Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySamuel Terry Modified over 9 years ago
1
of 38 lecture 13: propositional logic – part II
2
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system PROP_G design to be simple syntax and vocabulary the same as PROP_H it has,, as standard operators, and a much larger set of inference rules for introducing and eliminating the operators ece 720, winter ‘122
3
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system PROP_G a different name – a natural deduction system ece 720, winter ‘123
4
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system a special symbol (or ) that defines a sequent sequent is interpreted as a statement: when all formulae on the left side of the are true then at least one of those on the right is true ece 720, winter ‘124
5
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system if all formulae of a set is true then one of formulae of a set is true ece 720, winter ‘125
6
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system either or can be derived from and ece 720, winter ‘126
7
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system a symbol is used for making statements about what hypotheses a chain of inference is based on, and for couching inference rules so that the steps in a chain of inference can actually be performed ece 720, winter ‘127
8
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system a sequent rule is written as a collection of sequents above a horizontal line, and a single sequent below it (if you have a collection of sequents that matches what is above the line, you can replace them by the single sequent below) ece 720, winter ‘128
9
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system there are two groups of inference rules for introducing logical operators for rearranging sequent ece 720, winter ‘129
10
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system – introduction rules ece 720, winter ‘1210
11
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system – introduction rules ece 720, winter ‘1211
12
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system – introduction rules ece 720, winter ‘1212
13
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system – introduction rules ece 720, winter ‘1213
14
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system – structural rules ece 720, winter ‘1214 reordering
15
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system – structural rules ece 720, winter ‘1215 weakening
16
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system – structural rules ece 720, winter ‘1216 contraction
17
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system proofs are constructed by working from sequents of the form A A, via the rules (just shown), to a sequent consisting of just the desired formula on the right ece 720, winter ‘1217
18
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system – proof of PH1 ece 720, winter ‘1218 A (B A)
19
of 38 Gentzen system – proof of PH2 ece 720, winter ‘1219
20
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system – proof of PH3 ece 720, winter ‘1220 A A
21
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system – … ece 720, winter ‘1221 Modus Ponens
22
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system anything which can be proven in PROP_H can also be proven in PROP_G what leads to a theorem: anything which is valid is provable in PROP_G ece 720, winter ‘1222
23
of 38 propositional logic Gentzen system there are also theorems for soundness, consistency, decidability – both systems are equivalent additional: cut elimination theorem any theorem which can be proved in PROP_G has a proof which does not contain a use of the CUT rule ece 720, winter ‘1223
24
of 38 propositional logic tableau system designed to support proofs by contradiction idea: since every proposition is either true or false, if we show that something cannot be false then it must be true ece 720, winter ‘1224
25
of 38 propositional logic tableau system PROP_B has the same syntax and vocabulary as PROP_G ece 720, winter ‘1225
26
of 38 propositional logic tableau system proofs are constructed in terms of an object called a semantic tableau – this is an attempt to enumerate the ways the world could be, given the hypotheses of the proof, and to show that in all of them the negation of the desired conclusion must be false, so the conclusion itself must be true ece 720, winter ‘1226
27
of 38 propositional logic tableau system a tableau is a tree of formulae, built up according to the following five rules: ece 720, winter ‘1227
28
of 38 propositional logic tableau system (rule i) if A 1, A 2, … A n are the premises of a proof, then A 1 A 2 … A n is a tableau ece 720, winter ‘1228
29
of 38 propositional logic tableau system (rule ii) if some branch contains a formula A i which is of the form B i C i then the tree formed by adding Bi and Ci on the end is a tableaup q r q r ece 720, winter ‘1229
30
of 38 propositional logic tableau system (rule iii) if some branch contains a formula A i which is of the form B i C i then the tree formed by adding B i and C i on the end is a tableaup p q p q ece 720, winter ‘1230
31
of 38 propositional logic tableau system (rule iv) if A i is B i C i then the tree is extended by adding new branches B i and C i so thatr p q p q ece 720, winter ‘1231
32
of 38 propositional logic tableau system (rule v) if A i is B i for some non-atomic B i, then the tree is extended by adding C i D i when B i is C i D i C i when B i is C i ece 720, winter ‘1232
33
of 38 propositional logic tableau system each branch represents a partial description of the world which is consistent with the original set of premises if any branch contains both A and A for some A then it is clearly not feasible description of the world – we say the branch is CLOSED ece 720, winter ‘1233
34
of 38 propositional logic tableau system if all branch is CLOSED – then there is no feasible descriptions of the world which are consistent with the premises on which it is based so, proof – adding negation of the goal to the premises and showing that the tableau based on that collection is CLOSED (every branch is CLOSED) ece 720, winter ‘1234
35
of 38 propositional logic tableau system – proof 1 to show that r follows from p, q, (p [q r]) ece 720, winter ‘1235
36
of 38 propositional logic tableau system – proof 2 (PH2) ece 720, winter ‘1236
37
of 38 propositional logic tableau system – proof 2 (PH2) cont. ece 720, winter ‘1237
38
of 38 propositional logic tableau system – proof 3 ece 720, winter ‘1238
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.