Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Multiconsult.no The 4th Forum Wood Building Nordic in Växjö, September 24­-25 – 2015 Fire resistance – are we done now? Recent development in Norway Nils.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Multiconsult.no The 4th Forum Wood Building Nordic in Växjö, September 24­-25 – 2015 Fire resistance – are we done now? Recent development in Norway Nils."— Presentation transcript:

1 multiconsult.no The 4th Forum Wood Building Nordic in Växjö, September 24­-25 – 2015 Fire resistance – are we done now? Recent development in Norway Nils E. Forsén

2 multiconsult.no 2 Themes System of requirements ­ Regulations ­ Guidance ­ Standards Uncontrolled fire – levels/consequences - risks ­ Any reason at all to distinguish between combustible and non- combustible materials? ­ System of safety: Sprinklers/Reaction to fire/Fire brigade – access/Fire resistance Impact of –universal design requirements View back to the nineties …

3 multiconsult.no 3 Think tanks History, empericalRd>Ed, reliabilitySystem of requirements New interpretationsNew experiencesMain structural systems Modeled fireDesign procedure Fire engineering – structural engineering The road ahead

4 multiconsult.no 4 Urban Development – Timber! How tall? How dense? How large? Which use?

5 multiconsult.no 5 System of safety for protection of lives and values Sprinklers? Fire compartments with limited sizes (redundancy)? Access for fire brigade Structural fire resistance - and other fire safety requirements

6 multiconsult.no Functional requirement: Basic function for all buildings Structural resistance in fire sufficient for safe evacuation and rescue: Fire class 1 and 2

7 multiconsult.no Special structural considerations on survival Fire class 3 and 4 Tall buildings 10

8 multiconsult.no Universal design: Elevator required, when 3 storeys or more (dwellings) Sprinkler 8 Elevator Fire class 1 Fire class 2 Fire class 2 Fire class 3, GD: Non- combustible

9 multiconsult.no Essential height limits - dwellings – RKL 4 9

10 multiconsult.no 10 R d,fi > E d,fi

11 multiconsult.no Structural response – in principle Capacity Time Actions in fire, E d,fi Collapse – or… Fire resistance in minutes Capacity development during fire (E d )R d (E d,fi )R d,fi

12 multiconsult.no System of requirements

13 multiconsult.no System of requirements

14 multiconsult.no 14 The distinction between function, performance and verification should be noted: Function: The overall function of the main structural system, i.e. avoid collapse Performance: Measured or calculated fire resistance and material performance according to standard Verification: Use of methods according to standards to verify the performance, or function

15 multiconsult.no 15 Norwegian regulation TEK 10 § 11.3 (4) For the two higher building classes (3 and 4) the requirement is that the that the main structural system of the building shall be designed to maintain a sufficient structural resistance throughout a complete fire development, appropriately modeled..

16 multiconsult.no 16 Pre-accepted levels of performance E.g. R90, non-combustible Experienced and intended safety level: Resistance against collapse of tall buildings due to fire alone

17 multiconsult.no 17 Interpretations in the new age of timber

18 multiconsult.no 18

19 multiconsult.no 19

20 multiconsult.no 20 Challenge Model a complete fire development, including the cooling phase Verify survival of the timber structure Tool: Eurocode 1 part 1-2 parametric fire ­ + probabilistic down-scaling? Effect of sprinklers? Tool thermal analysis FEM – e.g. ANSYS

21 multiconsult.no Modeled fire

22 multiconsult.no 22 Source: SP

23 multiconsult.no In comparison: Timber frame/parametric fire (Nordic Wood 1995) From ”Wood construction behaviour in natural/parametric fires J.König, J. Norén, N.Forsén 1995

24 multiconsult.no 24 Conclusion 3 layers required – an uneconomical and impractical design to withstand a total fire

25 multiconsult.no More robust: CLT -?

26 multiconsult.no 26 Structural engineering vs fire engineering

27 multiconsult.no 27 Important tasks to clarify between disciplines: Structural engineer: Define main structural system Structural fire design– Tools: Eurocodes 1, 5 Fire engineer: Define combustible structure as a deviation from Guidance Document and give input to a parametric fire model Assess the fire safety strategy in regard to a possible probabilistic down-scaling of the fire energy, refer Eurocode 1 (not pre- accepted in Norway)

28 multiconsult.no 28 Possible development in pre-acceptance for tall timber buildings in a future Norwegian GD? For apartment buildings up to 8 storeys (23m to highest floor)provided: Fire compartments moderate in size Sprinklers with high reliability Standard fire resistance R90.

29 multiconsult.no 29 Conclusions A significant market potential for 3-4 storey timber buildings has been there for the past 15 years, the fire regulations represent no obstacle For apartment buildings of 5-8 storeys, an opening in the GD for increased use of timber is possible, given that automatic extinguishing systems are required and that limitations in fire compartment sizes will be defined Beyond this, more spectacular concepts can always be put into life, provided that a comprehensive risk analysis is performed and controlled/approved

30 multiconsult.no Thank you for your attention!


Download ppt "Multiconsult.no The 4th Forum Wood Building Nordic in Växjö, September 24­-25 – 2015 Fire resistance – are we done now? Recent development in Norway Nils."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google