1. Review and Enhancement Process reports Ruth Carter

2. Process Prepare report –Collaborative REP proforma –Deadlines: report submitted by end October – your link will provide exact date –For 2011 report, reports based on experiences and evidence from 2010/11 –Attach required appendices Approved by programme committee Final report considered by SQSC, reviewed and approved Report and SQSC minutes considered also by Collaborations Monitoring sub-Committee Feedback from your UEL link Once approved, action plan should become a live plan

3. Indicative evidence Last years REP and action plan Programme committee minutes External examiner reports and your responses Student data – student profile, achievement, employment Statistical data by module Module feedback results and module reports Validation and Review reports Notes on changes to programmes during the year Student evaluations at programme level (eg NSS) and action taken in response to student feedback Staff development and staffing changes Feedback from employers, placement reports, professional body reports (if relevant)

4. What makes a good report? Highlights positive features Reflective and analytical, ie evaluative, rather than descriptive, discusses the evidence Identifies problems and suggests solutions Contains a clear SMART action plan Is complete ie no gaps

5. Next steps How will you ensure that the action plan is implemented? Involving and feeding back to students