Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Note: This PowerPoint is for the 2012-2013 Roster Verification process ONLY. It should not be.

Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Note: This PowerPoint is for the 2012-2013 Roster Verification process ONLY. It should not be used after this school year. EVAAS Roster Verification for the 2012-2013 School Year SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12

2 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Agenda  What is EVAAS Roster Verification?  When is EVAAS Roster Verification?  What is this process all about?  Where is EVAAS Roster Verification?  What and Who is Involved?  The BIG Picture: Teacher Evaluation

7 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. When is EVAAS Roster Verification?  April 15 – 21: Principal Preview Week  Timelines: Hard Deadlines Most of NC Teachers: April 22 – May 17 Principals: May 18 – May 31 District: June 1 – June 28

14 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Teachers must be able to verify their rosters since those rosters are going to be used for evaluative purposes. Those rosters initially come from NC Wise What is this process all about?

17 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Multiple Accounts  It’s common for people to have multiple accounts.  They may not realize or remember that they have multiple accounts.  If someone cannot find Roster Verification, they may need to use one of their other accounts. REMEMBER The correct username is included in the email notification when Roster Verification begins. If confused, use “Forgot username or password?” on the login page.

20 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. What and Who is Involved? Principal’s Preview Teachers Principals District SAS EVAAS NC Wise Rosters Online EVAAS Roster Verification Process March 22, 2013

22 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. What and Who is Involved? Principal’s Preview Teachers Principals District SAS EVAAS NC Wise Rosters Online EVAAS Roster Verification Process

33 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. New Term: Instructional Availability 33 IS NOT… Instructional Availability is NOT synonymous with Average Daily Membership. Instructional Availability has nothing to do with student attendance. NOTE: ADM policy rules are applied to the data after the school year is over 140 days = full academic year 70 days = full academic semester IS… Instructional Availability refers to the percentage of time the teacher was available to teach the student. Default is 100% Let’s look at some examples…

34 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Example 1: Sample Elementary School began the school year with (3) fourth grade teachers but enrollment continued to increase. In October, the school was allotted an additional position for fourth grade. Students were redistributed and assigned to the new teacher, Teacher Smith. Teacher Smith did not teach his students the entire school year. He only taught the students October through June. Teacher Smith would claim his students at 90% Instructional Availability, and the other teachers, who had the students originally at the beginning of the year, would claim them the other 10%.

35 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Example 1: Sample Elementary School began the school year with (3) fourth grade teachers but enrollment continued to increase. In October, the school was allotted an additional position for fourth grade. Students were redistributed and assigned to the new teacher, Teacher Smith. Teacher Smith did not teach his students the entire school year. He only taught the students October through June. Teacher Smith would claim his students at 90% Instructional Availability, and the other teachers, who had the students originally at the beginning of the year, would claim them the other 10%.

36 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Example 2: Teacher Jones at ABC Elementary School has a student, Jumping Johnny, in his class who is noticeably having difficulty. For four months of the school year, Teacher Jones has tried everything possible to serve Jumping Johnny including referral to the Exceptional Children’s Team. In a recent meeting Jumping Johnny has been identified with a behavioral disorder and is moving to a more restrictive environment. Beginning Monday, he will be moved from Teacher Jones’ class to Teacher Apple’s class for special services within the same school. Teacher Jones would claim 40% instructional availability for Jumping Johnny and Teacher Apple would claim him 60% for instructional availability.

37 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Example 2: Teacher Jones at ABC Elementary School has a student, Jumping Johnny, in his class who is noticeably having difficulty. For four months of the school year, Teacher Jones has tried everything possible to serve Jumping Johnny including referral to the Exceptional Children’s Team. In a recent meeting Jumping Johnny has been identified with a behavioral disorder and is moving to a more restrictive environment. Beginning Monday, he will be moved from Teacher Jones’ class to Teacher Apple’s class for special services within the same school. Teacher Jones would claim 40% instructional availability for Jumping Johnny and Teacher Apple would claim him 60% for instructional availability.

39 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. New Term: Your % of Instruction  Of the time that the teacher was available for instruction,  How much of this student’s instructional responsibility belongs with the teacher?  How much instructional responsibility belongs with another teacher? Teacher 1Teacher 2 Classroom TeacherEC Teacher Classroom Teacher N/A Classroom TeacherReading Specialist

40 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. EC Students…see IEP to guide. I teach ELA 275 minutes a week. Student sees Sano 275 minutes a week. TOTAL: Student receives 540 minutes of ELA instruction. 275/550= 50% from Prudenti275/550= 50% from Sano 100

41 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. AIG Students…MATH/ ELA Prudenti teaches 192.5 minutes/ week. Chappell teaches 82.5 minutes/week. M: 50/50T: 50/50W: 50/50R: 100/0F: 100/0 TOTAL: Student receives 275 minutes of ELA instruction. 192.5/275= 70% from Prudenti82.5/275= 30% from Chappell 100

47 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Suggestions…  Start early in the window rather than waiting until the end of the window to begin (remember deadlines are hard deadlines). Get Support:  Attend a training session hosted by your district  When logged in:  Quick Start Guides  Help link  Recorded Demo  Virtual Learning Module (when available)  Contact Us link  Attend drop-in Webex sessions (listed on login page)

Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Note: This PowerPoint is for the 2012-2013 Roster Verification process ONLY. It should not be.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Note: This PowerPoint is for the 2012-2013 Roster Verification process ONLY. It should not be."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Note: This PowerPoint is for the 2012-2013 Roster Verification process ONLY. It should not be.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Note: This PowerPoint is for the 2012-2013 Roster Verification process ONLY. It should not be."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback