1. November 20, 2015 John Kownack Executive Director Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority Challenges in Meeting the Needs of Disadvantaged Families as Assisted Housing Choices Increase

2.  NRHA Vision and Mission  Rental Assistance in Norfolk  Place-Based Educational Initiatives  Assisted Housing Trends/Goals  Challenges from Housing Choice  Q & A

3. Quality housing choices in neighborhoods where you want to live. Provide quality housing opportunities that foster sustainable mixed-income communities.

4.  Of Norfolk’s 85,000 households, ◦ 33,300 have incomes less than 50% AMI ◦ 19,000 have incomes less than 30% AMI  19,000 households in Norfolk can’t afford affordable housing

5.  Assisted Rental Resources in Norfolk now serve 41% of the 19,000 households with extremely low incomes.  Since 2002, 905 public housing units in Roberts Village, Roberts Village East, Bowling Green and Moton Circle have been vacated and demolished. Type of AssistanceTotal Units Public Housing3,475 Housing Choice Vouchers2,737 Project Based Rental Assistance - NRHA 128 Subtotal - NRHA6,340 Project Based Rental Assistance – Privately Owned1,500 Totals7,840

6.  United for Children ◦ Pre-K resources and early education ◦ Anti-Brain Drain Summer School ◦ High School Health Clinic ◦ Geographic data monitoring/analysis  Community Core Teams ◦ Interagency collaboration  Challenged School Focus ◦ High proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch eligibility ◦ Low attendance (students and staff) ◦ Low test scores/high drop out rate

7. Type of Assistance200220152025 Public Housing4,4803,475 675 Housing Choice Vouchers2,1002,7373,937 Project Based Rental Assistance - NRHA 81 1281,728 Subtotal - NRHA6,6616,340 Project Based Rental Assistance – Privately Owned1,500 Totals8,1617,840  Over 10,000 households in Norfolk with extremely low incomes are not receiving rental assistance.

8. YearPopulationSchool-Aged Children 20006,4942,141 20104,9591,332 20144,5921,192 Decrease Since 2000 1,902 949

9. Blue: High Poverty Red: Low Poverty

10.  Citywide performance goals versus focused area objectives  Difficulty tracking households leaving areas of concentrated poverty  Stigmatizing of Section 8 households  Confidentiality requirements hinders collaboration  Broader network of interagency cooperation necessary  Lack of stable housing for extremely low income families not receiving housing assistance

11.  Expansion of United for Children effort beyond specific community focus  New emphasis from School Board and Administration on interagency collaboration  Steadily improving SOL scores in 3 rd, 4 th and 5 th grades  Active before and after-school programs as well as summer camp  New resources put in place to support success of housing choice