Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBruce Murphy Modified over 9 years ago
1
Regression Usman Roshan CS 675 Machine Learning
2
Regression Same problem as classification except that the target variable y i is continuous. Popular solutions – Linear regression (perceptron) – Support vector regression – Logistic regression (for regression)
3
Linear regression Suppose target values are generated by a function y i = f(x i ) + e i We will estimate f(x i ) by g(x i,θ). Suppose each e i is being generated by a Gaussian distribution with 0 mean and σ 2 variance (same variance for all e i ). This implies that the probability of y i given the input x i and variables θ (denoted as p(y i |x i,θ) is normally distributed with mean g(x i,θ) and variance σ 2.
4
Linear regression Apply maximum likelihood to estimate g(x, θ) Assume each (x i,y i ) i.i.d. Then probability of data given model (likelihood) is P(X|θ) = p(x 1,y 1 )p(x 2,y 2 )…p(x n,y n ) Each p(x i,y i )=p(y i |x i )p(x i ) p(y i |x i ) is normally distributed with mean g(x i,θ) and variance σ 2
5
Linear regression Maximizing the log likelihood (like for classification) gives us least squares (linear regression) From Alpaydin 2010
6
Ridge regression Regularized linear regression also known as ridge regression Minimize: Has been used in statistics for a long time to address singularity problems in linear regression. Linear regression (or least squares) solution is also given (X T X) -1 X T y Ridge regression is given by (X T X+λI) -1 X T y
7
Logistic regression Similar to linear regression derivation Here we predict with the sigmoid function instead of a linear function We still minimize sum of squares between predicted and actual value Output y i is constrained in the range [0,1]
8
Support vector regression Makes no assumptions about probability distribution of the data and output (like support vector machine). Change the loss function in the support vector machine problem to the e-sensitive loss to obtain support vector regression
9
Support vector regression Solved by applying Lagrange multipliers like in SVM Solution w is given by a linear combination of support vectors (like in SVM) The solution w can also be used for ranking features. From a risk minimization perspective the loss would be From a regularized perspective it is
10
Applications Prediction of continuous phenotypes in mice from genotype (Predicting unobserved phen…)Predicting unobserved phen Data are vectors x i where each feature takes on values 0, 1, and 2 to denote number of alleles of a particular single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Data has about 1500 samples and 12,000 SNPs Output y i is a phenotype value. For example coat color (represented by integers), chemical levels in blood
11
Mouse phenotype prediction from genotype Rank SNPs by Wald test – First perform linear regression y = wx + w 0 – Calculate p-value on w using t-test t-test: (w-w null )/stderr(w)) w null = 0 T-test: w/stderr(w) stderr(w) given by Σ i (y i -wx i -w 0 ) 2 /(x i -mean(x i )) – Rank SNPs by p-values – OR by Σ i (y i -wx i -w 0 ) Rank SNPs by Pearson correlation coefficient Rank SNPs by support vector regression (w vector in SVR) Rank SNPs by ridge regression (w vector) Run SVR and ridge regression on top k ranked SNP under cross-validation.
12
CD8 phenotype in mice From Al-jouie and Roshan, ICMLA workshop, 2015
13
MCH phenotype in mice
14
Fly startle response time prediction from genotype Same experimental study as previously Using whole genome sequence data to predict quantitative trait phenotypes in Drosophila Melanogaster Using whole genome sequence data to predict quantitative trait phenotypes in Drosophila Melanogaster Data has 155 samples and 2 million SNPs (features)
15
Fly startle response time
16
Rice phenotype prediction from genotype Same experimental study as previously Improving the Accuracy of Whole Genome Prediction for Complex Traits Using the Results of Genome Wide Association Studies Improving the Accuracy of Whole Genome Prediction for Complex Traits Using the Results of Genome Wide Association Studies Data has 413 samples and 36901 SNPs (features) Basic unbiased linear prediction (BLUP) method improved by prior SNP knowledge (given in genome-wide association studies)
17
Different rice phenotypes
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.