1. I NTERNATIONAL I NVESTMENT L AW 2 Investor, Investment, Investment Contracts

2. Investor The natural or juridical person That makes the investment Only investments are protected by BITs and ICSID The investor is foreign, if he has the nationality of a foreign state – And therefor is protected by PIL in general – Protected by a BIT or another agreement, if he has the nationality of another state party Substantive rights and jurisdiction

3. Strict regulation. Why? The jurisdiction according to a BIT or to ICSID is strictly and restrictively regulated in treaty law. Why ? Consequence: careful choice of incorporation or seat.

4. Art. 25 ICSID - 1 Article 25 (1) The jurisdiction of the Centre shall extend to any legal dispute arising directly out of an investment, between a Contracting State (or any constituent subdivision or agency of a Contracting State designated to the Centre by that State) and a national of another Contracting State, which the parties to the dispute consent in writing to submit to the Centre.When the parties have given their consent, no party may withdraw its consent unilaterally. (2) “National of another Contracting State“ means: (a) any natural person who had the nationality of a Contracting State other than the State party to the dispute on the date on which the parties consented to submit such dispute to conciliation or arbitration as well as on the date on which the request was registered pursuant to paragraph (3) of Article 28 or paragraph (3) of Article 36, but does not include any person who on either date also had the nationality of the Contracting State party to the dispute; and

5. Art. 25 ICSID - 2 (b) any juridical person which had the nationality of a Contracting State other than the State party to the dispute on the date on which the parties consented to submit such dispute to conciliation or arbitration and any juridical person which had the nationality of the Contracting State party to the dispute on that date and which, because of foreign control, the parties have agreed should be treated as a national of another Contracting State for the purposes of this Convention. (3)Consent by a constituent subdivision or agency of a Contracting State shall require the approval of that State unless that State notifies the Centre that no such approval is required. (4) Any Contracting State may, at the time of ratification, acceptance or approval of this Convention or at any time thereafter, notify the Centre of the class or classes of disputes which it would or would not consider submitting to the jurisdiction of the Centre. The Secretary- General shall forthwith transmit such notification to all Contracting States. Such notification shall not constitute the consent required by paragraph (1).

6. Nationality of the natural Investor According primarily to the rules of the purported home state – No genuine link required (like in diplomatic protection, see the Nottebohm case of the ICJ) – Permanent residence also is not decisive – To be confirmed by the tribunal Double nationality? Art. 25(2)(a) ICSID – Excludes jurisdiction if one is the nationality of the host state

7. Nationality of the legal investor Legal personality necessary Corporations must be incorporated – Nationality: social seat or incorporation As a rule not the control theory (no „piercing of the veil“), if there are no special rules in the Agreement – Possibility of control suffices Also: economically substantial bond to the host state – Not only formal, not necessarily large – Also to be invoked for a „denial of benefits“ if provided for by the treaty Any combination of these factors may be agreed upon If the investor is merely a „shell company“? Still sufficient

8. Nationality of local companies Art. 25 (2) (b) ICSID Companies incorporated in the host state, but controlled by foreigners (e.g. a required local incorporation) – The control has to be ascertained by the tribunal Consent in the contract or offer of consent in the treaty

9. Shareholders as investors Another possibility to bring a claim although the company has local nationality or the nationality of a third state, if the shareholders have the required nationality General PIL: see the Barcelona Traction Case Treaty situation: – Shareholding or other participation in a corporation is considered itself an investment Even minority shareholders If not partially excluded by the treaty Scope of protection – Not only the shares, but also the assets of the corporation Possible conflicts of parallel procedures (e.g. different groups of shareholders)

10. Definition of Investment Prof. Dr. Werner Meng - Europa Institut - Saarland University 10 Investment is long-term – direct or indirect - placement of capital into assets – Classical formula: „property, rights, interests“ Direct investment – Long-term placement (in a foreign country) to purchase real estates and companies including their affiliates or agencies in order to gain a “decisive”, i.e. permanent and immediate influence on the management of these companies. Additionally: regular income and assumption of a risk Indirect investment = portfolio investments – Purchase of instruments in foreign countries solely to gain profitable returns (with higher or lower risks), without aiming at having immediate influence on the issuing company – E.g. purchase of shares Foreign direct investment (active or passive) Domestic investment

11. Investment Term not defined in Art. 25 ICSID – Either by reference to economic teachings (asset oriented) – Or by reference to the extensive treaty practice (now prevailing) Treaty practice – The will of the parties is decisive – Extensive definition (e.g. BIT Argentina-US) – Rights conferred by law and rights conferred by contract – „in accordance with the host state‘s law“ refers to the lawfulness of the investment, not ist definition – No minimum duration required in ICSID – Not: single transactions (trade in goods)

12. Investment criteria Fedax v. Venezuela (1995) – Substantial commitment, certain duration, assumption of risk, significance for the host state‘s development, regularity of profit Salini v. Morocco (2001) – Omits the regularity of profits – Later tribunals adhering to the Salini criteria omitted the significance for the development (e.g. Fakes v. Turkey 2010) Biwater Gauff v. Tanzania (2008) – The will of the parties is decisive

13. Prof. Dr. Werner Meng - Europa Institut - Saarland University13 Authorization (or limitation) of cross-border capital transactions – Import of capital – Export of capital – Investment authorization But decisive is, that the investor has foreign nationality – Problem if the investment is required „in the territory of the host state“ In the EU, 3.3 trillion € were invested in foreign countries, compared to 2.4 trillion € coming from foreign countries in 2008 Foreign Investment

14. The contracts are concluded for the particular investment by the investor and the host state – Based on the investment treaty btw home and host state Often contain rules about – Applicable national law (PCIJ: Serbian Loans) – Stabilization clause Either for the whole national legal order Or for the concrete contract (intangibility clause) – Comprehenively or e.g. for tax law alone – Restrains the sovereignty of the host state – Renegotiation clause In good faith in order to reach a rebalancing of the contract Relatively unclear Investment Contracts Prof. Dr. Werner Meng - Europa Institut - Saarland University14