Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Electron Cloud Growth & Mitigation: In-Situ SEY Measurements Retarding Field Analyzer Studies W. Hartung, J. Calvey, C. Dennett, J. Makita, V. Omanovic.

Published byTeresa Dortha Powell Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Electron Cloud Growth & Mitigation: In-Situ SEY Measurements Retarding Field Analyzer Studies W. Hartung, J. Calvey, C. Dennett, J. Makita, V. Omanovic."— Presentation transcript:

1 Electron Cloud Growth & Mitigation: In-Situ SEY Measurements Retarding Field Analyzer Studies W. Hartung, J. Calvey, C. Dennett, J. Makita, V. Omanovic for the C ESR TA Collaboration C ESR TA Advisory Committee Meeting ● 11 September 2012

2 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting2 In-Situ Secondary Electron Yield Measurements W. Hartung, C. Dennett, V. Omanovic for the C ESR TA Collaboration

3 Secondary emission is important for models of electron cloud build-up Review: SEY Studies 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting3 SEY depends on energy and angle of incident electron Secondary electrons have a distribution in energy and angle Inc. energy = 300 eV Inc. angle = normal Inc. angle = normal

4 Secondary Electron Yield (SEY) Studies –Measure SEY of surfaces under realistic conditions –Measure effect of beam conditioning –Compare different materials and mitigation coatings SEY apparatus based on technology developed at SLAC for measurements in PEP-II SEY measurements being done at CERN and KEK also Review: SEY Studies 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting4

5 Unique aspects of C ESR TA SEY program –In-situ: see beam conditioning vs time, not just before and after; change samples rapidly –Observe deconditioning in a realistic environment –Compare effect of direct SR photons to scattered photons + electrons Collaborative aspects of C ESR TA SEY program –Samples and coatings from SLAC, CERN, KEK –Duplicate systems delivered to Fermilab for future studies in Main Injector –Funding in place for surface texturing R&D with PNNL Review: SEY Studies 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting5

6 In-Situ Measurements 11 September 2012 In-Situ SEY Station (ISSS) –Horizontal sample: direct photons in middle –45° sample: scattered photons and cloud electrons –SEY measurements while samples remain under vacuum –Typically measure SEY during weekly tunnel access SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting6

7 SEY Samples 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting7 20° 25° 30° TiN- coated Bare Al Use DC electron gun and picoammeter for indirect SEY measurement

8 In-Situ Apparatus 11 September 2012 Expose samples to beam environment Measure SEY e-Gun Sample Beam Pipe Sample e-Gun CESR Beam SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting8

9 In-Situ Apparatus 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting9

10 SEY Samples 11 September 2012 MaterialDatesComments TiNJan 2010- Aug 2010 Samples from SLAC AlAug 2010- Nov 2010 6061-T6 Amorphous CNov 2010- Jan 2011 Coating by CERN Diamond-like CSep 2011- Nov 2011 Coating by KEK TiNNov 2011- Mar 2012 Samples from SLAC CuMar 2012- Jul 2012 OFC 101 Stainless steelAug 2012-316-series SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting10

11 SEY Techniques 11 September 2012 MaterialDatesModifications TiNJan 2010- Aug 2010 Commission systems AlAug 2010- Nov 2010 Remove vacuum gauges Amorphous CNov 2010- Jan 2011 Mitigate leakage current and charging Diamond-like CSep 2011- Nov 2011 Improve spatial resolution Ensure exposure of samples to direct SR TiNNov 2011- Mar 2012 More resolution at low energy More height resolution and range CuMar 2012- Jul 2012 More angle resolution and range Stainless steelAug 2012-Reduce cross-talk, improve record-keeping SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting11

12 SEY vs Energy: Example 11 September 2012 Beam conditioning of horizontal TiN sample (2011-2012) SEY at center of sample: Inc. angle = 25° Note: 100 Amp·hr = 3·10 23 photons/meter SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting12

13 Peak SEY vs Beam Dose 11 September 2012 Horiz. 45° Beam conditioning of SEY samples (center, inc. angle = 25°) SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting13

14 SEY Findings 11 September 2012 Direct SR (horizontal sample) vs electrons and scattered photons (45° sample) –Did not observe clear difference with initial samples –Now observing some differences after improvements in techniques Preliminary Findings –Differences limited to early conditioning for stainless steel and copper –Differences endure longer for TiN SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting14

15 Example: SEY along beam pipe 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting15 Beam conditioning of stainless steel (at 405 eV) Horiz.45° Direct SR Inc. angle ≈ 25°

16 SEY Work in Progress 11 September 2012 SEY dependence on incident angle –More extensive measurements on recent samples –Need to compare with SEY models SEY at low incident energy –More extensive measurements on recent samples –Need to better quantify systematic errors Deconditioning –Observe SEY increase with samples in vacuum –Quantified effect for Cu samples during down –Observe SEY increase with exposure to air More systematic measurements needed SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting16

17 Connection to SEY Models 11 September 2012 SEY models for EC build-up –SEY depends on energy and angle of incident e - –“True” secondaries: low energy –“Elastic” secondaries: same energy as incident e - –“Rediffused” secondaries: energy ≤ incident e - Work in progress/future interests –What parameters of SEY models are constrained by the measurements? –How does the measured SEY differ from the actual SEY? –What can we learn about the energy distribution of secondaries? SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting17

18 Conclusion 11 September 2012 C ESR TA SEY studies –Measurements on samples of 6 materials/coatings so far –Improvements in techniques have been made –Measured rate of beam conditioning –Measured direct SR vs indirect conditioning –Connecting SEY measurements to SEY models: in progress –Ultimate goals: constrain SEY model parameters as much as possible; use results in EC models SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting18

19 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting19 Retarding Field Analyzer Studies J. Calvey, W. Hartung, J. Makita for the C ESR TA Collaboration

20 Retarding Field Analyzers (RFAs) –Measure flux of electrons from cloud –Average over many turns (basic version) –Modes of operation: Dedicated measurements with energy resolution Passive measurements without energy resolution Use of RFAs for electron cloud studies was pioneered at Argonne/APS C ESR TA RFA program collaborators: APS (K. Harkay et al.), LANL, SLAC, KEK, CERN Review: Retarding Field Analyzers 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting20

21 C ESR TA RFA program: unique features –RFA designs with transverse resolution –RFA designs for insertion in confined spaces –Many RFAs (~30) deployed in a single ring –RFAs in different environments: drift, dipole, quadrupole, wiggler –Dedicated RFA measurements Under different beam conditions In vacuum chambers with different mitigations Over time, to observe beam conditioning In combination with other EC diagnostics –Large data set already, ~4 years of measurements Review: Retarding Field Analyzers 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting21

22 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting22 Review: Retarding Field Analyzers e - cloud Beam pipe Grid (metal mesh) Collector(s) +100 V V grid Ideal RFA: measure electrons with energy > −V grid

23 C ESR TA thin segmented RFA design 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting23 Beam pipe Beam pipe holes Retarding grids Collectors

24 RFA Measurement Examples 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting24 RFA results for segmented collectors in different environments –Show distinctive “fingerprints” depending on local field (type of magnet and location of RFA) –Show good qualitative agreement with predictions of models for electron cloud build-up –Show good quantitative agreement with EC model predictions in drift regions

25 RFA Measurements: Drifts 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting25 –Broad distribution of electron flux –Peak flux generally aligned with transverse position of passing bunches –High flux of low- energy electrons –Some electrons with KE > 250 eV Collector current density vs transverse position vs retarding voltage (Cu chamber, I beam ~ 56 mA)

26 RFA Measurements: Dipoles 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting26 –Dipole field pins cloud electrons into trajectories that are vertically aligned with passing bunches –Segmented RFAs show sharper peak aligned with transverse position of beam Collector current density vs transverse position vs retarding voltage (Al chamber, I beam ~ 56 mA)

27 RFA Measurements: Dipoles 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting27 –Dipole RFA’s show “bifurcation” at high beam current –Cloud electrons receive bigger kicks from passing bunches as the beam current increases; impacting electron energies match peak in SEY curve (~300 eV) at larger transverse distances Collector current density vs transverse position vs beam current (Al chamber)

28 RFA Measurements: Quadrupoles 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting28 –Quadrupole field guides electrons along field lines –Segmented RFAs show sharp peak in a single collector with high electron flux –Electrons can remain trapped long after the bunch has passed Collector current density vs transverse position vs retarding voltage (I beam ~ 56 mA)

29 Mitigations 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting29 RFA provide quantitative measure of effects of surface coatings for mitigation of electron cloud Coated chambers –TiN –Amorphous C –Diamond-like C –NEG Uncoated Al chambers have much higher flux Drift RFA in 15E with different chambers

30 Mitigations: Findings 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting30 Drifts –Effective mitigation via coatings: TiN (SLAC), amorphous C (CERN), diamond-like C (KEK), or NEG (SAES) Dipoles and quadrupoles –Effective mitigation via coatings: TiN –Even more effective if grooves + coatings Wigglers –Most effective mitigation: clearing electrode

31 –RFA measurements provide data for validation of models for electron cloud build-up –Models require parameters describing surface phenomena: photon reflectivity, electron photo- emission, electron secondary emission –This is a major aspect of the C ESR TA RFA program. More info in Phase I Report and papers Quantitative Analysis of RFA Data 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting31

32 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting32 Model for SEY vs energy and angle of incident electron Inc. angle = normal δ ts δ red δ0δ0 E ts Quantitative Analysis of RFA Data Selected electron cloud model parameters QE = quantum efficiency (electron photo-emission)

33 Quantitative Analysis: Example 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting33 –Beam conditions used for one round of fitting –EC model parameters which are sensitive to conditions are shown

34 Quantitative Analysis: Example 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting34 Best fit parameters: TiN-coated chamber in 15W EC model parameters are adjusted for best fit to RFA measurements, using large data set with different beam conditions Uncertainty estimates do not take into account correlations within the model

35 Ideal RFAs would provide electron flux as a function of energy Real RFAs have complications –They drain electrons from beam environment –Secondaries are produced in beam pipe holes –When retarding voltage is close to electron energy, the electrons are focussed Work in progress –Modelling of electron transport into RFAs –Bench measurements with RFAs Goal: proper interpretation of RFA data Quantitative Analysis of RFA Data 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting35

36 RFA Bench Measurements: Example 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting36 Beam from DC electron gun (135 mm away): 200 eV, 100 nA RFA for bench measurements 3D RFA model

37 Conclusion 11 September 2012SEY/RFA--CesrTA Advisory Committee Meeting37 C ESR TA RFA program –Large-scale deployment of RFAs and extensive measurements –Providing quantitative information from different environments on the effect of mitigations for validation of electron cloud build up models –Ultimate goals: help in the development of electron cloud models with predictive capability

Download ppt "Electron Cloud Growth & Mitigation: In-Situ SEY Measurements Retarding Field Analyzer Studies W. Hartung, J. Calvey, C. Dennett, J. Makita, V. Omanovic."

Similar presentations

KEK Update on the status of the electron cloud studies at KEKB Contents Brief review of our studies Updates Clearing electrode Groove structure SEY measurement.

KEK Update on the status of the electron cloud studies at KEKB Contents Brief review of our studies Updates Clearing electrode Groove structure SEY measurement.
BUILD-UP SIMULATIONS FOR DAFNE WIGGLER W/ ELECTRODES Theo Demma.

BUILD-UP SIMULATIONS FOR DAFNE WIGGLER W/ ELECTRODES Theo Demma.
KEK Recent results of beam tests on clearing electrode and grooves 2010/1/191ILC DR WebEx Meeting Y. Suetsugu, KEK.

KEK Recent results of beam tests on clearing electrode and grooves 2010/1/191ILC DR WebEx Meeting Y. Suetsugu, KEK.
Review of Electron Cloud R&D at KEKB 1.Diagnostics 1.Beam Size Blow-up 2.Beam Instabilities 3.Electron Density 4.SEY (Secondary Electron Yield) 2.Mitigation.

Review of Electron Cloud R&D at KEKB 1.Diagnostics 1.Beam Size Blow-up 2.Beam Instabilities 3.Electron Density 4.SEY (Secondary Electron Yield) 2.Mitigation.
2006/09/25-28 ILCDR06, Cornell University 1 Experimental Study on Suppression of Electron Cloud Effect at the KEKB Positron Ring Contents Introduction.

2006/09/25-28 ILCDR06, Cornell University 1 Experimental Study on Suppression of Electron Cloud Effect at the KEKB Positron Ring Contents Introduction.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
In-Situ Secondary Electron Yield Measurements for C ESR TA: Update W. Hartung, C. Dennett, V. Omanovic, Y. Li, T. Moore for the C ESR TA Collaboration.

In-Situ Secondary Electron Yield Measurements for C ESR TA: Update W. Hartung, C. Dennett, V. Omanovic, Y. Li, T. Moore for the C ESR TA Collaboration.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.

ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.

LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Modeling Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Modeling Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory.
ElectronsdFud Simulation Work at Cornell Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.

ElectronsdFud Simulation Work at Cornell Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York First Results on the Introduction of the Rediffused SEY Component.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York First Results on the Introduction of the Rediffused SEY Component.
49th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop October 8 –12, 2010 LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with.

49th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop October 8 –12, 2010 LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with.
Electron Clouds at SLAC Johnny Ng ILC Damping Rings Collaboration Meeting March 4, 2009.

Electron Clouds at SLAC Johnny Ng ILC Damping Rings Collaboration Meeting March 4, 2009.
Electron Cloud Simulations Using ORBIT Code - Cold Proton Bunch model April 11, 2007 ECLOUD07 Yoichi Sato, Nishina Center, RIKEN 1 Y. Sato ECLOUD07.

Electron Cloud Simulations Using ORBIT Code - Cold Proton Bunch model April 11, 2007 ECLOUD07 Yoichi Sato, Nishina Center, RIKEN 1 Y. Sato ECLOUD07.
Webex Electron Cloud Evaluations for ILC DR Mauro Pivi on behalf of the ILC Electron Cloud Working Group - by Webex - KILC12 – Daegu Korea April 25, 2012.

Webex Electron Cloud Evaluations for ILC DR Mauro Pivi on behalf of the ILC Electron Cloud Working Group - by Webex - KILC12 – Daegu Korea April 25, 2012.
C ESR TA Mitigation Studies & Inputs for the ILC DR Design October 21, 2010 Mark Palmer for the C ESR TA Collaboration.

C ESR TA Mitigation Studies & Inputs for the ILC DR Design October 21, 2010 Mark Palmer for the C ESR TA Collaboration.
ILC damping ring Workshop, Dec 19, 2007, KEK, L. WANG Ecloud simulation 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 Lanfa Wang, SLAC.

ILC damping ring Workshop, Dec 19, 2007, KEK, L. WANG Ecloud simulation 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop December, 2007 Lanfa Wang, SLAC.
Preliminary Simulation on Electron Cloud Build-up in SppC Liu Yu Dong.

Preliminary Simulation on Electron Cloud Build-up in SppC Liu Yu Dong.
ILC08 Chicago 15-20 November 2008 Summary of Recent Results from SLAC M. Pivi, J. Ng, D. Arnett, G. Collet, T. Markiewicz, D. Kharakh, R. Kirby, F. Cooper,

ILC08 Chicago November 2008 Summary of Recent Results from SLAC M. Pivi, J. Ng, D. Arnett, G. Collet, T. Markiewicz, D. Kharakh, R. Kirby, F. Cooper,

Similar presentations

Ads by Google