Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byOswald O’Neal’ Modified over 9 years ago
1
Potential City Lights Targets 11/21/14 Cindy Combs
2
For this check, granules corresponding to a few days on either side of the new moon in June (6/23-7/01, with 6/27/14 new moon) over the US southwest were used as the sample cases. Various areas were examined, including California, Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and the Gulf of Mexico off Louisiana and Texas
3
Texas (left) has a lot of lights close together, making it difficult to single out one city/town. California was worse. The Gulf off Texas was pretty dark. So, targets in Arizona, New Mexico and off the Louisiana coast are shown
4
Arizona
5
Example of Arizona sectors on 6/24/14 Red = Phoenix Green = Flagstaff Yellow = Kingman Light Blue = Tucson These are sample areas – can be reduced to bright pixels.
6
Small Towns Flagstaff, AZKingman, AZ
7
Big Cities Phoenix, AZ Tuscon, AZ
8
New Mexico
9
Example of New Mexico sectors on 6/28/14 Red = Albuquerque Green = Socorro Yellow = Las Cruces Light Blue = Tucumcari
10
Small Towns Tucumcari, NM Socorro, NM
11
Big Cities Albuquerque, NM Las Cruces, NM
12
Gulf of Mexico Louisiana Coast
13
Example of Gulf of Mexico sector on 7/01/14 Red = Target site
14
To guarantee that lights are stationary targets and not ships, here are three passes over the same sector. The left is before new moon; the next two after. There are several that seem to be stationary, but not consistent in brightness. I have pointed in the right image what I consider the two best contenders. Potential targets
15
Overall comments: 1. Big Cities: Phoenix is a biggest target. Tucson is nice sized and compact. El Paso, TX (south of Las Cruces) is another possibility. 2. Small Towns: Socorro is compact and bright. Tucumcari is slightly bigger but also compact. Flagstaff and Kingman are a little spread out. 3.Oil Rigs: The two target I would try for are noted in slide #14
16
Further work: If any of these targets are acceptable, the next item would be to look at multiple months. That would require pulling data from Wisconsin. Do we want to pull data from previous years (2012,2013) or stick with just 2014? I’m also assuming this would be more PDF work like we did with the snow cases?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.