Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

COMPARISON OF PARAMETER ESTIMATION BETWEEN ET-B AND ET-C SENSITIVITIES Tjonnie Li (Nikhef) 2 September 2010 0 ET F2F, Nice.

Published byLee Griffith Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "COMPARISON OF PARAMETER ESTIMATION BETWEEN ET-B AND ET-C SENSITIVITIES Tjonnie Li (Nikhef) 2 September 2010 0 ET F2F, Nice."— Presentation transcript:

1 COMPARISON OF PARAMETER ESTIMATION BETWEEN ET-B AND ET-C SENSITIVITIES Tjonnie Li (Nikhef) 2 September 2010 0 ET F2F, Nice

2 Topics  Infer characteristics of the universe  Measured parameters  Test GR through its phase evolution  Measured parameters CosmologyTesting General Relativity Compare parameter estimation for different Einstein Telescope design studies 1 2 September 2010 ET F2F, Nice Outline

3 Design Sensitivities  ET-B  Single 3rd generation broadband detector  ET-C: Xylophone  2 band interferometer  high-power, high- frequency  cryogenic low-power, low-frequency 2 September 2010 2 ET F2F, Nice Outline

4 Infer characteristics of the universe by observing coalescing binary neutron stars Cosmography 2 September 2010 3 ET F2F, Nice

5 Cosmology  Infer characteristics of the universe  GW signal carries information about content of the universe between source and observer  Information encoded in the luminosity distance  Measure set of parameters  densities  dark energy equation of state 2 September 2010 4 ET F2F, Nice Cosmology

6 Measure cosmological parameters  Put sources across universe  Measure luminosity distance  Infer cosmological parameters 2 September 2010 5 ET F2F, Nice Cosmology

7 Trade Study  Ratio of root mean square errors (ET-C/ET-B)  Lower cut-off frequency 10Hz 2 September 2010 6 ET F2F, Nice Cosmology

8 Discussion  Advantage of ET-C comes in at lower frequencies  At 10Hz, higher SNR for ET-B due to better sensitivity for >30Hz  Need to go below 10Hz to gain full potential of ET-C 2 September 2010 7 ET F2F, Nice Cosmology

9 Conclusions  Parameter estimation lower cut-off frequency  10Hz not sufficient to probe full extend of ET-C  Only if f low ~ 5Hz, will ET-C be beneficial for parameter estimation 10Hz 5Hz 1Hz 2 September 2010 8 ET F2F, Nice Cosmology

10 Checking consistency between post-Newtonian phase coefficients Testing General Relativity 2 September 2010 9 ET F2F, Nice

11 Post Newtonian Formalism  General form of waveforms in Post-Newtonian (PN) formalism  Both amplitude and phase expanded in v/c  Phase evolution represented as  Similar in frequency domain (e.g. SPA) 2 September 2010 10 ET F2F, Nice Testing General Relativity

12 Testing General Relativity: Concept Arun et al. 2006  Measure independently  Check for consistency between PN phase coefficients  In GR, only two phase coefficients independent  Assume spinless systems 2 September 2010 11 ET F2F, Nice Mishra et al arXiv:1005.0304 Testing General Relativity

13 Frequency Domain Coefficients  Proposed test explored in frequency domain  Using SPA waveforms  ETB shown  Shows validity of scheme  Errors for ψ 3 ~0.01%  Greater errors for ψ k, k>3 (1%-100%) Mishra et al arXiv:1005.0304 2 September 2010 12 ET F2F, Nice Testing General Relativity

14 Time Domain Coefficients  Similar can be done for time domain phase coefficients  instead of  Time domain parameterisation shows better perfomance  ~50x better relative sensitivity  Yet to understand in full detail 2 September 2010 13 ET F2F, Nice Testing General Relativity

15 Trade Study 2 September 2010 14 ET F2F, Nice Testing General Relativity

16 Discussion  ET-C performs better than ET-B in the high mass region  Flso decreases with mass  Difference as large as 40%  Transition around 70-90 Msun Best performance depends on the sources of interest 2 September 2010 15 ET F2F, Nice Testing General Relativity ET-C better ET-B better

17 Discussion 2 2 September 2010 ET F2F, Nice 16 Testing General Relativity Improvement of several percent

18 Discussion 3 2 September 2010 ET F2F, Nice 17 Testing General Relativity F lso (100Msun) Increase mass Decrease Advantage ETB Decrease mass Increase Advantage ETB F low

19 Concluding Remarks 2 September 2010 ET F2F, Nice 18  Cosmology doesn’t benefit from ET-C if lower cut- off is set to 10Hz  Testing General Relativity only benefits at high total mass systems  All can be attributed to sensitivity loss between 30Hz-500Hz Full benefits of ET-C are only used if the lower cut-off frequency can be pushed down to below 10Hz Summary

20 If the talk did not provide sufficient detail Backup Slides 2 September 2010 19 ET F2F, Nice

Download ppt "COMPARISON OF PARAMETER ESTIMATION BETWEEN ET-B AND ET-C SENSITIVITIES Tjonnie Li (Nikhef) 2 September 2010 0 ET F2F, Nice."

Similar presentations

Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO On behalf of the Einstein Telescope Design Study Team 1GWDAW-Rome 2010.

Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO On behalf of the Einstein Telescope Design Study Team 1GWDAW-Rome 2010.
S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.

S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.

A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
Albert-Einstein-Institute Hannover ET filter cavities for third generation detectors ET filter cavities for third generation detectors Keiko Kokeyama Andre.

Albert-Einstein-Institute Hannover ET filter cavities for third generation detectors ET filter cavities for third generation detectors Keiko Kokeyama Andre.
LIGO-G080190-00-Z Beating the spin-down limit on gravitational wave emission from the Crab pulsar Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LIGO.

LIGO-G Z Beating the spin-down limit on gravitational wave emission from the Crab pulsar Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LIGO.
Upper-limit on Sco X-1 S2 preliminary results C Messenger, V Re and A Vecchio on behalf of PULG LSC General Meeting LHO, 10 th – 13 th November 2003.

Upper-limit on Sco X-1 S2 preliminary results C Messenger, V Re and A Vecchio on behalf of PULG LSC General Meeting LHO, 10 th – 13 th November 2003.
The evolution and collapse of BH forming stars Chris Fryer (LANL/UA)  Formation scenarios – If we form them, they will form BHs.  Stellar evolution:

The evolution and collapse of BH forming stars Chris Fryer (LANL/UA)  Formation scenarios – If we form them, they will form BHs.  Stellar evolution:
GWDAW9 - 2004/12/16 - G040548-00-Z1 Report on the First Search for BBH Inspiral Signals on the S2 LIGO Data Eirini Messaritaki University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

GWDAW /12/16 - G Z1 Report on the First Search for BBH Inspiral Signals on the S2 LIGO Data Eirini Messaritaki University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
GEO02 February 20-22 - 1 GEO Binary Inspiral Search Analysis.

GEO02 February GEO Binary Inspiral Search Analysis.
Parameter Estimation Using 3.5 post-Newtonian Inspiral Waveforms GWDAW, December 15-18, 2004, Annecy K. Arun, B.R. Iyer, B.S. Sathyaprakash and P. Sundarajan.

Parameter Estimation Using 3.5 post-Newtonian Inspiral Waveforms GWDAW, December 15-18, 2004, Annecy K. Arun, B.R. Iyer, B.S. Sathyaprakash and P. Sundarajan.
(SPH) Simulations of Binary Neutron Star Coalescence Examining the Mass Ratio Dependence of Post-Newtonian Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Jonathon Meyers,

(SPH) Simulations of Binary Neutron Star Coalescence Examining the Mass Ratio Dependence of Post-Newtonian Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Jonathon Meyers,
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis

Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
The “probability event horizon” and probing the astrophysical GW background School of Physics University of Western Australia Research is funded by the.

The “probability event horizon” and probing the astrophysical GW background School of Physics University of Western Australia Research is funded by the.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.

1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
Testing GR with Inspirals B.S. Sathyaprakash, Cardiff University, UK based on work with Arun, Iyer, Qusailah, Jones, Turner, Broeck, Sengupta.

Testing GR with Inspirals B.S. Sathyaprakash, Cardiff University, UK based on work with Arun, Iyer, Qusailah, Jones, Turner, Broeck, Sengupta.
1 Martin L. Perl SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Holger Mueller Physics Department, University California-Berkeley Talk.

1 Martin L. Perl SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Holger Mueller Physics Department, University California-Berkeley Talk.
Searching for gravitational radiation from Scorpius X-1: Limits from the second LIGO science run Alberto Vecchio on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

Searching for gravitational radiation from Scorpius X-1: Limits from the second LIGO science run Alberto Vecchio on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Mock Data Production, Characteristics, and Confusion Background WG4 f2f – Nice 09/01/10 Tania Regimbau.

Mock Data Production, Characteristics, and Confusion Background WG4 f2f – Nice 09/01/10 Tania Regimbau.
Adapting matched filtering searches for compact binary inspirals in LSC detector data. Chad Hanna – For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

Adapting matched filtering searches for compact binary inspirals in LSC detector data. Chad Hanna – For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Detection rates for a new waveform background design adopted from The Persistence of Memory, Salvador Dali, 1931 Bence Kocsis, Merse E. Gáspár (Eötvös.

Detection rates for a new waveform background design adopted from The Persistence of Memory, Salvador Dali, 1931 Bence Kocsis, Merse E. Gáspár (Eötvös.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google