1. Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015

2. CEPEJ Study N22 is a comprehensive unique book, drawing a marvellous and concise picture of what CEPEJ is standing for today and where it came from. It consists of 6 chapters and 36 paragraphs. Chapter 1. The European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice is the consultative body of the Council of Europe, granted with the responsibility of developing and implementing guidelines and common standards in the sphere of the delivery of justice 1.1. Nature and organisational bases of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice 1.2. Functions of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015

3. The evaluation of the judiciary of the Member States is, beyond question, the main competence of the Commission, and rather the most visible to the outside world activity. Chapter 2. The evaluation of the court systems of the Member States of the Council of Europe is one of the main activities of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice 2.1. Evaluation tools of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice 2.1.1. CEPEJ Guidelines on judicial statistics (GOJUST) 2.1.2. Objectives and methodology for a pilot peer review co-operation process on judicial statistics 2.2. Main documents drafted by the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice in respect to all Member States of the Council of Europe: reports on the evaluation of European states judiciary 2.2.1. Experimental Report on European judiciary 2004 (according to the data of 2002) 2.2.2. Report on European judiciary 2006 (according to the data of 2004) 2.2.3. Report on European judiciary 2008 (according to the data of 2006) 2.2.4. Report on European judiciary 2010 (according to the data of 2008) 2.2.5. Report on European judiciary 2012 (according to the data of 2010) and Report on European judiciary 2014 (according to the data of 2012) Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015

4. The European Court of Human Rights practice indicates that the length of proceedings is one of the main problems in the delivery of justice in the Member States. Consequently, the creation of a special Centre by the CEPEJ in 2007, whose activity consists purely in working on issues on trial duration, was quite predictable. Chapter 3. The activity of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice relating to the management of judicial time in the European court systems 3.1. Time management checklist: study and analysis of judicial time use research network working document 3.2. Framework-Programme “A new objective for judiciary: the processing of each case within an optimum and foreseeable timeframe” 3.3. Compendium of ‘best practices’ on time management of judicial proceedings 3.4. Revised SATURN Guidelines for judicial time management 3.5. Report on the Implementation of SATURN time management tools Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015

5. The CEPEJ activity is also aimed at the development of various analytical tools used for enhancing the quality of justice in the Member States. Chapter 4. The activity of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice aimed at improving the quality of the European court systems 4.1. Checklist for promoting the quality of justice and the courts 4.2. Checklist for court coaching in the framework of customer satisfaction surveys among court users 4.3. Report on the conducting of satisfaction surveys amongst court-users in the Member States of the Council of Europe 4.4. Court-user satisfaction reports prepared by the national courts of the Member States 4.5. Guidelines on the creation of judicial maps to support access to justice within a quality judicial system 4.6. Questionnaire for collecting information on the organization and accessibility of court premises 4.7. Guidelines on the organization and accessibility of court premises 4.8. Questionnaire on the role of experts in the judicial systems of the Council of Europe Member States 4.9. Guidelines on the role of court-appointed experts in judicial proceedings Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015

6. Chapter 5. The activity of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice in terms of the implementation of alternative methods of resolving disputes, and the difficulties in the enforcement of court decisions 5.1. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice activity in relation to mediation 5.1.1. Analysis of the assessment of the impact of Council of Europe Recommendations on mediation 5.1.2. Guidelines on the implementation of the Council of Europe Recommendations on mediation 5.2. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice activity in relation to enforcement of judgments 5.2.1. Enforcement of court decisions in Europe 5.2.2. Guidelines for a better implementation of the existing Council of Europe's Recommendation on enforcement Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015 Within the activity of CEPEJ significant work has been done relating to the different aspects of implementing the alternative methods of resolving disputes, and the enforcement of court decision in Member States.

7. Chapter 6. Co-operation activities of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice with Member States (Albania, Azerbaijan, Croatia, Moldova, Turkey, Ukraine, Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia) 6.1. Joint Programme on enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine) as example 6.1.1. Report on efficient judiciary 6.6.2. Report on the profession of lawyer 6.6.3. Report on judicial training 6.2. Targeted co-operation process with Member States (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Croatia, France, Slovenia, Malta, Montenegro, Netherlands, Portugal, Russian Federation, Switzerland and United Kingdom) Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015 By implementing various joint programmes on enhancing judicial reforms and targeted co- operation process the CEPEJ goes even beyond the European continent.

8. 1.All documents regulating the activity of CEPEJ were given: Resolution on establishment Statute of the Commission Rules of procedure Objectives and methodology for a pilot peer review cooperation process on judicial statistics Note on possible integration of the Lisbon Network within the CEPEJ's activity programme Main elements for the functioning of the Network of Pilot Courts 2.Terms of reference and composition of each working group of the CEPEJ 3.List of experts and members representing Member States in the Commission 4.24 plenary meetings in brief (extracts from decisions reflected in the abridged reports adopted during the 12 years) 5.List of all awards of Crystal Scales of Justice Prize (2005-2014) 6.The structure of the CEPEJ Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015 Attachments

9. Thank you for attention! Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) and Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015