1. 2013 Loveland Agri Products Trial Data Narromine Gregory Wheat Foliar Trial

2. Trial Setup All treatments had LI700 @ 0.3% Location: “BUDDAH” Narromine central NSW Co-operators: Loveland Plot Size: 10m X 1.76m Replicates: 4 Sowing date: 7th May Sowing rate: 50 kg/ha Soil Moisture & Type:dry Clay loam 6.5 ph, 19.45 C (soil temp) General Comments: Sakura 118gm/ha (100lt/ha application rate) IBS using primary sales tynes, 4.5km/h 41% RH 22 deg C NE breeze. Sprayed 11am sowing commenced 11.30am. CV: Gregory Treatments applied 15 th June Z 15-22, August 2 nd Z 30

3. Trial Protocol TreatmentRate/haTiming SFP + NutriSync M (2 apps)365 ml Z15-22 + Z30 SFP + Awaken ST + NutriSync M (2 apps)3.75 L/T + 365 ml ST + Z15-22 + Z30 SFP + NutriSync M365 ml Z15-22 SFP + Awaken ST + NutriSync M3.75 L/T + 365 ml ST + Z15-22 SFP + NutriSync M (2 apps) + Urea365 ml + 100kg Z15-22 + Z30 SFP + Awaken ST + NutriSync M (2 apps) + Urea3.75 L/T + 365 ml + 100kg ST + Z15-22 + Z30 SFP + NutriSync M + Urea365 ml + 100kg Z15-22 + Z 30 SFP + Awaken ST + NutriSync M + Urea3.75 L/T + 365 ml + 100kg ST + Z15-22 + Z 30 SFP = Map @ 80kg/ha

4. Yield T/ha LSD (P=.05) =.350 CV = 7.85 TreatmentRate/haYield T/haProtein % SFP + NutriSync M (2 apps)365 ml 2.887.8 SFP + Awaken ST + NutriSync M (2 apps)3.75 L/T + 365 ml 3.147.8 SFP + NutriSync M365 ml 2.868.5 SFP + Awaken ST + NutriSync M3.75 L/T + 365 ml 2.928.3 SFP + NutriSync M (2 apps) + Urea365 ml + 100kg 3.179.4 SFP + Awaken ST + NutriSync M (2 apps) + Urea 3.75 L/T + 365 ml + 100kg 3.019.4 SFP + NutriSync M + Urea365 ml + 100kg 3.088.9 SFP + Awaken ST + NutriSync M + Urea3.75 L/T + 365 ml + 100kg 3.159.2

5. Yield T/ha LSD (P=.05) =.350 CV = 7.85

6. mm 2012 Total = 420 mm 2013 Total = 455 mm Narromine Rainfall

7. Trial established as a network request to evaluate Nutrisync M plus and minus Awaken ST and Urea. Treatments 5-8 mirrored 1-4 plus Urea. The addition of Awaken ST improved yield in comparable treatments in all but 1 treatment. The variety (EGA Gregory) is typically high yielding but low in protein. Conclusions