1. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 20091 LHC enhanced Quench Protection System project Review committee meeting February 24 th –26 th 2009

2. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 20092 Presentation outline  Upgrade motivations  Main requirements for the project  Previous internal review of new electronics for QPS  Project organization  Project planning  Outsourcing  Project management: main follow up meetings  Quality assurance: main points  Conclusions

3. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 20093 Upgrade motivations  Top priorities before next machine startup improved coverage of quench detection due to: - Abnormal splice joint resistance (from Sept. 19 th 2008 task force incident analysis) - Heat, beam loss, …etc…, induced symmetric quench (decision at Chamonix meeting, Feb. 2 nd -6 th, to run from day 1 at high energy) improved fault reliability of 230V UPS system (decision at Chamonix meeting, Feb. 2 nd -6 th )  Optional need for later machine startup: capability to monitor magnet ground voltage variations (this case is not treated now)

4. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 20094 Main goals for the project 1.Avoid changing the present magnet quench protection system It is proven to perform as expected Avoid re-commissioning 2.Add more electronics and infrastructure for bus bar joints and symmetric quench protections: ~500 DQAMG type S controller boards ~2500 DQQBS bus detection boards ~2000 DQQDS symmetric quench detection boards ~450 DQLPUS power supply units ~450 Crates with backplanes ~4400 Cables to dipoles and quadrupoles, total length ~230 km ~1600 Interlock patch panel 3.Duplicate UPS power distribution system ~900 Power packs ~1600 Distribution patch panels (may be two different types) ~1600 New power cables to QPS racks ~1600 QPS racks to update cable layout ~80 Protection units for the insertion region magnets (triplets) Total ~5900 boards Another ~900 boards

5. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 20095 Internal review of new electronics for QPS Held on Jan. 13 th Mainly aimed at production readiness Report available on INDICO (http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?resId=0&materialId=minutes&confId=51077http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?resId=0&materialId=minutes&confId=51077 Note: it needs NICE login) Main recommendations concerned: – Management, planning and resources – Radiation Tolerance – Technical issues for electronics (EMC, cabling, power, electronics reliability, electronics implementation, documentation) – Production and its follow up – Quality assurance 22 recommendations in total that are being applied according to project progression => a meeting with referees will be organized for providing status <=

6. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 20096 Project breakdown structure has been defined (started beginning January) Project leader: Knud Dahlerup-Petersen Project technical coordinator: Fabio Formenti 17 upgrade Work Packages it reflects today’s understanding, however trend seems pointing to a growth e.g. protection of insertion regions, more routine activities, other new priorities (maybe this review recommendations?) 10 different responsibles of Work Packages Go to working document => Project organization

7. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 20097 Project planning (PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE!) Chosen MS Project as project management tool to implement resource planning (as part of QA) Detailed dates, milestones and resource assignment (ongoing process) -> The document is now being revised because of new defined priorities (symm. quench & UPS) Included: all upgrade WPs and most urgent M&O tasks impacting on resource sharing Timescale of QPS Electronics Upgrade Project: started Sept. 1 st 08 – ending milestone Aug. 31 st 09 Planning based on: 40h/w working time not included (yet?) other holidays than week-ends and official holidays contingency cannot simply apply -> rescheduling and adding resources Go to working document =>

8. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 20098 Outsourcing  Sharing of responsibilities: specifications, supervision, follow up and commissioning -> MPE group specific competences -> support from TE, BE, EN, PH and external institutes production -> industry  Detailed Work Package definition for activities to be outsourced is in final editing Outsourcing is the only flexibility for this project planning To be effective, large WPs should be released to well selected competent teams  Go to working document =>

9. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 20099 Project management: follow up meetings Observation: many meetings and discussions are organized… … but this also takes time to the ongoing activities => Carefully attendance to most relevant meetings and when agenda is highly pertaining <= Project status report meetings (Siemko) When:every Friday, since January 1 st Who: MPE management and engineering staff What:major technical issues, outsourcing coordination, planning & project management status Technical report meetings (Dahlerup Petersen) When:every Monday, since 13/02/09 Who:all MPE-CP section people and collaborators involved in the QPS project What:detailed technical issues, activity status, incoming week work planning, supplier follow up, component procurement, logistics Hardware commissioning meeting (Schmidt) Starting soon (March 19 th )

10. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200910 Project management: contribution to other meetings CCC machine re-commissioning meetings When:every Monday Who:management, project responsibles, coordinators What:activity status of magnet repair and new protection system (basically information meeting) Shut down planning meeting When:every Thursday Who:CERN activity responsibles, external work contractors What:global upgrade planning coordination … this is not surely fully exhaustive list …

11. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200911 Quality assurance  Not trying to compromise on this issue  Main points being implemented: 1.Maximum availability of technical documentation (drawings, procedures, testers, s/w, etc.) on public domain (e.g. EDMS, DFS/public) 2.Thorough prototype verification in house by designers 3.Radiation tests of all key electronics components 4.Careful industry selection to conform to international quality standards (ISO9000) 5.Maximum of system component traceability, use of manufacturing and installation databases 6.Rigorous pre-production qualification and production acceptance tests with standardized procedures 7.Full system pre-commissioning in QPS lab and test result database 8.Installation with trained operators and verification tests by different team 9.Final commissioning supervised by QPS team engineers

12. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200912 Conclusions  Bus bar quench detection  Symmetric quench detection (new priority)Motivate upgrade of QPS system  UPS improved redundancy (new priority) => Some new 6800 electronics cards to build and commission in tight time schedule <= => Some 1600 QPS racks to update <=  Work breakdown structure has been defined for all main upgrade activities => Routine activities, e.g. related to s34 reparation, compete for resource sharing <=  Schedule follow up and resource management have been introduced in planning tool => It is under revision for complying with new added priorities <=  Outsourcing becomes a necessity and is being implemented => We are editing tasks to define precise competences <=

13. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200913 Extras Example: cable installation test

14. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200914 1. HV test (500V)

15. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200915 The automated HV tester system Power taken from QPS crate or tunnel blue power boxes Safe ground connection

16. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200916 Analog cables (blue) and interlock cables (white) are only connected to the tester at its near end (the other end is left open)

17. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200917 Automatic testing (it takes about 8 minutes) Testing … … and storing test report Temperature and humidity shall be verified

18. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200918 2. Continuity test

19. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200919 Coming in front of QPS crate (below B dipole) Identification of right location in cable database Connecting tester to power (taken from QPS crate)

20. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200920 Connecting cables to tester Analog cables (blue) and interlock cables (white) have to be connected to good tester port following the database First check done with other cable side open (tester lights must be OFF)

21. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200921 Putting diode taps at other ends of cables HV check mark must already be present

22. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200922 The two cable ends could be up to a few 100 meters away

23. Fabio Formenti - Feb. 25th, 200923 Testing and labelling Tester lights ON if diode tap is connected to a good cable end Put barcode labels at two cable ends and annotate cable database