1. Overview of Transboundary Air Management in North America Gothenburg Protocol and Review 20 September 2006 Nav Khera and Kimber Scavo

2. 2 Outline I.U.S. and Canadian commitments in the Gothenburg Protocol II.Response to Gothenburg: Canada-U.S. Ozone Annex III.Commitments and progress on Ozone and Acid Rain I.US II.Canada IV.Next Steps: Ground Level Ozone, Acidification and PM

3. 3 I. U.S. and Canadian Commitments in the Gothenburg Protocol Ozone: Canada and the U.S.: achieve ozone air quality standards and define a PEMA Canada: 2010 Ceilings for NOx and VOC in the PEMA U.S.: Requirements for NOx and VOC reductions in the PEMA Acid Rain: Canada: achieve critical loads and set new 2010 ceilings for SO2 in the SOMA U.S.: Implement the Title IV Acid Rain program Eutrophication: no commitments for either country under Gothenburg Protocol

4. 4 II. Response to Gothenburg for Ozone: Canada-U.S. Ozone Annex Added to the 1991 Canada-United States Air Quality Agreement in 2000 to address ground-level ozone Represents Canadian and U.S. efforts to address ground-level ozone under the Gothenburg Protocol –Establishes the ozone air quality standards in U.S. and Canada as the long-term objective –Defines the PEMA –Defines the NOx and VOC reductions in the PEMA

5. 5 Ozone Concentrations, 2004-2006, in the Canada-U.S. border region Ozone Concentrations in the Border Region 2004-2006 (Three-Year Average of the Annual 4th-Highest Daily Maximum 8-Hour Average)

6. 6 Pollution Emission Management Area

7. 7 III. Ozone Annex – U.S. Control Requirements United States: Key Commitments/Specific Obligations NOx transport regional emission reduction program. Resulted in 70% reduction from 1990 levels from power plants and industrial boilers in summer, 2004 U.S. vehicle, non-road engine, and fuel quality rules for VOC and NOx reductions U.S. rules to control hazardous air pollutants from stationary sources and VOC from consumer and commercial products, architectural coatings, and automobile repair coatings New source performance standards to achieve VOC and NOx reductions

8. 8 Emission Reductions in PEMA by 2010: United States

9. 9 U.S. Emission Trends for NOx in PEMA: 1990-2004

10. 10 U.S. Emission Trends for VOC in PEMA : 1990-2004

11. 11

12. 12 Response to Gothenburg for Acid Rain: United States Implement the Acid Rain Program Employs a cap and trade mechanism to achieve a permanent national cap of 8.95 million tons of SO2 per year for the electric power sector by 2010. To date, power sector has reduced SO2 emissions by over 5.5 million tons, or 35 percent, from 1990 levels Requires reduction of annual SO2 emissions from all sources by 10 million tons from 1980 levels in accordance with Title IV of the CAA. To date, reductions from all sources total about 11.3 million tons in 2005, or 44 percent from 1980 levels Also achieves NOx reductions from (EGUs) that meet and exceed the annual 2 million ton reduction goal from what emission levels would have been without the program.

13. 13

14. 14 III. Ozone Annex – Canadian Control Requirements Canada: Key Commitments/Specific Obligations New vehicles, non-road engines, and fuels regulations for VOC and NOx at the same levels as U.S. rules NOx emission reductions from electricity generators in the PEMA comparable to those in the U.S. PEMA Further emission reductions for VOC and NOx in the PEMA if necessary to achieve the ozone Canada-wide Standard

15. 15 Emission Reductions in PEMA by 2010: Canada

16. 16 Canadian Emission Trends for NOx in PEMA: 1990-2004

17. 17 Canadian Emission Trends for VOC in PEMA: 1990-2004

18. 18 Response to Gothenburg for Acid Rain: Canada Canada-wide Acid Rain Post 2000 Strategy Make progress toward critical loads for wet sulphate deposition in eastern Canada through: Emission reductions in eastern Canadian provinces by 2010 beyond their 1985 Eastern Canada Acid Rain Program targets –Quebec: 50% from 500kt by 2010 –New Brunswick: 50% from 175kt by 2010 –Nova Scotia: 50% from 189kt by 2010 –Ontario: 50% from 885kt by 2015

19. 19 Canadian SOMA

20. 20 Sulphur reductions in Canadian SOMA SOMA CAP 2004 - 38% reduction since 1990 2010 projected reduction - 51% since 1990

21. 21 Progress in Reducing Acid Deposition in Eastern North America In eastern North America, SO 2 emissions declined by ~ 34% between 1985 and 2001. During the same period, however, NO X emissions have been relatively constant (-4%). Graphic: Five-year mean SO 2 - wet deposition maps show that area receiving > 20 kg/ha/yr greatly reduced as a result of emission reductions 1990-19941996-2000

22. 22 IV. Next Steps: Ground Level Ozone Under the Canada-U.S. Air Quality Agreement, the science Subcommittee will assess current emission reductions against achievement of the air quality standards and report to the Gothenburg Review in April 2007 The Ozone Annex of this Agreement has been effective in addressing ground level ozone Canada and the U.S. will continue to use this vehicle to achieve further reductions

23. 23 Next Steps: Acid Rain and Particulate Matter U.S. – Canada Transboundary PM Science Assessment Key Findings: Evidence illustrates transboundary flow of PM and PM precursors Key transboundary pollutants of concern are primary PM precursors: SO2 and NOx, with NH3 and select VOCs in certain areas. A significant transboundary region is influenced by the transboundary flow of PM and PM precursors The west (including the Midwest) is emerging as an area of concern Joint efforts to address PM will also further reduce acidifying pollutants (precursor pollutants are the same). Additional information available at: http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/usca/transboundary/transboundary.pdf

24. Slide to be provided.

25. 25 Additional Information: Additional information on progress under the Canada- U.S. agreement can be found: in the U.S. at: http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progsregs/index.html in Canada at: www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/can_us/canus_links_e.cfm