Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Analyzing Differences in Protein Sequences Between Subjects with Varying T Cell Counts J’aime Moehlman Amanda Wavrin Loyola Marymount University March.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Analyzing Differences in Protein Sequences Between Subjects with Varying T Cell Counts J’aime Moehlman Amanda Wavrin Loyola Marymount University March."— Presentation transcript:

1 Analyzing Differences in Protein Sequences Between Subjects with Varying T Cell Counts J’aime Moehlman Amanda Wavrin Loyola Marymount University March 22, 2010

2 Outline Introduction Results Discussion Further Research References

3 Introduction to the HIV-1 Structure The site on gp120 that binds to the CD4 receptor is vulnerable to neutralizing antibodies. However, most antibodies that interact with the site cannot neutralize HIV-1. There are many features that help the gp120 protein escape the immune system of the host such as: – Variable Loops – N- Linked Glycosylation – Confomational Flexibility The functions of the gp120 protein are influenced by the structure within the V3 region.

4 Our Proposed Question: Will there be specific differences between the protein sequences in subject 10 and 12 that results in different protein structures, which changes the function of the virus? Hypothesis: There will be specific amino acids that cause differences in the protein structures between subjects 10 and 12.

5 Subject’s 10 and 12 were selected based on their Annual Rate of CD4 T cell decline

6 The Phylip’s Drawtree shows that Subject 10 and 12 are not closely related.

7 BOXSHADE Sequences for our Representative Visits

8 Predicting the Secondary Structure of Subject 10’s Protein Sequence Using PSIPRED H: Helical E: Extended C: Random Coil Conf:947814567777306999858867895368998735651458871002107441055763 Pred:CEEEECCCCCCCCEEEEEECCCCEEEECCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEECCCEECHHHHH AA: EVVIRSENFTDNAKTIIVQLNKAVEINCTRPNNNTRRRISMGPGRVLYTTGEIIGDIRQA 10 20 30 40 50 60 Conf: 20547877765799999999976189447760589 Pred: HHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCEEEEECCC AA: HCNLSRTKWNDTLKQVVDKLREQFRNKTIIFNQSS 70 80 90

9 Graphical Representation of the Secondary Structure of Subject 10’s Protein Sequence

10 Predicting the Secondary Structure of Subject 12’s Protein Sequence Using PSIPRED H: Helical E: Extended C: Random Coil Conf:94782456777730699985885789636899874565045887100210733105676 Pred:CEEEECCCCCCCCEEEEEECCCCEEEECCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHEECCCEECHHHH AA:EVVIRSKNFTDNAKIIIVQLNETVEINCTRPNNNTRKSIPIGPGRAFYTTGEIIGDIRQA 10 20 30 40 50 60 Conf: 10557878765799999999976189447750689 Pred: HHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCEEEECCCC AA: HCNLSGAKWNETLKQIVIKLKEQFRNKTIVFSPSS 70 80 90

11 Graphical Representation of the Secondary Structure of Subject 12’s Protein Sequence

12 Locating the V3 Loop of the gp120 Protein EVVIRSVNFTDNAKTTIIVQLNTSVEINCTGAGHCNISRAKWNNTLKQIA SKLREQFGNNKTIIFKQSSGGDPEIVTHSFNCGGEFFYCNSTQLFNS By using the Kwong et. al article, we were able to identify the V3 region of the gp120 protein using the two representative clones.

13 The V3 Loop of the gp120 Protein

14 Boxshade of Subjects 10 and 12 to find differences within their sequences

15 Compared Our Secondary Structure’s with the Kwong et al. 3-D Structure In the Kwong Structure: – At location 15 there is a threonine that resulted in an extended sheet. – At location 38 there is an arginine that resulted in a helical structure. – At location 66 there is a glutamine that resulted in an extended sheet. – At location 78 there is a serine that resulted in an extended sheet. – At location 93 there is a leucine that resulted in a random coil.

16 Comparison Continued with Subject 10 In our secondary structures we found: – Subject 10: At amino acid 15, the predicted structure, an extended sheet, was found At amino acid 38, the predicted structure was a random coil, which is not consistent with the actual structure. At amino acid 66, the predicted structure was helical, which is not consistent with the actual structure. At amino acid 78, the predicted structure was helical, which is not consistent with the actual structure. At amino acid 93, the predicted structure, a random coil, was found.

17 Comparison Continued with Subject 12 In our secondary structures we found: – Subject 12: At amino acid 15, the predicted structure, an extended sheet, was found. At amino acid 38, the predicted structure was a random coil, which is not consistent with the actual structure. At amino acid 66, the predicted structure was helical, which is not consistent with the actual structure. At amino acid 78, the predicted structure was helical, which is not consistent with the actual structure. At amino acid 93, the predicted structure, a random coil, was found.

18 Position Subject 10Subject12V3 Loop 15 T: Threonine, polar, hydrophilic I:Isoleucine, nonpolar- hydrophobic T: Threonine, polar, hydrophilic 38 R:Arginine, basic, polar, hydrophilic S:Serine, polar, (uncharged), hydrophilic R:Arginine, basic, polar, hydrophilic 66 R:Arginine, basic, polar, hydrophilic G:Glycine, hydrophobic Q: Glutamine, polar, hydrophilic 78 D: Aspartic acid, acidic, polar, hydrophilic I:Isoleucine, nonpolar- hydrophobic S: Serine, Polar, (uncharged), hydrophilic 93 Q: Glutamine, polar, hydrophilic P:Proline, hydrophobic L: Leucine, hydrophobic

19 Position Subject 10Subject12V3 Loop 15 T:Threonine, polar, hydrophilic I:Isoleucine, nonpolar- hydrophobic T:Threonine, polar, hydrophilic The closest side chain on the blue domain is a glutamine, which is polar. Between the two subjects there is a change between a hydrophobic and hydrophilic amino acid.

20 Position Subject 10Subject12V3 Loop 38 R: Arginine, basic, polar, hydrophilic S: Serine, polar, hydrophilic R: Arginine, basic, polar, hydrophilic Arginine is greater in size than Serine. They are all hydrophilic amino acids.

21 Position Subject 10Subject12V3 Loop 66 R:Arginine, basic, polar, hydrophilic G:Glycine, hydrophobic Q:Glutamine, polar, hydrophilic In subjects 10 and 12; the amino acid changes from hydrophilic to hydrophobic causing a potential structural difference. Glutamine is larger in size than Glycine, but is closer in size to Arginine.

22 Position Subject 10Subject12V3 Loop 78 D: Aspartic acid, acidic, polar, hydrophilic I: Isoleucine, nonpolar, hydrophobic S: Serine, Polar, hydrophilic There is a difference between nonpolar and polar properties. Isoleucine is larger in size than the other two amino acids. Within the two subjects there is a change based off of hydrophobic and hydrophilic properties which has the potential to cause a structural difference.

23 Position Subject 10Subject12V3 Loop 93 Q:Glutamine, polar, hydrophilic P:Proline, hydrophobic L: Leucine, hydrophobic Both Proline and Leucine are hydrophobic and Glutamine is hydrophilic, which can cause a change in the structure. Structurally, Leucine and Glutamine are similar, while Proline has a cyclical structure.

24 There will be specific amino acids that cause differences in the protein structures of subjects 10 and 12 Based off of our results, we accept our hypothesis for the tertiary structures of the proteins. There were specific amino acid changes between the subjects, but they did not result in predicted secondary structural changes. There were differences in the amino acids between our secondary structure and that of the actual V3 structure (from Kwong et al). This resulted in structural differences between them.

25 Opportunities for Further Research Analyze an individual subjects amino acid sequence and protein structure to potentially create a neutralizing antibody for the HIV-1 virus. There are many features that help the gp120 protein escape the immune system of the host such as: – Variable Loops – N- Linked Glycosylation – Confomational Flexibility

26 References Markham RB, Wang WC, Weisstein AE, Wang Z, Munoz A, Faradegan H, and Yu XF. Patterns of HIV-1 evolution in individuals with differing rates of CD4 T cell decline. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998 Oct 13; 95(21) 12568- 73. Kwong PD, Wyatt R, Robinson J, Sweet RW, Sodroski J, and Hedrickson WA. Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody. Nature 1998 Jun 18; 393(6686) 648-59. Chen L, Kwon YD, Zhou T, Wu X, O’Dell S, Cavacini L, Hessell AJ, Pancera M, Tang M, Xu L, Yang ZY, Zhang MY, Arthos J, Burton DR, Dimitrov DS, Nabel GJ, Posner MR, Sodroski J, Wyatt R, Mascola JR, Kwong PD. Structural basis of immune evasion at the site of CD4 attachment on HIV-1 gp120. Science. 2009 Nov 20;326(5956):1123- 7.


Download ppt "Analyzing Differences in Protein Sequences Between Subjects with Varying T Cell Counts J’aime Moehlman Amanda Wavrin Loyola Marymount University March."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google