1. Effects of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program on Children with Chronic Health Conditions Amy J. Davidoff, Ph.D. Genevieve Kenney, Ph.D. Lisa Dubay, Sc.M. The Urban Institute Academy Health Meetings June 8, 2004 Funded by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

2. The State Children’s Health Insurance Program Created with passage of BBA in 1997 Voluntary, but all states participating by 2000; states vary in how implemented –16 states only extend Medicaid eligibility –16 states established separate programs –19 states use both mechanisms Separate programs more like private insurance Crowd-out provisions Emphasis on outreach, enrollment simplification

3. SCHIP expansions provide important access to public insurance for children with chronic conditions Children have greater needs for care, greater unmet needs Private insurance alternatives limited, costly Public coverage particularly desirable –Shifts most financial burden from family –Offers broader spectrum of services But SCHIP crowd-out provisions may inhibit enrollment

4. Expected effects of SCHIP expansions for children with chronic conditions: Increased public coverage, reduced uninsured Increased access to care, use of outpatient services –Reduced ER, inpatient use? Reduced family spending on care Outreach & enrollment simplification => spillover effects on Medicaid eligible children

5. Evidence on effects of SCHIP expansions limited Take up among newly income eligible children relatively low –Crowd-out estimates range widely - 15% to 50%, depending on methods, measurement Limited literature on access & use effects for SCHIP –state specific studies on effects for enrolled children –few studies examine effects for children with chronic health conditions –No studies examine effects of SCHIP eligibility on access & use

6. Research Objectives Examine effects of SCHIP expansions nationally for children with chronic health conditions on: –Public & private insurance, uninsured rates –Access, use of services, spending Estimate spillover effects on Medicaid eligible children Compare to healthy children

7. Analytic Approach: Difference in Difference (DD) Pre-post design with comparison group –Examine changes between 1997 and 2000/2001 –Treatment group = newly SCHIP income eligible –Comparison = nearly SCHIP eligible –Examined spillover on Medicaid poverty expansion eligible children Control for differences in characteristics across groups and over time using multivariate regression

8. Analytic Approach (cont.) Estimate OLS regression models Outcome = a 0 + a 1 tx + a 2 postper + a 3 tx*postper + a 4 X + e Coefficient a 3 = effect of being in treatment group during post period X controls for child, family, area characteristics, states

9. Data National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), 1997, 2000 & 2001 Identifying Children with Chronic Health Conditions –Condition checklist: chronic developmental, physical & behavioral conditions –Limited in activity, caused by condition lasting >= 1 year –Reported sad or unhappy most of time, past 6 months –Very low birth weight, < 2 years 18% of children meet criteria

10. Identifying Treatment, Comparison Groups Used detailed algorithm that replicates eligibility determination process Link federal, state rules on disregards, categorical requirements, income thresholds Create relevant measures using household survey data Determine eligibility for Medicaid, SCHIP Compare relevant categorical & income requirements to measures from household survey data

11. Results

16. Spillover effects on Medicaid poverty expansion group similar Increased public coverage, reduced uninsured Similar effects on access, use Larger, significant downward shifts in out-of-pocket spending

17. Magnitude of effects depends on reference point Absolute effects small Relative to target group mean at baseline –30 % reduction in % uninsured –35 % reduction in any unmet need –42 % reduction in unmet dental need Relative to % newly publicly insured –88 % experienced reduction any unmet need –76 % reduced unmet dental need

18. Comparison with healthy children suggests bigger effects on children with chronic conditions Children with chronic conditions experienced: Less loss of private coverage, more newly insured Larger increase in specialist visits Larger decrease in mental health specialist visits Larger decrease in ER visits

19. In summary.. SCHIP expansions successfully increased coverage, but 16 % of eligible remain uninsured Expansions had positive effects on some access measures, but problems remain –17 % with unmet dental need –10 % with unmet Rx need Positive effects were more pronounced for children with chronic health conditions

20. Study Limitations Eligibility, outcome measures based on self report = > measurement error Error in eligibility assignment => contamination of treatment, comparison groups => downward bias Comparison group may differ in unobserved ways NHIS access & use measures limited; may miss important impacts for special services used by children with chronic conditions Don’t capture reduced parent anxiety about accessing needed care for child

21. Policy implications Further progress in reducing uninsured may require targeted outreach –Specialty providers, educators Improvements in access may require restructured provider contracts State caps on SCHIP enrollment => no special protections for children with chronic conditions => risk of losing ground Reduced outreach efforts => reduce positive spillover benefits to Medicaid eligible children