1. “To CLIL or not to CLIL”“To CLIL or not to CLIL” IES “Fuentesaúco”

2. Inverness Royal Academy” First Meeting: October 2009 “ Inverness Royal Academy” Analysis of the methodologies normally used in each country in the native language. Identifying certain parameters and indicators to evaluate each methodology from the teacher’s point of view.

3. Analysis of the methodologies normally used Methodology depends on: the personality of the teacher. the age of the pupils. the subject. the period of the course.

4. The analysis of teaching methodologies cannot be done just in one session but throughout a complete module.

5. GRID TO ANALYSE TEACHING METHODOLOGIES ObjectivesPresentationHowTime To teach contents. To obtain information. To answer requests. To evaluate -Formal discourse. -Index -Comments. -Reaction of pupils 1. Social discourse. 2. Presentation of the contents. 3. Instructions. 5. Controlled practice 6 Semicontrolled practice 7. Correction

6. Videoclips recorded at our school 1. Art class. students´ age: 12 (1st ESO). Methodology: formal discourse and quick informal feedback. 2. Environmental sciences class. Students´ age: 16 (Diversification Programme). Methodology: multimedia presentation. 3. English class. Students´ age: 12 (1st ESO). Methodology: listening and interactive questions.

8. CONCLUSIONS ??? AGREEMENTS ???

9. IES “Fuentesaúco”