Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Jidong Gao, Kristin Kuhlman, Travis Smith, David Stensrud 3DVAR Storm-scale assimilation in real- time.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Jidong Gao, Kristin Kuhlman, Travis Smith, David Stensrud 3DVAR Storm-scale assimilation in real- time."— Presentation transcript:

1 Jidong Gao, Kristin Kuhlman, Travis Smith, David Stensrud 3DVAR Storm-scale assimilation in real- time

2 Convective-scale Warn-on-Forecast Vision Probabilistic tornado guidance: Forecast looks on track, storm circulation (hook echo) is tracking along centerline of highest tornadic probabilities Radar and Initial Forecast at 2100 CSTRadar at 2130 CST: Accurate Forecast Most Likely Tornado Path T=2120 CST T=2150 T=2130 T=2140 70% 50% 30% T=2200 CST Developing thunderstorm Most Likely Tornado Path T=2120 CST T=2150 T=2130 T=2140 T=2200 CST An ensemble of storm-scale NWP models predict the path of a potentially tornadic supercell during the next 1 hour. The ensemble is used to create probabilistic tornado guidance. 70% 50% 30% Stensrud et al. 2009 (October BAMS)

3 Probabilistic convective-scale analysis and forecast system High-resolution 3-d analysis produced every 5 min 1-h ensemble forecasts produced every 5 min –Provides probabilities of hazardous weather Assimilation of all available observations

4 Multiple sensors 4 Radar #1 Radar #2 Radar #3 + Denser Observations!

5 Example: Multi-sensor data fields Show physical relationships between data fields from multiple sensors Storm tracks and trends can be generated at any spatial scale, for any data fields Future state predicted through extrapolation shows skill out to about an hour Near-surface reflectivity Reflectivity @ -20 C (~6.5 km AGL) Total Lightning Density Max Expected Size of Hail 55

6 Courtesy Lou Wicker A better alternative? Radar #1 Radar #2 Radar #3

7 Single analysis that can also be used to initialize forecast models for Warn-on-Forecast 3D Wind (U/V/W) Solve vorticity equation Not limited by edge of echo Pres/Temp/RH

8 Radar Data Assimilation Dowell and Wicker (2009) Tornado Tracks

9 Real-time assimilation / Hazardous Weather Testbed (Spring 2012)

10 Getting started: R & D goals for Spring 2012 To create realtime weather-adaptive 3DVAR analyses at high horizontal resolution and high time frequency with all operationally available radar data from the WSR-88D network. To use the analysis product to help detect supercells and determine if these analyses can improve forecasters awareness of the hazardous weather event.

11 3D-Var: An Introduction Given a set of observations and a model of some physical parameters, what does knowledge of observations tell us about the model state? 3D-Var finds the optimal analysis that minimizes the distance to the observations weighted by the inverse of the error variance J(x) = cost function (to be minimized such that x = x a : ) X a = optimal analysis of field of model variables X b = background fieldY 0 = observations H matrix transforms vectors in model space to observation space B = background error covarianceR = observational error covariance

12 3D-Var: An Introduction The minimum is found by numerical minimization, which is typically an iterative process Fig. from ECMWF (Bouttier & Courtier) Schematic of the cost function minimization in two dimensions. The minimum is found by performing several searches to move the control variable to areas where the cost-function is smaller, usually by looking at the local slope (the gradient) of the cost-function.

13 3D-Var: Advantages The essence of the 3D-Var algorithm is to rewrite a least-squares problem as the minimization of a cost-function. The method was introduced in order to remove the local data selection in the Optimal Interpolation algorithm, thereby performing a global analysis of the 3-D meteorological fields, hence the name. For 3D-Var: Observations and model variables can be non-linearly related There is no data selection – all available data used simultaneously (no jumpiness in boundaries between regions) 4D-Var is generalized as 3D-var for observations that are distributed in time. 4D-Var is more complex: needs linearized perturbation forecast model and its adjoint to solve the cost function minimization problem efficiently

14 Real-time system 1pm to 9pm daily 4 floating domains (user-controlled) 1 km res 31 vertical levels 200x200 grid points 5-min updates Near-real-time (<5 min latency)

15 Real-time system NAM forecast is used for the background field interpolated to the 3DVAR analysis time Uses Reflectivity and Radial Velocity from all nearby WSR-88D radars Cloud analysis 3DVAR Wind analysis

16 User-controlled domain w/ MRMS domains

17 3D Wind field Max updraftSimulated Reflectivity & 3D Wind Vector

18 Vertical Vorticity

19 Vorticity Tracks 3DVAR assimilation vorticity track 0-3 km MSL KTLX azimuthal shear track 0-3 km MSL

20 May 10, 2010 Courtesy NWS-Norman

21 May 10 – Stanley Draper EF4

22 Vorticity Track / Max Updraft Track – Apr 30, 2010

23 Hail Size (MR/MS) versus updraft intensity: May 16, 2010

24 May 10 – Stanley Draper EF4

25 April 14, 2011 – floating domains working together Updraft Track (6-hour) Vorticity Track (6-hour) Floating Domain

26 May 16 Hail Storm / OKC Assimilation simulated reflectivity KTLX Reflectivity

27 Notes 20 prior cases (from 2010, all of which are supercells) showed: max W range: 15 to 25 m/s max Vorticity range: 0.012 to 0.032 s -1 values seem to vary based on range from radar More study is needed, here Trends of vorticity match azimuthal shear Updraft intensity frequently trends w/ MESH

28 A typical session You will use the 3DVAR analysis to help with warning decision assistance. AWIPS / WarnGen; WDSS-II for some displays Feedback: real-time observation / discussion (recorded to EWP blog) web-based surveys daily post-mortem discussion

29 Things to ponder this week Look long-term (5-10-15 years into the future). Think about how the 3DVAR storm structure and morphology compare to how you would analyze the data during typical forecast/warning operations in your office. Consider how storm-scale ensemble prediction will affect warning decision-making and communication of warning information in 10-15 years.

30 In Conclusion You are getting the first look at these real-time data! It’s the start of a > 10-year journey. Web archive / real-time images: http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/users/jgao/public_html/ana lysis/RealtimeAnalysis.htmhttp://www.nssl.noaa.gov/users/jgao/public_html/ana lysis/RealtimeAnalysis.htm http://tiny.cc/3DVAR


Download ppt "Jidong Gao, Kristin Kuhlman, Travis Smith, David Stensrud 3DVAR Storm-scale assimilation in real- time."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google