1. 24-25 September 2009Meeting of the European Directors of Social Statistics Equality statistics: Outcome of the Task Force work and Eurostat proposal for a follow-up Agenda point 4.4

2. 24-25 September 20092 Structure of the presentation Problem Statement  Policy Context  ESS Context  Mandate of the TF TF proposals and Eurostat action plan for the follow-up of the TF work

3. 24-25 September 20093 Problem statement Policy context  (Belinda Pike’s presentation) ESS context  New area ('discrimination') in the Statistical Programme 2008-2013.  New theme 'discrimination’ in the 2008 Annual Statistical Work Programme  Work developed by a Task Force composed of representatives of 11 countries (CZ, DK, FR, HR, IE, IT, NL, AT, UK, NO and CH), of the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights, of DG EMPL and Eurostat

4. 24-25 September 20094 Problem statement Mandate of the TF: Make proposals to fulfil the needs of the Commission's policy on equality: Ethnic origin ReligionDisabilityAgeSexual orientation Gender Employment and vocational training xxxxxx Education x Access to goods and services xx Social protection xx

5. 24-25 September 20095 Task Force proposals and Eurostat follow-up action plan Proposal 1:  TF proposal: Define a limited set of around 15-20 simple indicators which measure outcome differences extracted from the existing data collections  Follow-up action proposed by Eurostat: Set up an internal Eurostat Task Force in the Social Statistics Directorate to prepare a detailed proposal (based on DG EMPL studies ‘The fight against discrimination and the promotion of equality)

6. 24-25 September 20096 Task Force proposals and follow-up action plan Proposal 2:  TF proposal: three classifications to be used –Classification on ethnic origin: Production layer: –Free self-declaration; from a national perspective; combination of origins / main origin –Country of birth and country of birth of parents (added in the core social variables) used as the proxy definition Dissemination layer: aggregated to broad geographical areas –Classification of 'religion/belief': Christian, Muslim, Jew, Sikh, Buddhist, Hindu, Atheist and Other. –Classification of 'sexual orientation or attitude': Heterosexual, Homosexual, Bisexual and Other.

7. 24-25 September 20097 Task Force proposals and follow-up action plan Proposal 2:  Follow-up action proposed by Eurostat: -Coordinated approach with the migration WG for further developing the proposed classification on ethnic origin -Further discuss 'country of birth of parents' in the Social Core Variables WG

8. 24-25 September 20098 Task Force proposals and follow-up action plan Proposal 3:  TF proposal: –Development of a survey on experienced discrimination including: –Incident overview items (number and frequency of discrimination incidents); –And incident detail items; –Implementation to be further discussed (EPSS, LFS).  Follow-up action proposed by Eurostat: –Develop the sampling aspects as a first step for Eurostat (EPSS and methodology teams)

9. 24-25 September 20099 Task Force proposals and follow-up action plan Proposal 4:  TF proposal: –Embedding a question on 'experienced discrimination' in existing data collections –"In the past 12 months have you personally felt discriminated against or harassed on the basis of one or more of the following grounds?”  Follow-up action proposed by Eurostat: –Proposal to be discussed in the corresponding sectoral WG

10. 24-25 September 200910 Conclusion The DSS are asked to:  Take note of the work carried out by the Task Force  Agree with the proposed action plan for the follow-up of the TF work