Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

2 ATP 2 County Crash Data Overview 06/25/2012 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, 2007-2011 Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 5 Year Crashes ATP 2 7,505 301 5 Year Crashes ATP 2 7,505 301 State System 3,963 – 53% 128 – 43% State System 3,963 – 53% 128 – 43% CSAH/CR 1,705 – 23% 139 – 46% CSAH/CR 1,705 – 23% 139 – 46% Rural 1,353 – 79% 131 – 94% Rural 1,353 – 79% 131 – 94% Urban 352 – 21% 8 – 6% Urban 352 – 21% 8 – 6% All Way Stop 3 – 2% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 3 – 2% 0 – 0% Run off Road 461 – 67% 51 – 65% Run off Road 461 – 67% 51 – 65% On Curve 153 – 33% 23 – 45% On Curve 153 – 33% 23 – 45% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 42 (48%), 1 (50%) “Other” – 8 (9%), 1 (50%) Left Turn – 12 (14%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 6 (7%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 42 (48%), 1 (50%) “Other” – 8 (9%), 1 (50%) Left Turn – 12 (14%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 6 (7%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 88 – 60% 2 – 100% Thru-Stop 88 – 60% 2 – 100% Rear End – 12 (25%), 0 (0%) Ran Off Road – 9 (19%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 8 (17%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 4 (8%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 12 (25%), 0 (0%) Ran Off Road – 9 (19%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 8 (17%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 4 (8%), 0 (0%) Signalized 8 – 5% 0 – 0% Signalized 8 – 5% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 317 –28% 41 – 33% Inters-Related 317 –28% 41 – 33% City, Twnshp, Other 1,837 – 24% 34 – 11% City, Twnshp, Other 1,837 – 24% 34 – 11% Inters-Related 147 – 42% 2 – 25% Inters-Related 147 – 42% 2 – 25% Not Inters-Related 126 – 36% 5 – 63% Not Inters-Related 126 – 36% 5 – 63% Run Off Road – 32 (25%), 2 (40%) Head On/SS Opp – 10 (8%), 2 (40%) Rear End – 33 (26%), 1 (20%) Right Angle – 10 (8%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 32 (25%), 2 (40%) Head On/SS Opp – 10 (8%), 2 (40%) Rear End – 33 (26%), 1 (20%) Right Angle – 10 (8%), 0 (0%) Animal 204 – 15% 7 – 5% Animal 204 – 15% 7 – 5% Not Inters-Related 692 – 60% 79 – 64% Not Inters-Related 692 – 60% 79 – 64% Head On, SS Opp 47 – 7% 13 – 16% Head On, SS Opp 47 – 7% 13 – 16% On Curve 16 – 34% 4 – 31% On Curve 16 – 34% 4 – 31% Unknown/Other 79 – 22% 1 – 12% Unknown/Other 79 – 22% 1 – 12% Unknown/Other 140 – 12% 4 – 3% Unknown/Other 140 – 12% 4 – 3% Other/Unknown 48 – 33% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 48 – 33% 0 – 0% Right Angle – 50 (31%), 17 (55%) “Other” – 39 (24%), 8 (26%) Rear End – 20 (12%), 2 (6%) Run Off Road – 16 (10%), 1 (3%) Right Angle – 50 (31%), 17 (55%) “Other” – 39 (24%), 8 (26%) Rear End – 20 (12%), 2 (6%) Run Off Road – 16 (10%), 1 (3%) Thru-Stop 161 – 51% 31 – 76% Thru-Stop 161 – 51% 31 – 76% Run Off Road – 49 (34%), 5 (56%) Right Angle – 14 (10%), 2 (22%) “Other” – 29 (20%), 1 (11%) “Not Coded” – 1 (1%), 1 (11%) Run Off Road – 49 (34%), 5 (56%) Right Angle – 14 (10%), 2 (22%) “Other” – 29 (20%), 1 (11%) “Not Coded” – 1 (1%), 1 (11%) Other/Unknown 143 – 45% 9 –22% Other/Unknown 143 – 45% 9 –22% Not Animal 1,149 – 85% 124 – 95% Not Animal 1,149 – 85% 124 – 95% All Way Stop 7 – 2% 1 – 2% All Way Stop 7 – 2% 1 – 2% Signalized 6 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 6 – 2% 0 – 0%

3 6/25/20123 Red Lake County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, 2007-2011 -- Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 5 Year Crashes Red Lake 101 7 5 Year Crashes Red Lake 101 7 State System 60 – 59% 3 – 43% State System 60 – 59% 3 – 43% CSAH/CR 34 – 34% 4 – 57% CSAH/CR 34 – 34% 4 – 57% Rural 28 – 82% 4 – 100% Rural 28 – 82% 4 – 100% Urban 6 – 18% 0 – 0% Urban 6 – 18% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 0 – 0% All Way Stop 0 – 0% On Curve 0 – 0% On Curve 0 – 0% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 1 (100%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 1 – 50% 0 – 0% Thru-Stop 1 – 50% 0 – 0% Unknown – 1 (100%), 0 (0%) Signalized 0 – 0% Signalized 0 – 0% Inters-Related 7 –35% 1 – 33% Inters-Related 7 –35% 1 – 33% City, Twnshp, Other 7 – 7% 0 – 0% City, Twnshp, Other 7 – 7% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 2 – 33% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 2 – 33% 0 – 0% Not Inters-Related 3 – 50% 0 – 0% Not Inters-Related 3 – 50% 0 – 0% Run Off Road – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Animal 8 – 29% 1 – 25% Animal 8 – 29% 1 – 25% Not Inters-Related 11 – 55% 2 – 67% Not Inters-Related 11 – 55% 2 – 67% Head On, SS Opp 1 – 9% 0 – 0% Head On, SS Opp 1 – 9% 0 – 0% On Curve 0 – 0% On Curve 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 1 – 17% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 1 – 17% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 2 – 10% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 2 – 10% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 1 – 50% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 1 – 50% 0 – 0% Right Angle – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 3 – 43% 0 – 0% Thru-Stop 3 – 43% 0 – 0% “Other” – 2 (50%), 1 (100%) Run Off Road – 2 (50%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 2 (50%), 1 (100%) Run Off Road – 2 (50%), 0 (0%) Other/Unknown 4 – 57% 1 – 100% Other/Unknown 4 – 57% 1 – 100% Not Animal 20 – 71% 3 – 75% Not Animal 20 – 71% 3 – 75% All Way Stop 0 – 0% All Way Stop 0 – 0% Signalized 0 – 0% Signalized 0 – 0% Run off Road 7 – 64% 1 – 50% Run off Road 7 – 64% 1 – 50%

4 Red Lake County Crash Data Overview ATP 2 Crash Data Rural Crashes 94% of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in rural areas. Non-Intersection Related Crashes 64% of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are non-intersection related. o 65% of these are road departure crashes, 45% of which occurred on a curve. Intersection Related Crashes 33% of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are intersection related. o 76% of these crashes occurred at a thru-STOP intersection. Red Lake County Crash Data Rural Crashes 100% of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in rural areas. o 67% (2 crashes) of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are non-intersection related (1 run off the road crash). o 33% (1 crash) of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are intersection related (1 unknown). 6/25/20124

5 Red Lake County Emphasis Areas 6/25/20125 Red Lake County Emphasis Areas Emphasis Area Statewide Percentage ATP 2Red Lake County Interstate, US & THCSAH & CR City, Twnshp & Other Interstate, US & THCSAH & CR City, Twnshp & Other Total Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes8,300142 47361 Drivers Young drivers (under 21)24%23%(32)27%(38)36%(17)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Unlicensed drivers8%18%(25)8%(11)9%(4)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Older drivers (over 64)14%20%(28)12%(17)6%(3)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Aggressive driving and speeding-related20%17%(24)21%(30)32%(15)33%(1)33%(2)0%(0) Drug and alcohol-related26%35%(49)44%(62)45%(21)100%(3)100%(6)0%(0) Inattentive, distracted, asleep drivers20%22%(31)15%(21)13%(6)33%(1)17%(1)0%(0) Safety awareness- ------------ Unbelted vehicle occupants25%36%(51)51%(72)32%(15)100%(3)50%(3)100%(1) Special Users Pedestrians crashes8%6%(9)2%(3)2%(1)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Bicycle crashes4%1%(2)0%(0)4%(2)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Vehicles Motorcycles crashes16%8%(11)11%(16)26%(12)0%(0)33%(2)0%(0) Heavy vehicle crashes10%17%(24)12%(17)2%(1)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Safety enhancements- ------------ Highways Train-vehicle collisions0% (0)1%(2)6%(3)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Road departure crashes28%32%(46)45%(64)45%(21)33%(1)50%(3)100%(1) Consequences of leaving road- ------------ Intersection crashes42%45%(64)30%(43)34%(16)0%(0)17%(1)0%(0) Head-On and Sideswipe (opposite) crashes15% (21)15%(22)19%(9)0%(0)17%(1)0%(0) Work zone crashes2%0%(0)2%(3)0%(0)0%(0)17%(1)0%(0) EMSEnhancing Emergency Capabilities- ------------ Management Information and decision support systems- ------------ More effective processes- ------------ DPS Crash Data Records, 2006 to 2010 Top Emphasis Areas by Jurisdiction Note: Numbers are not additive, as one crash may involve a young driver at an intersection. The numbers represent severe crashes (Fatal and A-type Injury crashes)

6 Safety Workshop Objective: Multidisciplinary discussion of a short list of safety strategies (Note: there is no discussion of specific crash locations.) Date: July 26 Location: U of M Crookston – Youngquist Auditorium Agenda 8:30 AM – Coffee and Registration 9:00 AM – Introductions o Presentations – Law Enforcement and Local Safety Advocates o Background Information/Desired Outcomes o Breakout Sessions – Prioritize Strategies 12:00 – 1:00 PM - Lunch o Report Back/Final Presentation 2:45 – 3:00 PM - Wrap-up 6/25/20126

7 7 Red Lake County’s Sample Invite

8 6/25/20128 Safety Workshop – County Assignments April/May Confirm groups and select group leaders Select dates June Secure Location and Caterer – Group Coordinator 50-100 people $12/person (“all in” including delivery, tax and tip) Send invites (example has been provided) July All Counties: RSVP Head Count to Rich Sanders by July 16th Group Coordinator (Rich): Confirm final headcount by July 17th Group Coordinator (Rich): E-mail Carla Stueve (SRF) at cstueve@srfconsulting.comcstueve@srfconsulting.com Provide final headcount Audio-visual availability for the workshop


Download ppt "1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google