Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT"— Presentation transcript:

1 Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT
L. Jochum, N. Hubin, E. Vernet, P.-Y. Madec, M. Dimmler, M. Mueller, B.Sedghi

2 Outline E-ELT optics layout E-ELT AO components Main axes control
Field Stabilization Unit Adaptive Unit Conclusions

3 5 mirror adaptive telescope
E-ELT Optics Layout Surface shape Diameter (mm) Distance (mm) M1 Concave ellipse 42000 36500 M2 Convex hyperbola 5691 M3 Concave sphere 4032 13645 M4 flat 2636 x 2587 10000 M5 2978 x 2388 5 mirror adaptive telescope

4 E-ELT AO components Disturbers Task for E-ELT pre-focal AO
Atmospheric turbulence Windload Gravity and thermal effects Task for E-ELT pre-focal AO real time wave front correction for the E-ELT focal plane, reaching diffraction limit of the telescope in the NIR Correction devices Telescope main axes control Field stabilization mirror Adaptive mirror Wave front sensing systems NGS, LGS, laser sources, beam transport and launch, WFS, RTC

5 Main axes control Residual of main axes control  input disturbance for image stabilization

6 M5 – Field Stabilization Unit
Task: Tip tilt correction for image stabilization Components: Mirror Field stabilization system Mounting structure Control system Auxiliary Equipment Incoming disturbance: 1” rms residual tip tilt Dominated by wind shaking Conservative assumptions: 10m/s wind 10 m No dome 30% safety margin

7 M5 correction Required output Residual on sky tip-tilt:
< 0.07” rms (goal 0.06”) over the entire frequency range < 0.004” rms for [9Hz to ] all peaks < 2σ Conditions: WFS sampling: 100Hz RON no noise WFS delay 10 ms RTC delay 1 ms Phase margin >45 deg Modulus margin >0.6 Communication with RTC [ ]Hz E-ELT control simulation: main axes + M5 Remaining wave front correction  adaptive mirror with positioning system

8 M4 – Adaptive Unit Components: Tasks: correction of…
Adaptive mirror, Positioning system, Mounting structure, Control system, Auxiliary Equipment Tasks: correction of… …small amplitude residual tip-tilt …high order wavefront (real-time) Atmosphere wind shake low spatial frequency telescope errors …large amplitude low frequency tip-tilt …lateral pupil position Telescope gravity Thermal load adapter tracking wobble & run-out errors Nasmyth foci selection Adaptive mirror Positioning system (4 DoF)

9 M4 positioning system requirements
Pupil Lateral correction Range (mm) ± 20 mm Min Continuous speed (mm/s) speed ≥ 1 mm/s Absolute accuracy (µm) ≤ 100 µm Resolution (µm) ≤ 50 µm Bandwidth (Hz) > 1 Hz Mechanical tilt correction Range (") ± 120 (±14" on sky) Speed ("/s) 10 (1.2"/s on sky) Absolute accuracy (") 0.5 (0.06" on-sky) Resolution (") 0.25 (0.03" on-sky) Cross coupling Between Tip & tilt (mech ") 0.25 Between lateral & tilt (mech ") over full range Between lateral & tilt (mech ") during any time period of 0.2 s 0.025 Between tilt & lateral (µm) < 50 Between two lateral (µm)

10 Adaptive mirror main requirements
Fitting error: 145 nm rms (goal 110) Temporal error: 60 nm rms (goal 43) Tip-tilt after M4: kHz WFS sampling Total stroke defined for worst seeing conditions (2.5arcsec seeing, 100 m outer scale) Optical quality, mass, power consumption, dynamic behavior, passive stability (lookup tables), environment, …. High reliability (key element for E ELT) under median seeing conditions

11 Required tip-tilt correction after M4
Incomming disturbance: 0.119” residual on sky rms after telescope & M5 correction Wavefront sensor sampling frequency (Hz) Loop delay ms Res. on-sky tip-tilt errors (mas rms) 100 11 9 290 4.5 3.5 700 2.4 1.6 1000 2 1.3 1200 1.8 E-ELT control simulation: main axes + M5 + M4 Conservative assumptions: 10m/s wind 10 m Exponential wind profile No dome 30% safety margin in original data

12 3 step disturbance correction
Telescope main axes control Remaining tip tilt < 1” rms M5 Low frequency, high stroke M4 High frequency, low stroke 1.3 mas residual rms error compatible with diffraction limit in NIR

13 Conclusions E-ELT will be an adaptive telescope, NIR diffraction limited In-built Field stabilization mirror In-built adaptive mirror Demanding requirements pushing state of the art technology Feasibility studies, conceptual and preliminary design, breadboarding and prototyping of critical components carried out by industry under ESO contracts 16h00 Armando Riccardi, 16h40 : Daniele Gallieni E-ELT M4AU development at Microgate 16h20 Bruno Crépy, 17h20 Jean-Christophe Sinquin E-ELT M4AU development at CILAS 17h40 Javier Barriga E-ELT M5FU development at NTE

14 c'est tout


Download ppt "Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google