1. Bartosz Sakowicz Marek Kaminski Piotr Mazur Calibration Database

2. 2 2009.06.26 XFEL Collaboration meeting, Lodz, Poland Bartosz Sakowicz, Ph.D., Dep. of Microelectronics and Computer Science, Tech. Univ. of Lodz Status of work from previous contract WP2.3.10.1Flash firmware databaseUnder review/accepted WP6.5.1.1EA RequirementsUnder review/accepted WP6.5.1.2 Active WP6.5.1.3 Active WP6.5.1.4 Active WP6.5.1.5 Under review/accepted WP6.5.2.1 Cancelled WP6.5.2.2 Cancelled WP6.5.3.1Main database modulesUnder review/accepted WP6.5.3.2 Under review/accepted WP6.5.3.3 Under review/accepted WP6.5.3.4 Under review/accepted WP6.5.3.5 Under review/accepted WP6.5.3.6 Under review/accepted WP6.5.3.7 Under review/accepted WP6.5.3.8 Under review/accepted WP6.5.4.1 Cancelled WP6.5.4.2 Cancelled WP6.5.4.3 Cancelled WP6.5.5.1EA configuration changeAccepted WP6.5.6.1Time Sheet SystemUnder review/accepted

3. Calibration Database 3 2009.06.26 XFEL Collaboration meeting, Lodz, Poland Bartosz Sakowicz, Ph.D., Dep. of Microelectronics and Computer Science, Tech. Univ. of Lodz Proposition to new contract (1) Calibration parameters prototype database (already done !)  hardware database (including cables and connections)  firmware database  calibration parameters database

4. Calibration Database 4 2009.06.26 XFEL Collaboration meeting, Lodz, Poland Bartosz Sakowicz, Ph.D., Dep. of Microelectronics and Computer Science, Tech. Univ. of Lodz Proposition to new contract (2) Calibration parameters database improvements (to be precised):  relation to DOOCS parameters  documentation database  software bundles concept  geographical localization feature  relation to Time Sheet System (in the future)

5. Calibration Database 5 2009.06.26 XFEL Collaboration meeting, Lodz, Poland Bartosz Sakowicz, Ph.D., Dep. of Microelectronics and Computer Science, Tech. Univ. of Lodz Relation to XFEL requirements/goals (1) [LLRF GOALS] ID NameText G1Minimal SystemBuild minimal system capable of fulfilling commissioning and initial operation (build minimal system that is capable of being upgraded to full automated system without major changes in the system structure) a. Scalable b. Upgradable c. Release capable (designed for multiple releases) G4Easy operationSupport the operators for easy operation, allow single operator to change beam energy G4.1Accept declarative inputsSystem should accept declarative inputs: a. Parameter will be set by operator and system determines settings for the inputs itself G4.2Operator input fault tolerance Prevent operator from setting parameters which lead to undesired accelerator conditions

6. Calibration Database 6 2009.06.26 XFEL Collaboration meeting, Lodz, Poland Bartosz Sakowicz, Ph.D., Dep. of Microelectronics and Computer Science, Tech. Univ. of Lodz Relation to XFEL requirements/goals (2) [USER REQUIREMENTS] ID NameText UR6Provide automation for operation Provide a high degree of automation of operation to assist the operator and system experts UR6.1Minimize the parameter set that the user should input Most of the LLRF system parameters should be generated automatically from the abstract input from the user. UR27User's manualProvide user's manual for LLRF operation UR32User interfaceProvide intuitive user interface with help function

7. Calibration Database 7 2009.06.26 XFEL Collaboration meeting, Lodz, Poland Bartosz Sakowicz, Ph.D., Dep. of Microelectronics and Computer Science, Tech. Univ. of Lodz Relation to XFEL requirements/goals (3) [SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS] IDNameText SR7Automation for operationProvide a high degree of automation of operation to assist the operators and RF experts: 1.All LLRF components should provide interfaces for automatic configuration and control 2.An unified and extendable automation concept and framework should be worked out 3.Procedures for different LLRF operation scenarios should be worked out 4.Automation bypass mode (manual mode of operation) should be also provided SR14.4.4Control system statusWarnings and alarms: 1.LLRF database accessibility 2.Operator input out of range Exceptions: 1.Operating system failure 2.Device driver failure 3.DOOCS server failure 4.Computer network failure SR16DocumentationProvide documentation for LLRF system description and operation support. The documentation should include system requirements, system concept, design, acceptance test descriptions and operational manuals. SR16.2Provide online help documentations Provide online help documentations for trouble shooting by the users. Each topic of the online help documentations should be able to be searched out within 1 minute. SR39(To be elaborated) Easy to install and re-install LLRF hardware and software should be easily installed. The metric can be: the man- hour needed to install a hardware or software. May include: 1.Cable installation 2.Crate and board installation 3.Software including the run-time environment installation 4.Firmware configuration SR49Easy to learnMore than 90% of the tasks should be done by the operator by accessing the online help documentations [SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS]

8. Calibration Database 8 2009.06.26 XFEL Collaboration meeting, Lodz, Poland Bartosz Sakowicz, Ph.D., Dep. of Microelectronics and Computer Science, Tech. Univ. of Lodz Thank you for attention