Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEdith Barnett Modified over 9 years ago
1
Weixing Ding University of California, Los Angeles,USA collaborators: D.L. Brower, W. Bergerson, D. Craig, D. Demers, G.Fiksel, D.J. Den Hartog, J. Reusch, S. C. Prager, J. Sarff, T.Yates and MST team (Oct. 14, 2009 Princeton) Particle Transport due to Stochastic Magnetic Field in a High-Temperature Plasma
2
Introduction Free energy instabilities Fluctuations Particle (charge) Momentum Energy Transport J // (r) Tearing
3
Electron Density Relaxation Due to Magnetic Field Perturbation Magnetic Field Fluctuations Driven by Tearing Instabilities in MST MST L.Zeng (UCLA) et al DIII-D by reflectometry Driven by I-coil externally in DIII-D DIII-D
4
MST Reversed-Field Pinch (RFP) is toroidal configuration with relatively weak toroidal magnetic field B T ( i.e., B T ~ B p ) Madison Symmetric Torus For plasma w/o current profile control R 0 = 1.5 m, a = 0.51 m, I p ~400 kA B T ~ 3-4 kG, n e ~ 10 19 m -3,T e ~T i ~300eV ~7%
5
Fluctuations and Transport in the MST Generation of magnetic flux (dynamo) Particle and energy transport Ion heating Momentum transport Magnetic reconnection events
6
Outline (1) Density Relaxation and particle transport during reconnection; (2) Measured magnetic fluctuation-induced particle flux accounts for particle transport; GOAL: Identify the role of stochastic magnetic field in particle transport during reconnection
7
Particle Diffusion Rate in a Stochastic Magnetic Field in MST Toroidal Angle / r/a Puncture Plot of B Field in MST Magnetic diffusivity coefficient from field line tracing (Hudson and Gennady, 2006) Rechester & Rosenbluth (1978) derived a quasi-linear coefficient Harvey (1981) and Finn (1990) suggest particle diffusion rate D i ~ D m c s (or V i,th ) Plugging in MST parameters: p ~ 1-2 ms (quasi-linear estimate) in ambient case p ~ 0.1-0.2 ms (experiment) during relaxation event
8
Measured Total Particle Flux during Reconnection r L Total particle flux surges to 1.5*10 21 m -2 s -1 during reconnection
9
Fluctuation-Induced Particle Flux Contributes to Total Flux Particle transport is determined by perpendicular momentum balance Particle transport arises from particle streaming along stochastic field lines total flux pinch electrostatic magnetic fluctuation
10
Pinch and electrostatic fluctuation-induced particle flux are negligible Lei, et al. PRL 2002 total flux pinch electrostatic magnetic fluctuation electrostatic
11
Magnetic Fluctuation-Induced Particle Flux Density-fluctuation dependent flux Velocity-fluctuation dependent flux
12
Measurement of Magnetic Fluctuation-Induced Particle Flux Laser Faraday rotation B Laser Faraday rotation Laser interferometer ( ) Motion Stark effect CHERS, Mode Rotation, Ion Doppler Spectroscopy Not measured, inferred from quasi-neutrality 7 independent quantities are needed to determine electron and ion flux
13
FIR Polarimeter-Interferometer System MST Interferometer density fluctuation Faraday rotation magnetic field 11 chords, separation 8 cm,phase resolution 0.05 degree, time response up to 1 s Ding, Brower, et al PRL(2003),(2004) RSI(2004),(2008) See poster: P03-23(Bergerson)
14
Measurement of Equilibrium Magnetic Field and Current Denisty Time [ms] By Motion Stark Effect By Faraday rotation
15
Measurement of density and magnetic fluctuation Density fluctuations Radial Magnetic fluctuations m/n=1/6
16
Magnetic fluctuation-induced electron particle flux (Total Flux) Density fluctuation contributes to electron particle flux
17
Magnetic fluctuation-induced ion particle flux 1.50 0.75 Den Hartog et. Al,PoP,1999 (Ion Flux) Velocity fluctuation contributes to ion flux
18
Magnetic Fluctuation Induced Flux Balances the Change of Density Integrating over time Magnetic fluctuation induced particle transport drives density change
19
1.50 0.75 Electron and ion flux arise from different mechanism Electron flux Ion flux Total flux
20
(m,n) are poloidal and toroidal mode number Ambipolarity of Particle Transport (difference between electron and ion particle flux) Ding, et al. PRL 2007
21
Particle diffusivity is (30X) larger than QL prediction Rechester&Rosenbluth(1978) (without ambipolarity ) ~~ (30 times) Predicted Particle Transport ~Predicted Heat Transport Experimentally, particle diffusion rate is approximately electron diffusion rate in a stochastic magnetic field. Harvey (1981) (with ambipolariy)
22
Summary (1)Rapid particle transport is observed in MST associated with the stochastic field; (2) Electron particle flux is comparable to ion flux ( ), accounting for global density change during a reconnection event; (3) Particle transport is much larger than the expected from quasi-linear theory.
23
Magnetic Fluctuation Measurement Method Plasma X 1 X 2 Ding, et al. PRL (2003)
24
Localization of Density Fluctuations Physically
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.