Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

E VALUATION C RITERIA & R EPORTING M ETRICS School Improvement Grant Monitoring LEA Review Process.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "E VALUATION C RITERIA & R EPORTING M ETRICS School Improvement Grant Monitoring LEA Review Process."— Presentation transcript:

1 E VALUATION C RITERIA & R EPORTING M ETRICS School Improvement Grant Monitoring LEA Review Process

2 T HE SIG M ONITORING /R EVIEW P ROCESS Data Metrics Instructional Focus Visit Cash Balance Report District Guiding Questions Annual Goals & Expectations WISE Transformation Plan Phone & In Person Interviews

3 M ONITORING SIG SDE R OLES AND R ESPONSIBILITIES Instructional Focus Visits Implementation Process Phone & In-person Interviews Cash Balance Reports Classroom Observations Teacher Interviews Admin Interviews Quarterly WISE updates Quarterly Key District/School Leaders District Guiding Questions Quarterly

4 T IMELINE OF E VALUATION C RITERIA MonthActivity Aug Previous Year Final Report District Guiding Questions Sept Initial On-site Interview Revised Annual Goals & Expectations Oct Cash Balance Report Phone Interview Nov WISE Updates Dec Mid-year On-site Interview Classroom Observation Data Jan Cash Balance Report WISE Updates MonthActivity Feb CEE Survey March Phone Interview April Cash Balance Report WISE Updates May Conclusion On-Site Interview Classroom Observation Data June Metric Data Collection July Cash Balance Report WISE Updates Metric Data Collection SDE Review of SIG

5 WISE Transformation Toolkit Implementation of Processes and Activities (Timeline) Evidence of Success or Implementation I DAHO T RANSFORMATION M ODEL D ISTRICT G UIDING Q UESTIONS Leaders & Teachers Instructional & Support Strategies Learning Time & Support School Governance

6 D ISTRICT G UIDING Q UESTIONS Teachers and Leaders Instructional and Support Strategies Learning Time and Support Governance 13 Q UESTIONS TO ASSIST WITH MONITORING & T ECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

7 CEE Survey Data Baseline Comparison Relationship to Intervention Model Student Achievement Data ( 1 st, 5 th and 9 th months) Spring ISAT IRI (if applicable) PMA (if applicable) Formative (interim) Assessment Classroom Observation Data Walkthrough information Process of implementation Schedule P ROCESS OF REVIEWING ANNUAL GOALS

8 REPORTING METRICS PURPOSE: To inform and evaluate the effectiveness of the selected interventions DATA SOURCES: EDFacts (www.ed.gov)www.ed.gov State Fiscal Stabilization Funds (SFSF) District INDICATORS: Achievement Leading Indicators DATA CATAGORIES: School Student Outcome/Academic Progress s Student Connection & School Climate Talent

9 REPORTING METRICS SCHOOL DATA Intervention Model AYP Status AYP Targets Met & Missed School Improvement Status # of minutes per school year SDE Responsibility # of minutes per school year for reading instruction # of minutes per school year for math instruction LEA/School Responsibility

10 REPORTING METRICS STUDENT OUTCOMES/ACADEMIC PROGRESS % at or above proficiency on ISAT in RD/LU/MT % participation on ISAT in RD/LU/MT Average Scale Score % ELL proficient on AMAO Graduation Rate Dropout Rate Student Attendance Rate # & % completing AP/IB coursework SDE Responsibility LEA/School Responsibility

11 REPORTING METRICS S TUDENT C ONNECTIONS & S CHOOL C LIMATE Discipline Incidents Truants SDE Collection LEA/School Collection

12 REPORTING METRICS T ALENT Distribution of teachers by performance level on LEA’s teacher evaluation Teacher attendance rate SDE Responsibility LEA/School Responsibility

13 D ETERMINATION TO RENEW AN LEA’ S SIG IF NOT MEETING A NNUAL GOALS All Student Category and for each sub-group

14 D ETERMINATION TO RENEW AN LEA’ S SIG IF NOT MEETING A NNUAL GOALS ACTIONS School’s ability to show improvement District’s ability to build capacity in school and district EVIDENCE School’s fidelity to selected intervention model Progress of School’s leading indicators IMPLEMENTATION Timeline of implementation Effectiveness of implementation Sustainability of implementation SDE will provide district with written summary of its findings.

15 D ISTRICT R ESPONSIBILITIES B ASELINE D ATA (SY 2009-2010) DUE A UGUST 1 ST, 2011 Distribution of teachers by performance level on LEA’s Teacher Evaluation (District and School) Teacher Attendance Rate (District and School) Reading Instructional Minutes (School) **2009-2010 SY and 2010-2011 SY** Math Instructional Minutes (School) **2009-2010 SY and 2010-2011 SY**

16 REPORTING METRICS B ASELINE D ATA DUE A UGUST 1 ST, 2011 District Guiding QuestionsRevised Budget for 2011-2012WISE Transformation Tool UpdatedBaseline District and School Data Send to Jodie Mills: jmills@sde.idaho.govjmills@sde.idaho.gov

17 O THER T HINGS ! Letter of Support for REL (Steve) GRA request for reimbursement (Steve) Email 1st day of School (Lisa) Go Fly Fishing (Jodie)

18 QUESTIONS? Steve Underwood - Director sunderwood@sde.idaho.gov 208-332-6922 Jodie Mills - Coordinator jmills@sde.idaho.gov 308-332-6869 Lisa Paul – Administrative Assistant lpaul@sde.idaho.gov 208-332-6942


Download ppt "E VALUATION C RITERIA & R EPORTING M ETRICS School Improvement Grant Monitoring LEA Review Process."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google