1. Budget Discussion Board Briefing 2009-2010 Adopted Budget

2. 2% Scenario Adopted Budget Adopted Budget Reductions Colleges at 2%$1,654,000 Central Support Services at 6%1,848,000 Furloughs: 6 days (SEIU)371,500 Furloughs: 6 days (Local 39)95,500 Furloughs: 6 days (Administrators)185,500 Furloughs: 6 days (Confidential)37,500 PFT500,000 Part-time1,200,000 Workload reduction from State1,400,000 TOTAL7,292,000

3. 2% Cuts 2% Reduction Colleges of Alameda359,000 Laney College638,000 Merritt College401,000 Berkeley City College256,000 TOTAL$1,654,000 (1) Vacant Funded Faculty2,976,000 1351 Allocation13,308,000 Total Part-time Budget16,284,000 1351 Expenses (2008-09)17,467,000 TOTAL-$1,183,000 (1) Includes $457,000 for Research positions.

4. 2009-10 FTES Targets We are projecting being funded up to only 19,100 FTES for 2009-10. Our 2008-09 FTES was 20,300 resident FTES, we were funded for 19,800. That is a reduction of 1,200 FTES over what we served in 2008-09

5. 2009-10 FTES Targets TABLE 1

6. 2008-2009 Fall Comparisons SectionsStudentsClass EnrollmentRes FTES F08F09#(+/-)%(+/-)F08F09#(+/-)%(+/-)F08F09#(+/-)%(+/-)F08F09#(+/-)%(+/-) Alameda438419-19-4%6,2977,6331,33621%12,66216,1203,45827%1,5761,82925316% Laney960970101%13,50114,8351,33410%32,50937,2154,70614%3,4483,99054216% Merritt502434-68-14%7,2377,7965598%15,04216,5991,55710%1,9261,886-40-2% BCC461458-3-1%6,3737,4221,04916%14,04816,6332,58518%1,5821,81223015% District2,3612,281-80-3%27,96530,3372,3728%74,26186,56712,30617% 8,5329,517985 12%

8. FTES College Productivity Targets have been set at: 2009-102008-09 Alameda16.515.0 Laney17.316.5 Merritt16.014.5 Berkeley17.517.4

9. Productivity – How does it add up? FTES GoalFTES/FTEF# of FTEF Needed # of FTEF Available # of PT Faculty Needed Average Cost per PT FTEF 1351 Budget Needed 20,00017.5571.43400171.43$44,000$7,542,875 20,00016.5606400206$44,000$9,064,000 Additional expense in adjunct cost $1,521,143 21,21017.5606400206$44,000$9,064,000 $5,561,160

10. Glossary of Terms FTES: Full-Time Equivalent Student The District receives about $4,600 for each FTES FTEF: Full-Time Equivalent Faculty A load of 100% taught by one instructor (full-time) or several instructors (part-time). Part-time faculty may not exceed 60% of a full-time load (now 67% in January 2009) Productivity The efficiency with which we use our resources. It is figured by dividing the semester WSCH by the semester FTEF. Because FTEF is also an annualized term, productivity can also be figured by dividing the WSCH by 2 times the Load Factor. District target for a productivity of 525 which is the same as 17.5 FTES/FTEF for 07- 08. 17.5x30 = 525. Each decrease of 10 WSCH/FTEF in district wide productivity equates to about $500,000 in additional costs. So if a as a district we decrease from 17.5 FTES/FTEF to 16.5 FTES/FTEF that is the same as 30 point drop or $1,500,000 in additional costs.

11. Examples of Different FTES/FTEF Targets District Wide – 17.5 FTES/FTEF Budgeted 17 FTES/FTEF $750,000 additional costs (more 1351 money needs to be spend) 16.5 FTES/FTEF as a district $1,500,000 in additional costs. 16 FTES/FTEF $2,250,000 additional costs

12. Per Campus as of Fall 2007 If:  Alameda is 18% of district enrollment  Berkeley in 18%  Laney is 43% and  Merritt is 21% Then for each 1 point decrease of FTEF/FTES the additional cost or savings per college is the percentage of $1,500,000  Alameda $270,000  Berkeley $270,000  Laney $645,000  Merritt $315,000 So when Merritt operates at 14.5 vs. 17.5 it cost $1 million more to produce the same FTES at Berkeley

15. Questions?