Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 1 / 24 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Collisions Nu Xu Lawrence Berkeley National.

Published byColleen Campbell Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 1 / 24 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Collisions Nu Xu Lawrence Berkeley National."— Presentation transcript:

1 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 1 / 24 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Collisions Nu Xu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Many Thanks to Organizers! X. Dong, H. Huang, M. Oldenburg, H.G. Ritter, K. Schweda, P. Sorensen, A. Tai, Z. Xu

2 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 2 / 24Outline  Motivation  Bulk properties - ∂P QCD - Hadron spectra and elliptic flow - NCQ scaling: deconfinement - Heavy flavor collectivity: thermalization  Summary & Outlook

3 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 3 / 24 Equation of State Equation of state: - EOS I : relativistic ideal gas: p =  /3 - EOS H: resonance gas: p ~  /6 - EOS Q: Maxwell construction: T crit = 165 MeV, B 1/4 = 0.23 GeV  lat =1.15 GeV/fm 3 P. Kolb et al., Phys. Rev. C62, 054909 (2000). With given degrees of freedom, the EOS - the system response to the changes of the thermal condition - is fixed by its p and T (  ). Energy density  GeV/fm 3

4 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 4 / 24 Pressure, Flow, …  d  = dU + pdV  – entropy; p – pressure; U – energy; V – volume  = k B T, thermal energy per dof In high-energy nuclear collisions, interaction among constituents and density distribution will lead to: pressure gradient  collective flow  number of degrees of freedom (dof)  Equation of State (EOS)  No thermalization is needed – pressure gradient only depends on the density gradient and interactions.  Space-time-momentum correlations!

5 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 5 / 24 Collectivity, Local thermalization Hydrodynamic Flow Collectivity Local Thermalization = 

6 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 6 / 24 High-energy Nuclear Collisions Initial Condition - initial scatterings - baryon transfer - E T production - parton dof System Evolves - parton interaction - parton/hadron expansion Bulk Freeze-out - hadron dof - interactions stop jets J/  D      K, K*  p  d, HBT elliptic flow v 2 radial flow  T Q2Q2 time partonic scatterings? early thermalization? T C T ch T fo

7 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 7 / 24 High-energy Nuclear Collisions Initial Condition - initial scatterings - baryon transfer - E T production - parton dof System Evolves - parton interaction - parton/hadron expansion Bulk Freeze-out - hadron dof - interactions stop jets J/  D      K, K*  p  d, HBT elliptic flow v 2 radial flow  T Q2Q2 time partonic scatterings? early thermalization? T C T ch T fo

8 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 8 / 24 Transverse Flow Observables As a function of particle mass: Directed flow (v 1 ) – early see Markus Oldenburg’s talk Elliptic flow (v 2 ) – early Radial flow – integrated over whole evolution Note on collectivity: 1)Effect of collectivity is accumulative – final effect is the sum of all processes. 2) Thermalization is not needed to develop collectivity - pressure gradient depends on density gradient and interactions.

9 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 9 / 24 mid-rapidity, p+p and Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Hadron Spectra from RHIC mid-rapidity, p+p and Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV centrality 5% 10-20% 20-40% 40-60% 60-80% Results from BRAHMS, PHENIX, and STAR experiments (sss)(ssd) (usd) (ss)

10 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 10 / 24 Thermal model fit Source is assumed to be: –Local thermal equilibrated –Boosted radially random boosted E.Schnedermann, J.Sollfrank, and U.Heinz, Phys. Rev. C48, 2462(1993)

11 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 11 / 24 Thermal fits: T fo vs. 1) , K, and p change smoothly from peripheral smoothly from peripheral to central collisions. to central collisions. 2) At the most central collisions, reaches collisions, reaches 0.6c. 0.6c. 3) Multi-strange particles ,  are found at higher T fo  are found at higher T fo (T~T ch ) and lower (T~T ch ) and lower  Sensitive to early partonic stage!  Sensitive to early partonic stage!  How about v 2 ?  How about v 2 ? Data: STAR: NPA715, 458c(03); PRL 92, 112301(04); 92, 182301(04). NA49: nucl-ex/0409004 Chemical fits: Braun-Munzinger, Redlich, Stachel, nucl-th/0304013 200GeV Au + Au collisions Chemical Freeze-out: inelastic interactions stop Kinetic Freeze-out: elastic interactions stop

12 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 12 / 24 Resonance decay tests (1) Resonance decay of  do not affect the freeze-out properties - there are life after the chemical freeze-out! (2) ‘Jets’ lead to finite in p+p collisions Zhixu Liu et al., December 2004.

13 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 13 / 24 Compare with Model Results Model results fit to , K, p spectra well, but over predicted for multi-strange hadrons - Do they freeze-out earlier? Phys. Rev. C69 034909 (04); Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 112301(04); 92, 182301(04); P. Kolb et al., Phys. Rev. C67 044903(03)

14 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 14 / 24 y x pypy pxpx coordinate-space-anisotropy  momentum-space-anisotropy Anisotropy Parameter v 2 Initial/final conditions, EoS, degrees of freedom

15 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 15 / 24 v 2 at low p T region - Minimum bias data! At low p T, model result fits mass hierarchy well! - Details does not work, need more flow in the model! P. Huovinen, private communications, 2004

16 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 16 / 24 v 2 at all p T - v 2, spectra of light hadrons and multi-strange hadrons - scaling of the number of constituent quarks At RHIC:  Partonic collectivity has been attained  Deconfinement has has been attained PHENIX: PRL91, 182301(03) STAR: PRL92, 052302(04) S. Voloshin, NPA715, 379(03) Models: Greco et al, PRC68, 034904(03) X. Dong, et al., Phys. Lett. B597, 328(04). ….

17 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 17 / 24 Partonic Collectivity at RHIC 1) Copiously produced hadrons freeze-out: T fo = 100 MeV,  T = 0.6 (c) >  T (SPS) 2)* Multi-strange hadrons freeze-out: T fo = 160-170 MeV (~ T ch ),  T = 0.4 (c) 3)** Multi-strange v 2 : Multi-strange hadrons  and  flow! 4)*** Constituent Quark scaling: Seems to work for v 2 and R AA (R CP ) Deconfinement Partonic (u,d,s) Collectivity

18 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 18 / 24 Time Scale 1)Coalescence processes occur during phase transition and hadronization; 2)The u-,d-quarks and ‘bound-states’ gain mass accompanied by expansion; 3)Early thermalization with partons and its duration need to be checked. deconfinement Phase and Chiral transitions u-, d-quarks and ‘bound- states’ gain mass

19 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 19 / 24 Open charm production at RHIC - First reconstructed open charm spectrum at RHIC Model: a) pQCD distributions are steeper b) Fragmentation with delta function has harder spectrum c) Total cross sections are lower, a factor of 3-5 - STAR data: A. Tai et al., J. Phys G30: S809(2004); nucl-ex/0404029 - model results: R. Vogt, 2004

20 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 20 / 24 Charm production 1) STAR and PHENIX results are different: 2) NLO pQCD calculations under-predict the ccbar production cross section at RHIC 3) Power law for ccbar cross section from SPS to RHIC: n ~ 2 (n~0.5 for charged hadrons) 4) Large uncertainties in total cross section due to rapidity width, model dependent(?). STAR data: PRL accepted, nucl-ex/0407006

21 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 21 / 24 Non-photonic electron v 2 STAR: 0-80% (F.Laue SQM04) PHENIX: Minimum bias statistical error only corrected for e ± from  decay M. Kaneta et al, J.Phys. G30, S1217(04) Greco, Ko, Rapp, Phys. Lett. B595, 202(04)

22 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 22 / 24 Open charm v 2 - a comparison 1)Constituent Quark Scaling for open charm hadron production? 2)Flow of charm-quark and the thermalization among light flavors? 3)…???? HSD: E. Bratkovskaya et al., hep-ph/0409071 X. Dong, S. Esumi, et al., Phys. Lett. B597, 328(2004).

23 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 23 / 24 Summary & Outlook (1) Collectivity - pressure gradient ∂P QCD  Deconfinement and partonic collectivity at RHIC (2) Partonic (u,d,s) thermalization - heavy flavor v 2 and spectra - di-lepton and thermal photon spectra - J/  production (3)  -vertex upgrades Phenix and STAR - open charm - resonances with both hadronic & leptonic decays

24 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 24 / 24 STAR  -vertex detector H. Wieman et al., STAR Collaboration

25 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 25 / 24 Bulk Freeze-out Systematics The additional increase in  T is likely due to partonic pressure at RHIC. 1) v 2 self-quenching, hydrodynamic model seem to work at low p T 2) Multi-strange hadron freeze-out earlier, T fo ~ T ch 3) Multi-strang hadron show strong v 2

26 HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 26 / 24 Nuclear Modification Factor 1) Baryon vs. meson effect! 2) Hadronization via coalescence 3) Parton thermalization (model) - (K 0,  ): PRL92, 052303(04); NPA715, 466c(03); - Greco et al, PRC68,034904(03);PRL90, 202102(03) - R. Fries et al, PRC68, 044902(03); ), Hwa, nucl-th/0406072

Download ppt "HIRSCHEGG, January 16 - 22, 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 1 / 24 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Collisions Nu Xu Lawrence Berkeley National."

Similar presentations

Multi-strange Hadron v2 and Partonic Collectivity

Multi-strange Hadron v2 and Partonic Collectivity
Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.

Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook 1 Arkadij Taranenko Quark Matter 2006 November 13-20, Shanghai, China Nuclear Chemistry Group SUNY Stony Brook, USA PHENIX Studies.

R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook 1 Arkadij Taranenko Quark Matter 2006 November 13-20, Shanghai, China Nuclear Chemistry Group SUNY Stony Brook, USA PHENIX Studies.
Elliptic flow of thermal photons in Au+Au collisions at 200GeV QNP2009 Beijing, Sep 21 - 26, 2009 F.M. Liu Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano.

Elliptic flow of thermal photons in Au+Au collisions at 200GeV QNP2009 Beijing, Sep , 2009 F.M. Liu Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano.
TJH: ISMD 2005, 8/9-15 Kromeriz, Czech Republic TJH: 1 Experimental Results at RHIC T. Hallman Brookhaven National Laboratory ISMD Kromeriz, Czech Republic.

TJH: ISMD 2005, 8/9-15 Kromeriz, Czech Republic TJH: 1 Experimental Results at RHIC T. Hallman Brookhaven National Laboratory ISMD Kromeriz, Czech Republic.
Anisotropic Flow at RHIC Jiayun Chen (for Collaboration) Institute of Particle Physics, HZNU, Wuhan, 430079, P.R.China Brookhaven National Lab, Upton,

Anisotropic Flow at RHIC Jiayun Chen (for Collaboration) Institute of Particle Physics, HZNU, Wuhan, , P.R.China Brookhaven National Lab, Upton,
First Alice Physics Week, Erice, Dec 4  9, 2005 1 Heavy  Flavor (c,b) Collectivity at RHIC and LHC Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg A. Dainese,

First Alice Physics Week, Erice, Dec 4  9, Heavy  Flavor (c,b) Collectivity at RHIC and LHC Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg A. Dainese,
ISMD’05, Kromeriz, Aug 09  15, 2005 1 Heavy  Flavor (c,b) Collectivity – Light  Flavor (u,d,s) Thermalization at RHIC Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg.

ISMD’05, Kromeriz, Aug 09  15, Heavy  Flavor (c,b) Collectivity – Light  Flavor (u,d,s) Thermalization at RHIC Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook 1 Arkadij Taranenko Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky, MT February 12-17,2007 Nuclear Chemistry Group SUNY Stony Brook,

R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook 1 Arkadij Taranenko Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky, MT February 12-17,2007 Nuclear Chemistry Group SUNY Stony Brook,
RHIC & AGS Annual User’s Meeting, May 2003 Nu Xu 1 Recent Results from STAR Nu Xu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory For the STAR Collaboration.

RHIC & AGS Annual User’s Meeting, May 2003 Nu Xu 1 Recent Results from STAR Nu Xu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory For the STAR Collaboration.
Identified particle transverse momentum distributions in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at RHIC 刘海东 中国科技大学.

Identified particle transverse momentum distributions in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at RHIC 刘海东 中国科技大学.
2010/10/18ATHIC2010, Oct 18-20, Wuhan1 Systematic study of particle spectra in heavy-ion collisions using Tsallis statistics Ming Shao, Zebo Tang, Yi Li,

2010/10/18ATHIC2010, Oct 18-20, Wuhan1 Systematic study of particle spectra in heavy-ion collisions using Tsallis statistics Ming Shao, Zebo Tang, Yi Li,
Heavy Quark Probes of QCD Matter at RHIC Huan Zhong Huang University of California at Los Angeles ICHEP-2004 Beijing, 2004.

Heavy Quark Probes of QCD Matter at RHIC Huan Zhong Huang University of California at Los Angeles ICHEP-2004 Beijing, 2004.
Physics of High Baryon Density,Trento, May 29  June 2, 2006 1 Charm with STAR Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg A. Dainese, X. Dong, J. Faivre, Y.

Physics of High Baryon Density,Trento, May 29  June 2, Charm with STAR Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg A. Dainese, X. Dong, J. Faivre, Y.
RNM meeting FIAS, Frankfurt, 22 Feb 2006 1 Hunt for the QGP at RHIC Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg S. Blyth, A. Dainese, T. Dietel, X. Dong, J.

RNM meeting FIAS, Frankfurt, 22 Feb Hunt for the QGP at RHIC Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg S. Blyth, A. Dainese, T. Dietel, X. Dong, J.
R. L. Thews Hard Probes 2004 Lisbon QUARKONIUM FORMATION IN STATISTICAL AND KINETIC MODELS R. L. THEWS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA HARD PROBES 2004 LISBON November.

R. L. Thews Hard Probes 2004 Lisbon QUARKONIUM FORMATION IN STATISTICAL AND KINETIC MODELS R. L. THEWS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA HARD PROBES 2004 LISBON November.
DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, 2003 1 Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.

DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.
STAR Patricia Fachini 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Motivation Data Analysis Results Conclusions Resonance Production in Au+Au and p+p Collisions at.

STAR Patricia Fachini 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Motivation Data Analysis Results Conclusions Resonance Production in Au+Au and p+p Collisions at.
ISMD, Paraty, Brazil, Sep 2  Sep 8, 2006 Kai Schweda 1 D – D Correlations as a Sensitive Probe of Light – quark Thermalization Kai Schweda, University.

ISMD, Paraty, Brazil, Sep 2  Sep 8, 2006 Kai Schweda 1 D – D Correlations as a Sensitive Probe of Light – quark Thermalization Kai Schweda, University.
03/14/2006WWND2006 at La Jolla1 Identified baryon and meson spectra at intermediate and high p T in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Outline: Motivation Intermediate.

03/14/2006WWND2006 at La Jolla1 Identified baryon and meson spectra at intermediate and high p T in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Outline: Motivation Intermediate.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google