1. Contract Year 1 Review IMT Tilt Thompkins MOS - NCSA 15 May 2002

2. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review2 Program Development Approach Major Issues Addressed As NCSA Core Lead –Classified contract –Updating UI financial system after late start date –Performance and Hiring as impacted by IL State budget crisis

3. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review3 Program Development Approach Major Issues Addressed As FAPOC –Engaging T&E Community Who, where, what Level of HPC expertise – On-site performance and security – Program development barriers T&E Community has limited HPC expertise Sense that HPC/PET is trying to “tell them how to do their job” In general, 50% of the funding for a T&E center is yearly customer funds, and as a result, their time horizon is short (3 to 6 months) –Projects are of limited interest given the relatively long development time

4. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review4 Top priorities:  Application of HPC software tools and techniques with live tests and hardware-in-the-loop simulations for test and evaluation.  Tools for collecting, organizing, and combining diverse information sets to optimally guide T&E decision making. Concentrate on:  High-fidelity component and process models  Real-time model execution  Integration of information from disparate sources  Test data repositories  Optimal Test Strategy Planning  Building IMT Communities of practice  Training in new software tools & methodologies (Core) Strategic Goals for IMT

5. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review5 1.High-fidelity component and process models 2.Real-time models 3.Information Integration 3.Test data repositories 4.Optimal test planning 5.Building IMT communities of practice FY02FY03FY04FY05FY06 IMT 002 CORE IMT 002 CROSS-FA PROGRAMS IMT 006 R-T INTEROPERABILITY MODEL DATA REDUCTION FY03 PROJECT PLANNING: IMT OPT. T&E DECISION MAKING CORE TRANINING STATISTICS DATA REPOSITORIES OPT. T&E DECISION MAKING DATA REPOSITORIES

6. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review6 Technical (Metrics) User Codes Impacted by PET Logistics Common Model Deployment planning and system acquisition analysis tool TENA - Test and Training Enabling Architecture Logical Range Enabler, see Joint Test and Training Range Roadmap (JTTRR)

7. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review7 Technical (Metrics) User Contacts and Assistance HPC Users: 3. Total of 9 months duration Direct Contact: T&E working staff: 19 T&E Management: 11

8. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review8 Technical (Metrics) Tools introduced to community –Parallel LCOM Users have low HPC skills Intensive use by 3 to 5 DoD staff Logistics tail a major DoD expense and system evaluation criteria

9. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review9 Technical (Metrics) Presentations Given: 5 Conferences Held: NTR Workshops Held: NTR Seminars Held: NTR Training Held: In progress: WSMC intro to parallel programming, ATC datamining and data warehousing introduction

10. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review10 Technical (Metrics) Technical Reports and Articles –None

11. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review11 IMT 002 Deployment Logistics Planning Objective: Implement the infrastructure needed to bring PET-1 capabilities into general DoD use Deliverables Green: Generic Simulation Wrapping and convert to handle new LCOM version Green: Improved HPC back-end and response surface generation capability Green: Final Project Technical Report, 1 Oct 02 Yellow: Simplified User interface, 15 March 02 Yellow: Training Package – 15 April 02 Yellow: Demonstrate Mission Capable Rate Optimization– 31 May 02 Budget - $75,000 Period of Performance: 10/01 to 10/02 PI: Tilt Thompkins Yellow: Delayed for early focus on HPC back-end

12. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review12 IMT 006 Training and User-Focused Workshops Objective: develop and deliver a user- centric training and problem development program Deliverables Yellow: Develop base training materials Yellow: Deliver four four day workshops Yellow: Deliver four, two day, training classes Budget - $100,000 Period of Performance: 10/01 to 10/02 PI: Tilt Thompkins Developing requirements proved much more difficult than expected. Workshops now being scheduled for June and July

13. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review13 IMT Invoice Status CLIN 1CLIN 1 CUMCLIN 4CLIN 4 CUM JUN00 JUL00 AUG00 SEP00 OCT0000 NOV0000 DEC0000 JAN0000 FEB0000 MAR0000 APR$141,502 $50,966

14. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review14 IMT Budget March - 68% of Plan Forecast 90% of Plan

15. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review15 IMT Budget March - 61% of Plan Forecast 66% of Plan

16. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review16 Staffing 2 On-Sites, ARL and AEDC 1 New Hire for AEDC 1 departed due to performance issues, ARL AEDC Position required 5 months to fill, security clearance issues have delayed arrival at AEDC ARL position now open

17. 13-17 May 2002Contract Year 1 Review17 Summary University billing mistakes resolved and invoices should reflect close to estimated. On-Sites –Open slot at ARL –Security issues remain at AEDC