Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Supervisor Core Training: Managing for Results Original presentation was created for Version 1.0 by Daniel Webster, Barbara Needell, Wendy Piccus, Aron.

Published byJoan Cannon Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Supervisor Core Training: Managing for Results Original presentation was created for Version 1.0 by Daniel Webster, Barbara Needell, Wendy Piccus, Aron."— Presentation transcript:

1 Supervisor Core Training: Managing for Results Original presentation was created for Version 1.0 by Daniel Webster, Barbara Needell, Wendy Piccus, Aron Shlonsky, & Lynn Usher. Revised for Version 1.1 by Shared Vision Consultants and CalSWEC to include outcome updates and slides available from presentations posted on the CSSR website.

2 Background and Concepts for Outcomes in Child Welfare: Data Informed Practice -- What do I Care? Part 1:

3 The Current Placement System* (Highly Simplified) Child In Child Out A bunch of stuff happens *adapted from Lyle, G. L., & Barker, M.A. (1998) Patterns & Spells: New approaches to conceptualizing children’s out of home placement experiences. Chicago: American Evaluation Association Annual Conference

4 Data Skepticism

5 The California Child Welfare Outcomes & Accountability System Quarterly distribution of county specific outcome indicators data Peer Quality Case Review County Self Assessment County Self Improvement Plan Continuous monitoring of outcomes

6 Caseload Snapshots Versus Entry Cohorts Jan. 1, 2008 Jan. 1, 2009Jan. 1, 2007

7 The Cycle of Experiences in the Child Welfare System The Cycle of Experiences in the Child Welfare System Counterbalanced Indicators of SystemPerformance PermanencyThroughReunification, Adoption, or Guardianship ShorterLengths Of Stay Stability Of Care Rate of Referrals/ Substantiated Referrals Home-Based Services vs. Out-of-HomeCare Maintain Positive Attachments To Family, Friends, and Neighbors Use of Least Restrictive Form of Care Source: Usher, C.L., Wildfire, J.B., Gogan, H.C. & Brown, E.L. (2002). Measuring Outcomes in Child Welfare. Chapel Hill: Jordan Institute for Families, Reentry to Care

8 Using Outcome Data in Child Welfare Practice Part 2:

9 Federal Versus State-Enhanced Measures Is Performance getting better or worse? Adoption within 24 Months Data Source: Multi-State Data Archive, Chapin Hall Center for Children

10 20082009 Jan. 1 Mar. 1 Dec. 31 Jul. 7 Jan. 1Dec. 31 Tracking an Entry Cohort for 1 Year

11 Rolling Years: Quarter 1 Extract Jan. 1 20082009 Dec. 31 Mar. 31 Jan. 1Dec. 31Jan. 1 2007 Extract Cut-off No data after April 1 Last day of data prior to cut-off March 31, 2009 ENTRY COHORT Apr. 1 April 1, 2007 – March 31, 2008 Last date able to track entry for full 12 months prior to cut-off.

12 Rolling Years: Quarter 2 Extract Jan. 1 20082009 Dec. 31 Jun. 30 Jan. 1Dec. 31Jan. 1 2007 Extract Cut-off No data after July 1 Last day of data prior to cut-off June 30, 2009 ENTRY COHORT Jul. 1 July 1, 2007 -- June 30, 2008 Last date able to track entry for full 12 months prior to cut-off.

13 Child Welfare Dynamic Web Site

14 CWS Quarterly Outcomes Report

15 National Standards In California, the Center for Social Services Research attempts to replicate each of the measures and composite scores, break them out by child welfare and probation agencies, and report/update quarterly. The goal is to improve State performance on all measures (every improvement reflects a better outcome for children) Source: Center for Social Services Research, UC Berkeley http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare

16 Measure Contributions to Composites Reunification Within 12 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Reunification (Exit Cohort) Reentry Following Reunification (Exit Cohort) Reunification Within 12 Months (Entry Cohort) Note: Measures may not sum to exactly 100% due to rounding. Source: Center for Social Services Research, UC Berkeley http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare

17 Measure Contributions to Composites Adoption Within 24 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Adoption (Exit Cohort) Adoption Within 12 Months (17 Months In Care) Legally Free Within 6 Months (17 Months In Care) Adoption Within 12 Months (Legally Free) Note: Measures may not sum to exactly 100% due to rounding. Source: Center for Social Services Research, UC Berkeley http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare

18 Measure Contributions to Composites Exits to Permanency (24 Months In Care) Exits to Permanency (Legally Free At Exit) In Care 3 Years Or Longer (Emancipated/Age 18) Note: Measures may not sum to exactly 100% due to rounding. Source: Center for Social Services Research, UC Berkeley http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare

19 Measure Contributions to Composites Placement Stability (8 Days To 12 Months In Care) Placement Stability (12 To 24 Months In Care) Placement Stability (At Least 24 Months In Care) Note: Measures may not sum to exactly 100% due to rounding. Source: Center for Social Services Research, UC Berkeley http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare

20 Measure Contributions to Composites Note: Measures may not sum to exactly 100% due to rounding. Source: Center for Social Services Research, UC Berkeley http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare

21 Safety Indicator 1 S1.1 Indicator 2 S2.1 Permanency Composite 1: Reunification Composite 2: Adoption Composite 3: Long-Term Composite 4: Stability Component A Component B Component A Component B Component C Component A Component B Measure 1 Measure 2 Measure 3 Measure 4 Measure 1 Measure 2 Measure 3 Measure 4 Measure 5 Measure 1 Measure 2 Measure 3

22 Outcomes Based Management—a Hands-on Exercise Part 3: The following slides are provided courtesy of: Center for Social Services Research University of California, Berkeley http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare

23 California: Ethnicity and the Path through the Child Welfare System 2007 (Missing Values & Other Race Excluded from % Calculations,18 years of Age) Source: Center for Social Services Research, UC Berkeley http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare

24 July 1, 2008 California: Race/Ethnicity by Caseload Case Service % Components (Missing Values & Other Race Excluded from Calculations, Children of all Ages Included)

25 2007 California: Referrals per 1,000 by Age and Ethnicity *Series Total

26 2007 California: Substantiated Referrals per 1,000 by Age and Ethnicity *Series Total

27 2007 California: Entries to Foster Care per 1,000 by Age and Ethnicity *Series Total

28 2007 California: Children in Foster Care per 1,000 by Age and Ethnicity *Series Total

29 1998 to 2008 California: Foster Care Caseload by Placement Type Group/Shelter Kinship FFA Foster TOTAL Caseload 68,475 104,300

30 2002 to 2008 California: C3.1: Exits to Permanency (24m In Care), by Exit Type % Reunification % Guardianship % Adoption % Exits to Permanency TOTAL # in Care 24m+ 27,696 44,435

31 2002 to 2008 California: C3.3: In Care 3 Years Or Longer (Emancipated Or Age 18) National Goal (37.5%) % In Care 3+ Years goal # Emancipating or Age 18 in Care4,624 4,250

32 2002 to 2008 California: C4.1,2,3: Placement Stability 24+ Months In Care 12 to 24 Months In Care 8 Days to 12 Months in Care

33 2002 to 2008 California: Sibling Placements All Siblings Placed Together Some or All Siblings Placed Together

Download ppt "Supervisor Core Training: Managing for Results Original presentation was created for Version 1.0 by Daniel Webster, Barbara Needell, Wendy Piccus, Aron."

Similar presentations

Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.

Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,

Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
California Child Welfare Indicators Project Q4 2013 Slides Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California, Berkeley.

California Child Welfare Indicators Project Q Slides Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California, Berkeley.
Using Publicly Available Data to Engage IV-E Students in Research and Statistics: Instructional Modules MODULE 2 SLIDE DECK: LESSONS IN USING (AND MISUSING)

Using Publicly Available Data to Engage IV-E Students in Research and Statistics: Instructional Modules MODULE 2 SLIDE DECK: LESSONS IN USING (AND MISUSING)
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: 1. A Quick Tour of the Data 2. A Racial Equity Lens.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: 1. A Quick Tour of the Data 2. A Racial Equity Lens.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data 201: The Empirical Data Strikes Back* Emily Putnam-Hornstein, MSW Center.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data 201: The Empirical Data Strikes Back* Emily Putnam-Hornstein, MSW Center.
California’s Child Welfare Outcomes & Accountability System: Using Performance Measures to Encourage Improvement Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for.

California’s Child Welfare Outcomes & Accountability System: Using Performance Measures to Encourage Improvement Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
The C-CFSR or Some of My Best Friends are Outcome Measures National Resource Center for Child Welfare Data and Technology 8th National Child Welfare Data.

The C-CFSR or Some of My Best Friends are Outcome Measures National Resource Center for Child Welfare Data and Technology 8th National Child Welfare Data.
Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social.

Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Are Your Friends: California’s Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Are Your Friends: California’s Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
Building a Better Child Welfare System for Fresno's Children: Using Data as Our Foundation (and Friend!) Daniel Webster, MSW PhD Center for Social Services.

Building a Better Child Welfare System for Fresno's Children: Using Data as Our Foundation (and Friend!) Daniel Webster, MSW PhD Center for Social Services.
Reunification for Siblings in Out-of-Home Care Using a Statistical Technique for Examining Non-independent Observations Presented by: Joseph Magruder,

Reunification for Siblings in Out-of-Home Care Using a Statistical Technique for Examining Non-independent Observations Presented by: Joseph Magruder,
Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.

Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.
California Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability Legislation: Evolving Toward System Improvement with Longitudinal Data & Analysis Panel on Increasing.

California Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability Legislation: Evolving Toward System Improvement with Longitudinal Data & Analysis Panel on Increasing.
The California Child Welfare System: Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily Putnam Hornstein, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services.

The California Child Welfare System: Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily Putnam Hornstein, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services.
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews 2001 - 2004.

Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Making the Most of Your Composite Computational Spreadsheet: Tools from California.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Making the Most of Your Composite Computational Spreadsheet: Tools from California.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google