1. An ecological analysis of crime and antisocial behaviour in English Output Areas, 2011/12 Regression modelling of spatially hierarchical count data

2. Overview 1.Background 2.Data 3.Count data models 4.Extension to multilevel models 5.Extension to spatial models 6.Results and conclusions

3. Purpose of research Ecological factors affecting crime incidence: Demographic Physical Environment Opportunity Cost Social Economic

4. Purpose of research Unit of analysis: Output areas Modern techniques: - Count data models - Hierarchical data models - Spatial models Contextualise raw statistics often quoted Coverage: full population Interrogate ‘newly’ available data Illustrate the use of open data

5. Context Increasing divergence between police recorded crime and the Crime Survey of England and Wales →Crime statistics de-designation – January 2014 →House of Commons PASC report – April 2014 →HMIC report – November 2014 August 2011 riots

6. Crime Data Source: data.police.uk Period: 2011/12 Given And the coefficient of variation is given by An appropriate sample size is therefore determined based on Cochran’s formula

7. Covariate data 2011 Census variables e.g. young adult population, sex ratios, race, divorce rates, household structure, qualifications, method of travel to work, employment, population density ONS Neighbourhood Statistics variables e.g. benefit claimants, small area income estimates DCLG variables indices of deprivation and land use Summary classifications Output Area Classifications and Rural Urban Classifications

8. Count data models – Poisson regression Poisson probability density function (PDF): Model form: Rate parameterisation: Variance = mean = μ Goodness of fit tests:

9. Violation of equidispersion Causes of apparent overdispersion: -Omitted explanatory variables -Outliers -Omitted interaction terms -Omitted variable transformations -Mis-specified link function Tests of equidispersion: -Pearson/Deviance dispersion statistics ≠ 1 -Boundary likelihood ratio test: -Score test: H 0 :α=0; H 1 :α≠0

10. Count data models – Negative binomial model (NB2) Origin from binomial PDF Wide range of formulations e.g. NB-C, NB1, NB2, NB-P, geometric negative binomial etc Traditional formulation is the NB2 model Derivation of NB2 model as a GLM: -Poisson PDF with heterogeneity “gamma” -Derive the NB-C model -Convert to log-linked form Variance: μ + μ 2 /v  μ + αμ 2

11. Hierarchical count data models property crime rates per 1000 fixed assets by police force area total crime rate per usual resident by police force for Output Area populations in the sample

12. Multilevel NB2 model The level 1 variance is

13. Controlling for unobserved spatial dependencies Moran’s I is the linear association between a value and the weighted average of its neighbours

14. Final model Pearson dispersion statistic < 1.148

15. Results Variance: Between police force variability is significant:

16. Results Parameter Estimate Standard Error Exponentiated Parameter Estimate Fixed Part (truncated) fixed intercept-3.3930.3280.034 perc_age16_29_meancentred0.040.0051.041 sex_ratio_perc_meancentred-0.0040.0010.996 divorced_percent_meancentred0.0170.0061.017 perc_leaders_meancentred0.0270.0051.027 spatial lag0.0060.001 Random Part random intercept0.0140.007 ancillary parameter0.6850.024

17. Conclusions and policy implications There are significant differences in crime rates across police force areas Urbanisation has the strongest influence on the relative risk of crime in output areas The relative affluence rather than absolute affluence of an area has an impact on crime Racial composition and immigrant populations have no significant impact on crimes in England

18. Questions? Contact details Chuka Ilochi Abbey 2, Floor 5 BIS 1 Victoria Street London SW1H 0ET Email: chuka.ilochi@bis.gsi.gov.ukchuka.ilochi@bis.gsi.gov.uk Tel: 0207 215 3691