Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClarence Reeves Modified over 9 years ago
1
Singapore’s Advance GDP Estimates International Seminar on Timeliness, Methodology & Comparability of Rapid Estimates of Economic Trends 28 May 2009
2
2 Outline Compilation of Output-based Quarterly GDP Estimates Timeliness Methodology Assessing the Quality of Advance GDP Estimates Methodology Dataset Results Conclusion
3
Compilation of Quarterly Output-based GDP Estimates
4
4 Compilation Cycle Incomplete and limited data Detailed disaggregation may not be possible More disaggregation possible. Quarterly and earlier annual estimates revised Estimates reconciled and benchmarked with I-O tables Advance Qtrly Estimates Prelim Qtrly Estimates Annual Estimates Periodic Rebasing
5
5 Jan FebApr May Mar Compilation cycle for 1Q GDP estimates Advance Released not later than 2 weeks after end of reference qtr Preliminary Released 8 weeks after end of reference qtr Example: Advance 1Q09 is released on 14 Apr 09 Preliminary 1Q09 is released on 21 May 09 Timeliness
6
6 Industry Breakdown Advance GDP ReleasePreliminary GDP Release TimelinessNot later than 2 weeks after end of reference quarter Not later than 8 weeks after end of reference quarter Industry Breakdown Overall GDP Manufacturing Construction Services Producing Industries Overall GDP Goods Producing Industries Manufacturing Construction Utilities Other Goods Industries Services Producing Industries Wholesale & Retail Transport & Storage Hotels & Restaurants Information & Communications Financial Services Business Services Other Services Industries Ownership of Dwellings
7
7 Use of Indicators for GDP Compilation Base year (reconciled) nominal VA estimates Constant Price GDP Current Price GDP Price Indicators Volume IndicatorsValue Indicators
8
8 Methodology Indicators usedExamples Deflated turnoverTurnover estimates from monthly or quarterly industry surveys (e.g. catering trade, retail trade) Deflated current price indicators Progress payments for the construction industry Volume indicatorsContainer throughput, visitor arrivals, mobile call minutes Input indicatorsEmployment, wages
9
9 Methodology Tools for compiling the Advance GDP estimates Forecasting ARIMA forecasts generated by X12-ARIMA software (developed by US Census Bureau) Excel Interface Allows quick and easy forecasting Multiple series can be forecasted simultaneously Inputs from data providers/major industry players Professional judgement
10
10 Advance Estimates for Manufacturing Forecasting Inputs from data providers Professional judgement 2 months of the Index of Industrial Production Methodology How the Advance Estimates for Manufacturing are compiled
11
Assessing the Quality of Advance GDP Estimates
12
12 Methodology To assess the quality of Advance GDP Estimates using revision analysis Examine: 1)Whether Advance GDP is a biased estimate of the Prelim GDP 2)Whether information are efficiently used in the Advance GDP Revision refers to Prelim GDP – Advance GDP, i.e. later estimate minus earlier estimate
13
13 1)To examine whether Advance GDP under- or over-estimate Prelim GDP a)Mean Revisions and its statistical significance (using HAC-variance-based t- test at 5 % level): where significant mean revisions imply possible under- or over- estimation in Advance GDP Follows the approach described in Di Fonzo (2005) Methodology
14
14 Methodology 2)To examine whether information are efficiently used in the estimation of Advance GDP a.Correlation between revisions and earlier estimate, and its statistical significance: where significant correlation indicates that information are not efficiently utilized in earlier estimate, i.e. part or all of the revisions are corrections to earlier estimates, i.e. revisions reflect ‘noise’
15
15 b.Correlation between revisions and later estimate, and its statistical significance: where significant correlation indicates that part or all of the revisions reflect new information i.e. revisions reflect ‘news’ Follows the approach described in Mckenzie, Tosetto and Fixler Methodology
16
16 Published 2002 Q4 – 2008 Q4 year-on-year growths of the GDP Advance Estimates (E) and the GDP Prelim Estimates (L): Total GDP Manufacturing Services Producing Industries Dataset
17
17 Revisions to Total GDP Growth
18
18 Sample Size25 Mean Revisions0.3% Mean Rev is not significant at 5% level HAC-based p-value0.07 Corr( Rev,Advance)0.3 No evidence of noise Clear evidence that revisions are due to news P-value0.15 Corr( Rev,Prelim)0.45 P-value0.02 Revisions to Total GDP Growth
19
19 Revisions to Manufacturing Growth
20
20 Sample Size25 Mean Revisions0.7% Mean Rev is not significant at 5% level HAC-based p-value0.15 Corr( Rev,Advance)0.22 No evidence of noise Strong evidence that revisions are due to news P-value0.28 Corr( Rev,Prelim)0.44 P-value0.03 Revisions to Manufacturing Growth
21
21 Revisions to Services Growth
22
22 Sample Size25 Mean Revisions0.2% Mean Rev is not significant at 5% level HAC-based p-value0.36 Corr( Rev,Advance)0.20 No evidence of noise Clear evidence that revisions are due to news P-value0.35 Corr( Rev,Prelim)0.41 P-value0.04 Revisions to Services Growth
23
23 Conclusion Advance GDP estimates are good early indicators of the aggregate economic activity Advance GDP estimates are generally unbiased Information is efficiently used in Advance GDP estimates. Revisions to Advance GDP reflect new information not available at the time.
24
24 References Di Fonzo, T. (2005), The OECD project on revisions analysis: First elements for discussion, paper presented at the OECD STESEG Meeting, Paris, 27-28 June 2005 http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/55/17/35010765.pd f Mckenzie, Tosetto and Fixler Assessing the efficiency of early estimates of economic statistics, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/20/13/41009155.pd f http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/20/13/41009155.pd f
25
Thank you
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.