Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 2003 – 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results Data by Student Groups.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 2003 – 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results Data by Student Groups."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 2003 – 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results Data by Student Groups

2 2 2008 Accountability Ratings for NEISD RATINGHIGHMIDDLEELEM.TOTAL EXEMPLARY13151931% RECOGNIZED14 232845% ACCEPTABLE5641524% ACADEMICALLY UNACCEPTABLE00000% TOTAL7134262100% EXEMPLARY/RECOGNIZED 28.6%53.8%90.5%75.8%

3 3 Major Highlights 75% of all NEISD Campuses rated Exemplary or Recognized More than 90% of Elementary Campuses are rated Exemplary or Recognized 27% Increase in Exemplary campuses Once again, NEISD has more Exemplary campuses than any other district in Bexar County

4 4 Major Highlights 2008 TAKS passing rates increased in every subject for every student group Marked improvement in Science for African Americans (+13%), Hispanic(+11%), and Economic Disadvantaged (13%)

5 5 Are There Gaps in Student Achievement?

6 6  NO GAPS  All Hispanic  All White  All African American  All Economically Disadvantaged  All Special Education Students  All Limited English Proficient (LEP) Equity and Excellence for All Students

7 7 –All children are capable of high levels of academic success; –Academic success equitably includes all student groups; –Adults in schools are primarily responsible; –Traditional school practices result in inequity and must be changed. Core Beliefs

8 8 Process of Finding the Gaps Look at current year results and compare them to prior years –Disaggregate by student groups –Close attention to ethnic groups and special populations –Use a variety of tabular and graphic formats Look at our progress in closing gaps over time Examine within and across ethnic groups and special populations to determine the extent of gaps

9 9 2008 District Accountability Rating

10 10 % = % Pass All = Total W=White H =Hispanic AA = Afr. American ED=Eco. Disadvantaged

11 11 High Schools What are educationally important differences - District ± 3%

12 12 TAKS Reading/ELA Achievement GAPS:2003 - 2008

13 13 TAKS Writing Achievement Gaps: 2003 - 2008

14 14 TAKS Social Studies Achievement GAPS: 2003 - 2008

15 15 TAKS Science Achievement Gaps: 2003 - 2008

16 16 TAKS Math Achievement Gaps: 2003 - 2008

17 17 13 11 14

18 18 -10 -4 4

19 19 -9 7

20 20

21 21 Bottom Line It is not about the gaps. Our goal is to make certain each and every child receives a quality education and is prepared for college and workforce readiness. NEISD Where Every Child Is Prepared for the Future

22 22 The End

23 23 Preliminary 2008 AEIS Accountability Ratings: Elementary School Exemplary Recognized Acceptable 1604

24 24 Preliminary 2008 AEIS Accountability Ratings: Middle School Exemplary Recognized Acceptable 1604

25 25 Preliminary 2008 AEIS Accountability Ratings: High School Exemplary Recognized Acceptable Note: ISA is Exemplary 1604


Download ppt "1 2003 – 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results Data by Student Groups."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google