Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPoppy Moody Modified over 9 years ago
1
RTC:Rural Research IMPLICATIONS FOR MEETING WIOA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
2
WIOA Performance Accountability Common indicators Percentage of program participants who obtain unsubsidized employment Average costs per participant Indicators of effectiveness in serving employers Levels of accountability State performance Local performance Program performance (e.g. Vocational Rehabilitation)
3
Study 1: Premature Exit from VR In 2012, VR spent approximately $365 million to serve 291,334 consumers who dropped out of services (RSA 2012) $138.8 million – unable to locate or lost contact $124.4 million – consumer refused services $101.6 million – consumer failure to cooperate Figures underestimate true costs Exclude administration costs Exclude staff salaries Exclude any services that are not directly billed on an individual basis
4
Research parameters Prospective study Study participants (n = 355) were newly enrolled in the VR program Collected four waves of data at 6 month intervals Evaluated VR experiences and satisfaction with services Barriers and facilitators to employment i.e. health problems, transportation issues, substance use, personality traits VR services received Rate of VR service delivery – pacing Satisfaction with counselor Exit from VR and reason
5
Theoretical background Relationship Working alliance – shared goals, tasks and bonds between the consumer and counselor Delivery pacing Engagement in the process needs to capitalize on short-term motivation Reinforcement Outcomes are better if reinforcement is provided frequently and early in the process Positive interactions are reinforcing – good counselor/consumer relationship
6
Counselor/consumer relationship Counseling Satisfaction Scale (CSS-12): 12 items to measure 4 counseling dimensions Relationship: respect, listens, understands, responds Meeting: productive, informative, comfortable Professionalism: follow-through, job market Responsiveness: makes time to meet, returns phone calls, returns emails Mean values for individual questions fell between somewhat satisfied and satisfied on all dimensions Overall satisfaction with VR services was significantly correlated to the CSS-12 at all time periods (p ≤.000)
7
Service delivery pacing Almost half felt VR pacing was “too slow” Results were consistent across all time periods (46%, 47%, 43%, and 49%) Only 1-3% felt that pacing was “too fast” at any time period
8
Reason for Exit Compared results based on exit reason(s) Personal reasons: (e.g. concerns about losing benefits, health issues, family issues, substance use issues, transportation barriers, moved) Dissatisfied with services: (e.g not receiving desired services, VR stopped contacting me, problems with counselor, process taking too long) Met goals: (e.g. got a job, received desired services) Reason for Exit Services too slow About the right pace Personal reasons 50% Dissatisfied with services 71%29% Met goals28%72%
9
Rate of contact or reinforcement Examined the number of face to face contacts and phone/email contacts for each six month interval. Time 1Time 2Time 3Time 4 Face to face conversationsµ = 2.8 Mdn = 2 µ = 2.3 Mdn = 1 µ = 1.7 Mdn = 1 µ = 1.5 Mdn = 1 Phone/email conversationµ = 3.1 Mdn = 2 µ = 2.6 Mdn = 2 µ = 1.8 Mdn = 1 µ = 1.8 Mdn = 1
10
Rate of Contact by VR Satisfaction Satisfaction with VRFace to Face Visits Time1 Phone/Email Conversatio ns Time 1 Face to Face Visits Time3 Phone/Email Conversations Time 3 Dissatisfied1.891.73.58.79 Somewhat dissatisfied 2.142.411.951.90 Somewhat satisfied2.623.521.412.24 Satisfied3.493.712.532.12 Significancep ≤.000 p ≤.012p ≤.007
11
Implications More engagement during the VR process and faster service delivery pacing may reduce early exit. Increased contact creates opportunities for developing working alliance Cost neutral communication channels (such as email, phone, or video) may be effective engagement strategies (vs. face to face meetings) Compressing upfront services may help consumers become engaged in the VR process and reduce drop out Even a small increase in consumer engagement could result in significant financial and employment outcomes to meet WIOA performance indicators Using 2012 data, a 5% increase in retention rates could save approximately $16.3 million and result in an additional 6,650 employment outcomes
12
Study 2: Outreach to Rural Business 82 VR informants Representing 48 VR agencies and 37 states Respondents included counselors (26%), supervisors (5%), area managers (45%), and administrators (24%) Study focused on effective rural service delivery methods Subset of questions related to strategies for engaging rural businesses 35 out of 48 agencies indicated business outreach in rural communities
13
Key Findings Attend community events Job fairs, employer events, trade shows Participate in community organizations Chambers of Commerce; Rotary Provide services to employers ADA compliance; tax incentives, job retention, follow-along Develop long-term relationships Continuous engagement (check-ins regarding employer needs, vacancies, etc.) Maintain trust Personal relationships!!! Hire employment specialists Extensive travel to develop community presence Collaborate Shared employees or resources across government work programs Maintain rural offices Provide a location for establishing continuous presence Hire locals Established community connections Reduces turnover
14
Acknowledgements RTC:Rural ◦Catherine Ipsen ◦catherine.ipsen@mso.umt.edcatherine.ipsen@mso.umt.ed ◦406-243-4562 ◦Rebecca Goe ◦Rebecca.goe@mso.umt.eduRebecca.goe@mso.umt.edu ◦406-243-2151 Research Partners ◦CSAVR, Kathy West-Evans Funding Agency ◦NIDRR
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.