Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAmberly Patterson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Evidence Based Orthopaedics- The Best Practice Standards
Dr Hitesh Gopalan U Editor, Evidence Based Orthopaedic Principles Editor, Visiting Professor, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada Expert Advisor, OrthoEvidence SICOT India Scientific Chairman
2
Disclosures Nil
3
10 pathbreaking discoveries in last 500 years
4
Why EBM? One of the most highly searched medical word on Google
Change in existing Practice
5
Hierarchy of Evidence Randomized Trials Prospective Cohort Studies
Meta-analysis Randomized Trials Level 1 Prospective Cohort Studies Level 2 Level 3 Case Control Studies Retrospective Case Series Level 4 Opinion Level 5
6
Randomization Tx A Outcome R Patients Tx B Outcome Forward in Time
7
Randomized Trials Aren’t Always Practical or Feasible
Ethical Issues “Is it ethical to randomize patients” Outcomes are too rare? “We’ll never be able to recruit so many patients!” Surgeon “buy in” Differential expertise The Primary Question Prognosis Cost We’ll never raise enough money to pull this off
8
Hierarchy of Evidence Randomized Trials Prospective Cohort Studies
Level 1 Prospective Cohort Studies Level 2 Level 3 Case Control Studies Retrospective Case Series Level 4 Opinion Level 5
9
Cohort Study ? Forward in Time Exposed A Outcome Patients Exposed B
10
Hierarchy of Evidence Randomized Trials Prospective Cohort Studies
Level 1 Prospective Cohort Studies Level 2 Level 3 Case Control Studies Retrospective Case Series Level 4 Opinion Level 5
11
Case-Control Study Backward in Time Infection Prognostic Factor
Outcomes Infection Prognostic Factor Start Here No Infection Prognostic Factor Backward in Time
12
What is Evidence-based Medicine?
conscientious requires clinical expertise current best evidence implies hierarchy of evidence health care decisions patient values
13
Hierarchy of Evidence Randomized Trials Prospective Cohort Studies
Case Control Studies Retrospective Case Series Opinion
14
Hierarchy of Evidence Randomized Trials Prospective Cohort Studies
Meta-analysis Randomized Trials Less Bias Level 1 Prospective Cohort Studies Level 2 Level 3 Case Control Studies Retrospective Case Series Level 4 Opinion Level 5 More Bias
15
Average No of Publications
6400 Across 64 pubmed Index Orthopaedic Journals
16
Countless Articles and Books
Springer: 150 Orthopaedic books per year Thieme: another 50….
17
Big Data
18
Industry Funded Research
Drug trials
19
VTE Prophylaxis ACCP Vs AAOS Debates: last 10 years
LMWH, Dabigatran, Fondaparinux, Rivaroxaban, Apixaban Recent Addition: Aspirin + Mechanical Prophylaxis
20
Evidence Pyramid
21
AVN Femoral head
22
GRADE Recommendations
High = Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect Moderate = Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate
23
High = Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect
Moderate = Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate
24
GRADE Recommendations
Low = Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328:1490.
25
AVN Hip Low = Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate
26
Downgrade Serious (-1) or very serious (-2) limitation to study quality Important inconsistency (-1) Some(-1) or major (-2) uncertainty about directness Imprecise or sparse data (-1) High probability of reporting bias
27
Levels of Evidence-2003
30
EBM: Who Discovered? Gordon Guyatt David Sackett( )
31
Navigated TKR Vs Conventional
32
Navigation 1mm deviation from mechanical axis
Femoral and tibial component alignment as perfect as possible Cost Effectiveness??
33
Eminence Vs Evidence: Hi Flex
38% femoral component loosening Han HS, J Bone Joint Surg Br Nov;89(11):
35
Clavicle Trial Explosion in clavicle fracture ORIF
Extended indications
36
Thank You
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.