Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 2:00-3:00 PM ET Understanding Grading in Competency-based Schools.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Thursday, April 24, 2014 2:00-3:00 PM ET Understanding Grading in Competency-based Schools."— Presentation transcript:

1 Thursday, April 24, 2014 2:00-3:00 PM ET Understanding Grading in Competency-based Schools

2 Introducing our Panelists  Abbie Forbus, Counselor, Lindsay Unified High School (CA)  Brett Grimm, Assistant Principal of Curriculum & Instruction, Lindsay Unified High School (CA) Lindsay Unified School District http://lindsay.k12.ca.us/ 2

3 Overview  Welcome to CompetencyWorks  What is Competency Education  Why Redesign Grading for Competency-based Schools?  Elements of Competency-based Grading  Grading at Lindsay Unified School District  Going Forward: Emerging Issues  Getting Involved in CompetencyWorks 3

4 Partners 4

5 Competency Education: Working Definition  Students advance upon mastery.  Competencies include explicit, measurable, transferable learning objectives that empower students.  Assessment is meaningful and a positive learning experience for students.  Students receive timely, differentiated support based on their individual learning needs.  Learning outcomes emphasize competencies that include application and creation of knowledge, along with the development of important skills and dispositions 5

6 Why Redesign Grading?  Subjectivity, Variation and Inaccurate Measures of Achievement  Swiss Cheese Achievement  Motivation, Competition and Control  MOST IMPORTANT – Competency education is about aligning all elements of the system with student learning and advancement. 6

7 Elements of Competency-based Grading  Learning Progressions  Calibrating Proficiency Through Levels of Knowledge  A Culture of Transparency  A School-wide Standards-based Grading Policy What’s the difference between standards-referenced and standards-based grading?  Not Yet Proficient and the Role of Feedback, Revision and Reassessment  Tracking and Communicating Progress 7

8 QUESTIONS? 8

9 Transition from Traditional to PBS Why the Transition?  System failing learners Valedictorians in remedial classes at university 20-30% proficiency on state tests Vision for the Shift – Strategic Design  Community Involvement  Guiding Beliefs/Vision Statements All students can learn Students learn in different timeframes 9

10 Paradigm Shift 10 TraditionalPersonalized Learning (Performance-Based) Quantity of WorkQuality of Evidence Summative averaged scores Formative feedback to improve learning and achieve mastery Failed course = Repeat entire course Continue until mastery – Targeted instruction on areas of need Letter grades based on teacher judgment Proficiency score based on learning (DOK and Rubrics) Inconsistent from teacher to teacher Consistent calibrated scoring

11 11

12 12

13 Science rubric example 13

14 QUESTIONS? 14

15 Transparency  Building learner ownership of learning  Learners know… “What I must learn” “How I can demonstrate learning” “Where I go next”  EDUCATE © (Digital Learning Platform) 15

16 16 Educate Student Snapshot

17 17 Scores and evidence of learning Measurement Topics and Learning Targets (standards) Hyperlink to Overview, Scoring Guides, Resources, Learning Opportunities

18 18

19 QUESTIONS? 19

20 Personalized Learning  Guiding Belief…“Students learn in different ways and different timeframes”  Guaranteed and viable curriculum Courses designed for average learner to complete in a school year  Knowing this… Pace is personalized Ultimately we respond to needs of learner and make sure they get it. 20

21 Lindsay Learner Example 21 This learner started high school below 9 th grade in English By spring of freshmen year, he was still working on English 9, first semester. He completed English 9 in the fall of his sophomore year, indicated by score 3 IP = Course In Progress (core courses) NM = No Mark (elective courses) (A)= First semester (B)= Second semester

22 QUESTIONS? 22

23 Going Forward: Emerging Issues  Recognizing Excellence in Academic Performance  Design for Deeper Learning  Equity in a Competency-based System  Higher Education  Competency-based Human Capital Development  The Role of State Policy in Grading  Badging, Credentialing and Community Assessors 23

24 Resources on Grading in Competency-Based Schools  Progress and Proficiency: Redesigning Grading for Comptency Education www.competencyworks//resources/briefing-papers/  Competency-based Pathways Wiki https://sites.google.com/site/competencybasedpathways/ho me  Great Schools Partnership Proficiency Simplified http://www.greatschoolspartnership.org/proficiency/grading- reporting/ 24

25 FOR MORE INFORMATION AND SHARE IDEAS CHRIS@METISNET.NET 25

26 Get Involved  Become a contributing author  Leadership development  Attention to your organization  Identify novice mastery among your staff  Comment!  Pass on ideas!  Share tools, materials, and know-how  Join CompetencyWorks E-list  Ask everyone in your network (board members, staff, even students) to sign up at the website. 26


Download ppt "Thursday, April 24, 2014 2:00-3:00 PM ET Understanding Grading in Competency-based Schools."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google