Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEllen Lillian Grant Modified over 9 years ago
1
The Spectrum of Markarian 421 Above 100 GeV with STACEE
Jennifer Carson UCLA / Stanford Linear Accelerator Center February 2006 Space-based Introduce myself. Gamma-ray spectrum covers several decades… List (briefly) different types of experiments… Focus on STACEE 1 MeV 10 MeV 100 MeV 1 GeV 10 GeV 100 GeV 1 TeV 10 TeV Ground-based
2
Outline I. Science goal for -ray detections from active galaxies
• Understanding particle acceleration II. Brief overview of VHE gamma-ray astronomy III. Ground-based detection techniques • Atmospheric Cherenkov technique • Imaging vs. wavefront sampling IV. STACEE V. Markarian 421 • First STACEE spectrum • Detection of high-energy peak? VI. Prospects for the future
3
Radio-loud AGN viewed at small angles to the jet axis
Blazars Radio-loud AGN viewed at small angles to the jet axis • bright core • 3% optical polarization • strong multi-wavelength variability
4
Radio-loud AGN viewed at small angles to the jet axis
Blazars Radio-loud AGN viewed at small angles to the jet axis • bright core • 3% optical polarization • strong multi-wavelength variability • Double-peaked SED: synchrotron emission + ? 10-3 eV (radio) 1 eV (IR) 1 keV (X-ray) 1 MeV 1 GeV ? Maraschi et al. 1994 synchrotron What physical processes produce the high-energy emission?
5
Blazar High-Energy Emission Models
Is the beam particle an e- or a proton? The “standard” picture of an AGN: a central SMBH accretes material from a close-in disk and funnels material into relativistic jets. Two competing models for gamma-ray emission from AGN: Inverse compton (SSC or ECS) Proton-induced cascades The two models make very different predictions for the spectrum of the high-energy emission – much more emission above ~100 GeV in the hadronic models.
6
Blazar High-Energy Emission Models
Is the beam particle an e- or a proton? Leptonic models: • Inverse-Compton scattering off accelerated electrons • Synchrotron self-Compton and/or • External radiation Compton The “standard” picture of an AGN: a central SMBH accretes material from a close-in disk and funnels material into relativistic jets. Two competing models for gamma-ray emission from AGN: Inverse compton (SSC or ECS) Proton-induced cascades The two models make very different predictions for the spectrum of the high-energy emission – much more emission above ~100 GeV in the hadronic models.
7
Blazar High-Energy Emission Models
Is the beam particle an e- or a proton? Leptonic models: • Inverse-Compton scattering off accelerated electrons • Synchrotron self-Compton and/or • External radiation Compton Hadronic models: • Accelerated protons • Gamma rays from pion decay or • Synchroton gamma-ray photons The “standard” picture of an AGN: a central SMBH accretes material from a close-in disk and funnels material into relativistic jets. Two competing models for gamma-ray emission from AGN: Inverse compton (SSC or ECS) Proton-induced cascades The two models make very different predictions for the spectrum of the high-energy emission – much more emission above ~100 GeV in the hadronic models.
8
Blazar High-Energy Emission Models
Is the beam particle an e- or a proton? Leptonic models: • Inverse-Compton scattering off accelerated electrons • Synchrotron self-Compton and/or • External radiation Compton Hadronic models: • Accelerated protons • Gamma rays from pion decay or • Synchroton gamma-ray photons The “standard” picture of an AGN: a central SMBH accretes material from a close-in disk and funnels material into relativistic jets. Two competing models for gamma-ray emission from AGN: Inverse compton (SSC or ECS) Proton-induced cascades The two models make very different predictions for the spectrum of the high-energy emission – much more emission above ~100 GeV in the hadronic models. Gamma-ray observations around 100 GeV can distinguish between models
9
Exploring the Gamma-ray Spectrum
Atm. Cherenkov Wavefront Sampling Atm. Cherenkov Single Dish Imaging Past Compton Gamma Ray Observatory Air shower arrays 100 MeV 1 GeV 10 GeV 1 TeV TeV Energy 1 MeV Atm. Cherenkov Wavefront Sampling Present/Future Atm. Cherenkov Imaging Arrays GLAST
10
Atmospheric Cherenkov Technique
g-ray e+ e- … q ~ 1.5o
11
Single-dish Imaging Telescopes
g-ray q ~ 1.5o Whipple 10-meter
12
Wavefront Sampling Technique
g-ray q ~ 1.5o
13
Wavefront Sampling Technique
g-ray q ~ 1.5o
14
Exploring the Gamma-ray Spectrum
Atm. Cherenkov Wavefront Sampling Atm. Cherenkov Single Dish Imaging Past Compton Gamma Ray Observatory Air shower arrays 100 MeV 1 GeV 10 GeV 1 TeV TeV Energy 1 MeV Atm. Cherenkov Wavefront Sampling Present/Future Atm. Cherenkov Imaging Arrays GLAST Whipple 10-meter
15
Exploring the Gamma-ray Spectrum
Atm. Cherenkov Wavefront Sampling Atm. Cherenkov Single Dish Imaging Air shower arrays STACEE 100 MeV 1 GeV 10 GeV 1 TeV TeV Energy 1 MeV Atm. Cherenkov Wavefront Sampling Atm. Cherenkov Imaging Arrays GLAST Whipple 10-meter CELESTE
16
Exploring the Gamma-ray Spectrum
Atm. Cherenkov Wavefront Sampling Atm. Cherenkov Single Dish Imaging Air shower arrays STACEE 100 MeV 1 GeV 10 GeV 1 TeV TeV Energy 1 MeV Atm. Cherenkov Wavefront Sampling Present/Future Atm. Cherenkov Imaging Arrays GLAST
17
Exploring the Gamma-ray Spectrum
STACEE HESS 100 MeV 1 GeV 10 GeV 1 TeV TeV Energy 1 MeV Atm. Cherenkov Wavefront Sampling Present/Future Atm. Cherenkov Imaging Arrays GLAST VERITAS
18
The High-Energy Gamma Ray Sky
1995 3 sources Mrk421 Mrk501 Crab (2) Pulsar Nebula (1) AGN (0) SNR Other, UNID (0) R.A.Ong Aug 2005
19
The High-Energy Gamma Ray Sky
2004 12 sources Mrk421 H1426 M87 Mrk501 1ES1959 RXJ 1713 Cas A GC TeV 2032 Crab 1ES 2344 PKS 2155 (7) Pulsar Nebula (1) AGN (2) (1,1) SNR Other, UNID R.A.Ong Aug 2005
20
The High-Energy Gamma Ray Sky
2005 31 sources! add. sources in galactic plane. 1ES 1218 Mrk421 H1426 M87 Mrk501 PSR B1259 1ES 1101 1ES1959 SNR G0.9 RXJ 1713 RXJ 0852 Cas A LS 5039 GC Vela X TeV 2032 Crab 1ES 2344 HessJ1303 Cygnus Diffuse PKS 2155 MSH 15-52 H2356 PKS 2005 Pulsar Nebula (4+2) (11) AGN (3+4) (3,3+1) SNR Other, UNID R.A.Ong Aug 2005
21
Wavefront Sampling Detectors
STACEE & CELESTE e+ e- … Properties of gamma-ray showers: Light distribution is fairly uniform Energy is evenly divided between bremsstrahlung photons and kinetic energy of e-s Cherenkov light intensity on ground energy of gamma ray Cherenkov pulse arrival times at heliostats direction of source
22
STACEE Solar Tower Atmospheric Cherenkov Effect Experiment 5 secondary
64 heliostats 5 secondary mirrors & 64 PMTs National Solar Thermal Test Facility Albuquerque, NM Unique method: only one instrument like this has published results (CELESTE) CELESTE was more sensitive than we are, but had terrible weather Cosmic rays are a significant background, at least 1000 times as bright as the Crab
23
STACEE Solar Tower Atmospheric Cherenkov Effect Experiment 5 secondary
64 heliostats 5 secondary mirrors & 64 PMTs National Solar Thermal Test Facility Albuquerque, NM • PMT 4 PEs: ~10 MHz • Two-level trigger system (24 ns window): - cluster: ~10 kHz - array: ~7 Hz • 1-GHz FADCs digitize each Cherenkov pulse Unique method: only one instrument like this has published results (CELESTE) CELESTE was more sensitive than we are, but had terrible weather Cosmic rays are a significant background, at least 1000 times as bright as the Crab
24
STACEE Advantages / Disadvantages
• 2-level trigger system good hardware rejection of hadrons • GHz FADCs pulse shape information • Large mirror area (6437m2) low energy threshold Ethresh = 165 GeV Hardware CR rejection: HESS is running at 300 Hz, Whipple would be running at that if they tried to push to our energies, we run at 7 Hz because of hardware CR rejection Energy threshold is currently limited by width of coincidence window and threshold -> NSB contamination Compare sensititivity to 5 sigma in an hour with Whipple, 5 sigma in 30 seconds (!) with HESS
25
STACEE Advantages / Disadvantages
• 2-level trigger system good hardware rejection of hadrons • GHz FADCs pulse shape information • Large mirror area (6437m2) low energy threshold Ethresh = 165 GeV But… • Limited off-line cosmic ray rejection limited sensitivity: 1.4/hour on the Crab Nebula • Compare to Whipple sensitivity: 3/hour above 300 GeV Hardware CR rejection: HESS is running at 300 Hz, Whipple would be running at that if they tried to push to our energies, we run at 7 Hz because of hardware CR rejection Energy threshold is currently limited by width of coincidence window and threshold -> NSB contamination Compare sensititivity to 5 sigma in an hour with Whipple, 5 sigma in 30 seconds (!) with HESS
26
STACEE Data Observing Strategy: Equal-time background observations for
every source observation (1-hour “pairs”) Analysis: Cuts for data quality Correction for unequal NSB levels Cosmic ray background rejection Significance/flux determination
27
Energy Reconstruction Idea
Utilize two properties of gamma-ray showers: Linear correlation: Cherenkov intensity and gamma-ray energy Uniform intensity over shower area 200 GeV gamma ray 500 GeV proton
28
Energy Reconstruction Method
New method to find energies of gamma rays from STACEE data: 1. Reconstruct Cherenkov light distribution on the ground from PMT charges 2. Reconstruct energy from spatial distribution of light Results: fractional errors < 10% energy resolution ~25-35%
29
Markarian 421 • Nearby: z = 0.03 • First TeV extragalactic source detected (Punch et al. 1992) • Well-studied at all wavelengths except GeV • Inverse-Compton scattering is favored • High-energy peak expected around 100 GeV • Only one previous spectral measurement at ~100 GeV (Piron et al. 2003) Blazejowski et al. 2005 STACEE Krawczynski et al. 2001 STACEE ? log (E2 dN/dE / erg cm-2 s-1) log (Energy/eV)
30
STACEE Detection of Mkn 421
• Observed by STACEE January – May 2004 • 9.1 hours on-source + equal time in background observations • Non – Noff = 2843 gamma-ray events • 5.8 detection • 5.52 0.95 gamma rays per minute • Energy threshold ~198 GeV for = 1.8 Pairwise distribution of Eth = 198 GeV = 1.8
31
Spectral Analysis of Mkn 421
• Six energy bins between 130 GeV and 2 TeV • Find gamma-ray excess in each bin • Convert to differential flux with effective area curve Gamma-ray rate (photons s-1 GeV-1) Effective area (m2) Rate (photons s-1 GeV-1) Aeff(E) (m2) Energy (GeV) Energy (GeV)
32
Spectral Analysis of Mkn 421
First STACEE spectrum = 1.8 0.3stat
33
Spectral Analysis of Mkn 421
First STACEE spectrum = 1.8 0.3stat Flat SED
34
2004 Multiwavelength Campaign
January February March April TeV X-ray PCA data courtesy of W. Cui, Blazejowski et al. 2005
35
2004 Multiwavelength Campaign
January February March April TeV X-ray STACEE observations PCA data courtesy of W. Cui, Blazejowski et al. 2005 • STACEE coverage: 40% of MW nights • ~90% of STACEE data taken during MW nights • STACEE combines low and high flux states
36
Multiwavelength Results
Blazejowski et al. 2005
37
Multiwavelength Results
STACEE region Blazejowski et al. 2005
38
STACEE + Whipple Results
39
STACEE + Whipple Results
40
Science Interpretation
• STACEE’s first energy bin is ~90 GeV below Whipple’s. • STACEE result: is consistent with a flat or rising SED. suggests that the high-energy peak is above ~200 GeV. slghtly is inconsistent with most past IC modeling. • Combined STACEE/Whipple data suggest that the peak is around GeV. • SED peak reflects peak of electron energy distribution.
41
Prospects for the Future
• STACEE will operate for another year Air Cherenkov Single Dish Imaging 100 MeV 1 GeV 10 GeV 1 TeV TeV Energy 1 MeV Compton Gamma Ray Observatory Wavefront Sampling Gamma-ray spectrum
42
Prospects for the Future
• STACEE will operate for another year • Imaging arrays coming online, Ethreshold 150 GeV - HESS: 5 Crab detection in 30 seconds! - VERITAS: 2 (of 4) dishes completed Gamma-ray spectrum Air Cherenkov Wavefront Sampling Air Cherenkov Imaging Arrays Compton Gamma Ray Observatory 1 MeV 10 MeV 100 MeV 1 GeV 10 GeV 100 GeV 1 TeV 10 TeV Energy
43
VHE Experimental World
MILAGRO TIBET STACEE MAGIC TIBET ARGO-YBJ MILAGRO STACEE TACTIC PACT VERITAS GRAPES TACTIC HESS CANGAROO
44
Prospects for the Future
• STACEE will operate for another year • Imaging arrays coming online, Ethreshold 150 GeV - HESS: 5 Crab detection in 30 seconds! - VERITAS: 2 (of 4) dishes completed • GLAST launch in 2007! Gamma-ray spectrum Air Cherenkov Wavefront Sampling Air Cherenkov Imaging Arrays Compton Gamma Ray Observatory GLAST 1 MeV 10 MeV 100 MeV 1 GeV 10 GeV 100 GeV 1 TeV 10 TeV Energy
45
GLAST Large Area Telescope (LAT)
Burst Monitor (GBM) • Two instruments: LAT: 20 MeV – >300 GeV GBM: 10 keV – 25 MeV • LAT energy resolution ~ 10% • LAT source localization < 0.5’
46
EGRET Sources
47
GLAST Potential
48
Conclusions • Gamma-ray observations of AGN are key to understanding
particle acceleration in the inner jets • Many new VHE gamma-ray detectors & detections • STACEE - “1st-generation” instrument sensitive to ~100 GeV gamma rays - Energy reconstruction is successful - 5.8 detection of Markarian 421 - Preliminary spectrum between 130 GeV and 2 TeV - Second spectrum of Mkn 421 at GeV - High-energy peak is above ~200 GeV • Bright future for gamma-ray astronomy
49
Cosmic Ray Background Rejection
What we have: • Hardware hadron rejection (~103) • Off-source observations for subtraction • 2 from shower core reconstruction (‘templates’) • Timing information & 2 from wavefront fit • RMS on average # photons at a heliostat • Limited directional information - reconstruction precision ~0.2°, FOV ~0.6° Some initial success with the Crab nebula… • 5.4 hours on-source after data quality cuts • 3.0 before hadron rejection • Cut on core fit 2 + wavefront fit 2 + direction: 5.7!
50
Field Brightness Correction
Extra light in FOV from stars will increase trigger rate due to promotions of sub-threshold cosmic rays
51
Field Brightness Correction
Extra light in FOV from stars will increase trigger rate due to promotions of sub-threshold cosmic rays After correction Correct using information from FADCs to equalize light levels
52
STACEE Atmospheric Monitor
• Goal: measure atmospheric transmission and detect clouds. • Meade 8'' S-C scope, Losmandy equatorial mount with PC-controlled “goto” pointing/tracking, SBIG CCD camera for pointing and photometry. • Two IR radiometers (cloud detectors). • Full Weather station.
53
Methods for Finding the Shower Core
1. Finding the centroid • If we sampled the entire shower, we could find its centroid. • The early part of the shower is contained within the array. • Use the first few nanoseconds of the shower to find the centroid. x-position of core y-position of core 2. ‘Template’ method • # PEs vs. shower core position • One template per PMT and energy • Fit core and energy with maximum likelihood estimator • Pros: - precise - 2 for hadron rejection • Con: ‘black box’ Sample template
54
Calibrating the Detector
STACEE Atmospheric Monitor Air shower simulations & Atmospheric monitoring Properties of gamma-ray showers: Light distribution is fairly uniform Energy is evenly divided between bremsstrahlung photons and kinetic energy of e-s
55
Calibrating the Detector
STACEE Atmospheric Monitor Heliostat Secondary PMT DTIRC Trasmission measurements Properties of gamma-ray showers: Light distribution is fairly uniform Energy is evenly divided between bremsstrahlung photons and kinetic energy of e-s
56
Calibrating the Detector
PMT Gain Calibration Properties of gamma-ray showers: Light distribution is fairly uniform Energy is evenly divided between bremsstrahlung photons and kinetic energy of e-s electronics
57
STACEE AGN Targets Which objects are most scientifically promising?
R.A.Ong May 2005 Pulsar Nebula SNR AGN Other, UNID The Very High Energy Sky 3C 66A • z = 0.444 • Strong source at energies < 10 GeV • One questionable measurement at TeV energies • High redshift heavy absorption • STACEE flux limit (Bramel et al. 2005) 3C 66A
58
STACEE AGN Targets Which objects are most scientifically promising?
Mkn 421 • z = 0.031 • Well-studied at TeV energies • Target of multi- variability studies • One previous measurement at GeV • High-energy peak is at ~100 GeV • Potential to constrain the optical EBL • STACEE detection (Carson 2005) R.A.Ong May 2005 Pulsar Nebula SNR AGN Other, UNID The Very High Energy Sky Mkn 421
59
STACEE AGN Targets Which objects are most scientifically promising?
W Comae • z = 0.102 • Hard EGRET spectrum: = 1.73 • Limits only at TeV energies • STACEE observations can test model predictions • STACEE flux limit (Scalzo et al. 2004) R.A.Ong May 2005 Pulsar Nebula SNR AGN Other, UNID The Very High Energy Sky W Comae
60
Models of W Comae Predicted differences around 100 GeV Leptonic models
This source is interesting because it has a hard EGRET spectrum, but it hasn’t been detected at TeV energies. Also, there was detailed modeling of the source done, considering both leptonic and hadronic origins for the gamma-ray emission. Leptonic models no emission predicted above 100 GeV Hadronic models significant emission above 100 GeV
61
STACEE Measurement of W Comae
STACEE flux limit constrains hadronic emission models < ~ 2.5 cm-2 s-1 for hadronic models above 165 GeV Scalzo et al. 2004 More data taken last spring may lower these limits.
62
STACEE Measurement of W Comae
STACEE flux limit constrains hadronic emission models < ~ 2.5 cm-2 s-1 for hadronic models above 165 GeV Scalzo et al. 2004 More data taken last spring may lower these limits.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.