1. Welcome and Presentation of Charge Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee (http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/Fermilab_AAC_mtgs.htm) May 10-12, 2005

2. S. Holmes, Page 2 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 The Current Landscape: Update Since November 2004 Meeting Run II –Completed 2004 shutdown and initiated FY2005 run.  FY2005 luminosity goals established at 480 pb -1 (design) and 370 pb -1 (base)  Many stores above >1  10 32 cm -2 sec -1 (  20 running average at 9.5  10 32 )  ~10 days ahead of “design” projection  Operating in combination (Accumulator+Recycler) mode –Initiated electron cooling commissioning after the 2004 shutdown  Full energy (4.5 MeV) operation of the Pelletron established  Electron beam through the Recycler cooling section  Integration in FY2006 run Neutrinos –MiniBoone FY2004 run surpassed 5.0E20 protons on target on April 3. –NuMI operations initiated in February  Target water leak took us off the air for ~1 month

3. S. Holmes, Page 3 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 The Current Landscape Initial Luminosity (through 5/1/05)

4. S. Holmes, Page 4 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 The Current Landscape: Update Since November 2004 Meeting The Future –BTev cancellation  Tevatron operations cease end of FY2009 –SMTF proposal received and under evaluation at Fermilab –Proton Driver Director’s Review in March http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/DirReviews/Dir'sRev_TechnicalReviewoftheProtonDriver_0315.html Changes in Accelerator Advisory Committee Membership –Sami Tantawi sitting in for Ron Ruth at the meeting –Gunther Geschonke, Kwang-Je Kim, and Tor Raubenheiemer sitting in as part of the incoming rotation for the November meeting –Hasan Padamsee part of the incoming rotation but here as advisee, not advisor

5. S. Holmes, Page 5 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 The Current Landscape: Fermilab View of SMTF Fermilab Long Range Plan: –Compete to host the ILC –If delayed or constructed elsewhere mount a world-best neutrino program SMTF program will move forward most expeditiously if we package those elements of direct interest to Fermilab and DOE/OHEP: –ILC –Proton Driver SCRF Goals: –Develop US capability in cavity and cryomodule fabrication in support of a potential ILC decision to construct in 2010. (Plan A) –Develop capability to initiate Proton Driver construction near the end of the decade. (Plan B) –(First branch point is ILC CDR, 18-24 months out.) Timeframe: FY2005-09

6. S. Holmes, Page 6 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 The Current Landscape: Fermilab View of SMTF Fermilab organizational approach –Two facilities  Superconducting Module Test Facility  Cavity/Cryomodule Fabrication Facility –Two customers  ILC  Proton Driver –One hybird  Photoinjector

7. S. Holmes, Page 7 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 Charge to the Committee (Rev. 4) Fermilab has received a proposal for the construction and operation of a Superconducting Module Test Facility at Fermilab. The associated development and testing program would support the International Linear Collider and Proton Driver R&D programs, both of direct interest to Fermilab, and other superconducting rf based programs of potential interest within the DOE and NSF. Fermilab is currently evaluating this proposal with a goal of forwarding to the funding agencies a specific proposal for support of the ILC and Proton Driver programs. Such a proposal needs to reflect the interests and goals of Fermilab, the collaborating institutions, the ILC Global Design Effort, and the agencies. The May 2005 AAC meeting will concentrate on evaluation of the goals, scope, and planning for the ILC and Proton Driver programs within the SMTF context. The Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee is asked to review, comment on, and offer recommendations as appropriate with particular attention in the following areas:

8. S. Holmes, Page 8 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 Charge to the Committee (Rev. 4) International Linear Collider Review the goals of the ILC component of SMTF. As presented do the elements form the basis of a program which will allow the U.S. to establish the technical capabilities in SCRF required to support a bid to host the ILC? Please also consider the following areas and offer comment as appropriate: –The “deliverables” that the ILC GDE can expect to receive from this program and their projected influence on the ILC design and/or preparations for construction. –The strategic approach outlined for cryomodule production and testing in view of the existing capabilities within the national laboratories and universities, and the adequacy of the proposed supporting infrastructure and resources. –The relationship between the SMTF plan and a more comprehensive U.S. industrialization plan in support of ILC construction. –The role of the photoinjector and its upgrades within the ILC program.

9. S. Holmes, Page 9 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 Charge to the Committee (Rev. 4) Proton Driver Review the goals of the Proton Driver component of SMTF. Identify elements that form the core of a program which would allow Fermilab to establish the technical basis required for a construction start near the end of the decade. Comment on the strategic approach outlined and the adequacy of the proposed supporting infrastructure and resources. Fine Print As usual the committee is invited to issue comments or suggestions on any aspect of the programs discussed beyond those specifically included in this charge. It is requested that a concise report responsive to this charge be forwarded to the Fermilab Director by June 17, 2005. Thank you.