Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJoshua Cole Modified over 9 years ago
1
Global South 2007-8 Lecture 7: November 9, 2007 Corporate Power and the Developmental State
2
Large Corporations What specific qualities of large corporations produce wealth? Economies of scale Recruiting and development of human capital Networking Research and development
3
But the key is… Complementarity between ‘physical’ and ‘human’ capital Between ‘tangible’ and ‘intangible’ capital This is what brings about increasing returns to scale Google’s growth http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/0 61026-091240 http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/0 61026-091240 http://investor.google.com/fin_data.html http://investor.google.com/fin_data.html
4
Growth of Facebook FB Year 1 (Dec. 31, 2004) — 1 million FB Year 2 (Dec. 31, 2005) — 5 million FB Year 3 (Dec. 31, 2006) — 12 million FB Year 4 (Apr. 26, 2007) — 20 million FB Year 4 (Aug. 1, 2007) — 30 million
5
What does this lead to? Monopolies and oligopolies GM versus Toyota http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/h i/guides/457000/457029/html/default.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/h i/guides/457000/457029/html/default.stm
6
The big assumption here is… Corporate profitability = national economic growth (and implicitly equal to development)
7
The South Korean chaebol http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/chaeb ol.htm#SAMSUNG Samsung ($89.1 billion), Samsung Hyundai Motor Company ($57.2 billion), Hyundai Motor Company LG ($50.4 billion), LG SK ($46.4 billion), SK Hanjin ($16.2 billion), Hanjin Hyundai Heavy Industries ($10.5 billion Hyundai Heavy Industries
9
How did this happen in Korea? Two views: “Free market” State intervention
10
What did the Korean state do? “get prices wrong” Reciprocity Cheap loans Quotas Rewards and punishments
11
Key features of Korean capitalist development Sever the link between colonial and ‘national’ capital (recall Cardoso and Faletto) Focus on growth and not profitability Highly extractive (rise in incomes but low on political rights, leading to the labour movement
12
YearIndex of Industrial Production (1936=100) Index of Profitability (1936=100) 1939-40114590 1940-41117617 1941-42123896 1942-43109926 1943-441081044 Prices And Profits In India, 1940-44
13
1969-751976-791981-84 Total Manufacturing Avg4.074.381.94 Large Manufacturing Avg3.994.241.67 Small Manufacturing Avg6.185.173.49 Export Industries Avg4.992.002.43 Domestic Industries Avg5.465.581.62 Profitability of Korean Industry: 1969-1984
14
Developmental state A developmental state on the other hand actively shapes society, social relations and social goals. What distinguishes it from a predatory state? Simply put, a developmental state develops society; a predatory state extracts from society
15
Who gains? In a developmental state? In a predatory state?
16
The context of emergence of developmental state Autonomy Coordination Authoritarian political structure Weak social formations
17
Condition for its success? Alliance with elite interests? Authoritarianism? What happens to it after “classes” develop and “elite interests” consolidate?
18
Nature of autonomy Embedded – what exactly does this mean
19
India Growth but not ‘development’ What does the author mean? Did East Asia see development? Main argument
20
Historical structures (Cox) Social forces Land relations? Industrial capitalism? Forms of state Democracy/dictatorship “developmentalism” World Orders Hegemonic/non-hegemonic
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.