1. Overall results Energy Audit Ukraine Higher Education TA2014015 UA EST Financed by EPTATF Ekodoma, Ltd 3-3 Noliktavas Street LV-1010 Riga Latvia Tel. +371 6 73 23 212 www.ekodoma.lv Dr. Claudio Rochas 12 November 2015

2. Content Project objectives The problem Proposed solutions Overall results Conclusions 2

3. Project first phase: objectives To carry out the energy audits for selected university buildings and facilities:  National Pedagogical Dragomanov University of Kiev - 12 buildings  Lviv Polytechnic National University - 22 buildings and facilities  Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute - 25 buildings and facilities  Total: 59 buildings for 342,000 m² Energy audits according to EU norms and standards  EN 16247 and EN ISO 13790:2008 Energy audits used to define the scope of refurbishment works To increase the technical capacity and awareness on energy efficiency issues To establish a feasible priority investment program 3

4. Identified problems from energy audits Deferred maintenance Critical technical conditions:  Building fabric  Heating systems  Ventilation systems  Electric/lighting systems Low comfort level:  Indoor air temperature  Air quality Low energy performance of buildings Energy tariffs likely to rise

5. 5 PROBLEM

6. Deep renovation Building fabric  Roof and lofts  External insulation of walls  Windows and doors  Basement  Foundation walls Systems  Heating  Domestic hot water  Ventilation  Lighting Investment costs Energy savings O&M costs 6

7. 7 SOLUTIONS

8. Estimated investment costs 8 Total investment costs of about 30.4 m€ For 59 buildings corresponding to 342,000 m²

9. Benchmarking 9 Average investment costs 90 €/m² Additional 25 €/m² for other repairs More than 7 times cheaper than new constructions

10. Energy savings 10 Total heat energy savings: 28,660 MWh/a (24,660Gcal/a) Total savings on electricity: 2,410 MWh/a Total carbon reduction: 12,600 tCO 2 /a

11. Specific energy savings 11

12. Cost Savings 12 Total cost savings equivalent to about 1.5 m€/a

13. Economic indicators 13 Source of data: EUROSTAT Heat tariff currently 20-40% below EU-28 average Electricity tariff currently 47-68% below EU-28 average Average simple payback period ~20 years

14. Simple sensitivity analysis Increase of 40% in heat energy tariffs (to EU levels 55-70€/MWh):  SPBT ~15 years Increase of 100% in electricity tariffs (to EU levels 125 €/MWh)  SPBT ~19 years A 10% grant component:  SPBT ~18 years Combined together:  Good business case 14

15. Conclusions This is a major infrastructure project with long term horizon  30 years and more Highly recommended:  for a save use and operation of the buildings  for suitable indoor climate  For improving learning and teaching conditions  cost 7-8 times less than new constructions Beside energy efficiency measures additional budget has to be planned for structural and basic maintenance repairs Energy savings help the business case  At current condition payback period ~20 years Fitting financial engineering and future increase in energy cost make the business case good:  Acceptable payback time 15

16. Thank you! Ekodoma 3-3 Noliktavas Street, Riga LV1010, Latvia Tel: +371 67323212 email: agris@ekodoma.lv Web side: www.ekodoma.lv

17. Introduction Development of an European Investment Bank lending operation with the Ukrainian Ministry of Education and Science Long-term investment programme:  Modernisation, energy efficiency refurbishment and expansion at selected universities  Addressing 147 buildings and facilities with the total surface of 820,000 m² 17

18. Results 18

19. Benchmarking 19