1. Maintaining FIA’s Credibility as The Nation’s Forest Census Dave Struble Maine Forest Service

2. Critical Attributes Accurate Timely Unbiased Relevant

4. NRS Estimates Inventory Data for 2006 Release Date GS Inventory (MCF) GS Net Growth (MCF) GS Removals (MCF) Growth/ Removals % September 23, 2008 22,539,185 567,409 488,826 116% December 13, 2008 22,539,000 468,600 528,300 89% September 28, 2009 22,558,600 468,604 528,301 89% November 30, 2009 23,163,397 518,760 559,434 93%

5. SOURCERelease Date GS Inventory (MCF) GS Net Growth (MCF) GS Removals (MCF) Growth/ Removal % NRSSeptember 23, 2008 22,539,185 567,409 488,826116% MFSMarch 29, 2009 22,969,600 536,600 469,500114% RPAMarch, 2009 22,403,000 580,062 490,003118%

6. Release Date GS Inventory (MCF) GS Net Growth (MCF) GS Removals (MCF) Growth/ Removal % 2003 22,413,400 512,526 525,77297% 2006 23,163,397 518,760 559,43493% 2007 23,110,605 555,368 570,73597% 2008 23,148,203 573,196 562,230102% 2003 - 2008 Inventory Change/Year 2008 Net Change per Year 146,961 10,966

8. Tree-Level Volume Estimation Previously (for the most part), individual tree volumes were estimated and based on field-measured diameters, merchantable lengths, and cull discounts. It has found that “NOISE” in the measurements of tree lengths and assessment of cull outweighed the true “SIGNAL”; despite the fact that QA/QC checks were consistently meeting the Measurement Quality Objective (MQO) tolerances. A taper model is now used to estimate needed tree lengths (merchantable, sawlog) as a function of DBH and total height (mostly field estimated) Another model estimates the percent of total tree volume represented by cull, as a function of species group, D- Class, dead/alive, and tree class

9. Comparing volume estimates using field collected data versus modeled substitutes

15. Component Ratio Method (CRM) for Biomass In the past, merchantable volume and biomass were estimated using separate sets of equations. Now CRM harmonizes volume, biomass, and carbon estimates and is comprised of a series of steps. We are still trying to fully understand and match up transitions from 1982 to 2008. Suffice to say, the deck chairs keep getting reshuffled, and several 2008 estimates do not make sense.

16. Biomass Estimation Quandaries 2008 growing stock bole biomass estimate (385 MDT) is 1.4% higher than its equivalent 1982 estimate (380 MDT). –Counter – The 2008 growing stock merchantable bole cubic foot estimate is 8% less than its 1982 equivalent. Old version 2003 growing stock bole biomass estimate is 21% more than the new 2003 equivalent. –Counter – The new 2003 growing stock merchantable cubic foot estimate is 4% more than 2003 equivalent. 2008 sapling biomass estimate is only 5.2% more than its 1982 equivalent. –Counter – The 2008 sapling stocking estimate (# of stems) is 97% more than its 1982 equivalent.