Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Christopher Doval, Esq. Don Anque, J.D. Maesea McCalpin B.A.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Christopher Doval, Esq. Don Anque, J.D. Maesea McCalpin B.A."— Presentation transcript:

1 Christopher Doval, Esq. Don Anque, J.D. Maesea McCalpin B.A.

2 Historically copyright law…  Responds to changes in  technology  Equitable compensation  Law Outpaced By Technology  Reform/Challenges  Divergent business interests Today…

3 Changing Technology  Revolutionized consumption of media  FM growing obsolete  Subscription Broadcast  Internet Radio Advent of…

4 Copyright Act of 1976  Two copyrights per song  Composition VS Recording  Four exclusive rights

5  Right to exclude public performances via digital audio transmission. Tiers based on: Mode of broadcast Mode of broadcast Business model Business model  Implemented tier system for royalty payments for royalty payments

6 Subscription Broadcast Interactive Service  Exempt  Compulsory Licensing Scheme  Direct Negotiations

7 Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 Added fourth tier  801b → Willing buyer willing seller  Allowed pre=existing companies to maintain original royalty rate Changed royalty rates  Webcasters

8 From the Law to the Law Suits…

9 A Bit of Controversy: The Inno  XM Radio + MP3 Player  One touch recording and purchase through napster purchase through napster  Marketed and designed to record up to 50 hours to record up to 50 hours of satellite radio of satellite radio

10 RIAA v XM RIAA claims: XM calls AHRA to its defense  Inno: Subscription transmission or interactive service?  Inno violates right to distribution? Cost of Settlements?

11 What does RIAA v XM mean for Copyright? Device has functions of Legislative barriers to device violate spirit of copyright Current law cannot encompass device’s functions  Two business models  Two technologies

12 The Inno and the DMCA Inno law suit demonstrates inadequacies of DMCA  Unable to accommodate new business models  Unable to anticipate innovation  Inability to overcome divergent interests  Disparities in royalty rates

13 “The Next Great Copyright Act” Register of Copyrights Maria Pallante calls for reform  Readability and Clarity  Full public performance right for sound recordings  Review of DMCA  Incidental Copies  Enforcement Strategies  Licensing and royalty disparities  Exceptions and Limitations  International Norms

14 Licensing and the Section 115 Reform Act Addressing the disparity in royalty obligations  IRFA Would have changed online radio services to 801b standard  Sec. 115 Reform Act Would have created a single royalty rate for use by digital audio recordings  801b versus Willing buyer willing seller Time to revisit these Acts?

15 Private Licensing Reform Potential solution for more effective licensing models? Lack of oversight Potential for abuse  Downsides?  Circumvents the statutory license  Allow companies to deal directly with copyright holders Ex. Apple/Warner Collaboration

16 Other VoicesOther Voices David O Carson  Argues inequity of current royalty rates under DMCA John Villasenor  Advocates review of DPRA & DMCA  Calls for full public performance right for recordings

17

18 Legislative action for overarching reform is overdue.


Download ppt "Christopher Doval, Esq. Don Anque, J.D. Maesea McCalpin B.A."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google