modules ~3 times slower than standard  F modules ~3 to 5 times more likely to fail than standard Activities ongoing – Interlock prototype Courtesy of M. Zaera-Sanz

24  Provides unique interface to the Quench Loop with required dependability  Remote test facility  Simplified test and commissioning  Unique version common to all clients  Based on CIBU design Activities ongoing – Interface box Courtesy of J. Burdalo-Gil

25 Next milestones  First version of PLC program, implementing local and global IPFs  Performance measurements for realistic configuration  Functional verification of prototype  Remote diagnostics for user interfaces  Experimental setup being built in China with current leads QD

26 Next milestones

27 Thanks for your attention

28 Parameters of electrical circuits

29 Fault tree representations


Download ppt "Status of ITER collaboration for Machine Protection I. Romera On behalf of the colleagues who contribute to the project Thanks to: Sigrid, Markus, Rüdiger,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google