Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #7 at Duke University Jack Fowler.

Published byDenis Cameron Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #7 at Duke University Jack Fowler."— Presentation transcript:

1 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #7 at Duke University Jack Fowler

2 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Module Test Layout

3 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Duke Wire Samples Analyzed  Xe-CO 2 gas volume u Wire 14 – Production wire with glass joint  Xe-CF 4 -CO 2 gas volume u Wire 19 - Production wire with glass encapsulated joint u Wire 20 - Production wire with polyimide joint u Wire 22 - Production wire with no joint u Wire 23 - Production wire with PEEK joint u Wire 31 – Pre-series wire with no wire joint  None of the wires shown were cleaned prior to installation into chamber Wire analysis Performed at Analytical Instrumentation Facility at North Carolina State University

4 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 14 Glass Wire Joint  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2  Current - 14.8  A  Charge ~ 2.5 to 3.0 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Light deposits of Na and Cl

5 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 19 Glass Encapsulated Wire joint  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Current - 16.6  A  Charge ~ 2.4 to 2.9 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Few deposits

6 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 20 Polyimide Wire Joint  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  No visible change

7 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 14 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2  Glass Wire Joint  Current - 14.8  A  Charge ~ 2.5 to 3.0 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  No deposits

8 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 14 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2  Glass Wire Joint  Current - 14.8  A  Charge ~ 2.5 to 3.0 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr

9 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 14 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2  Glass Wire Joint  Current - 14.8  A  Charge ~ 2.5 to 3.0 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Fine Deposits are Na and Cl

10 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 19 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Glass Encap Wire Joint  Current - 16.6  A  Charge ~ 2.4 to 2.9 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Large pores  Gold etching and removal

11 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 19 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Glass Encap Wire Joint  Current - 16.6  A  Charge ~ 2.4 to 2.9 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Large pores  Gold etching and removal  Notice the loss of surface definition and grain boundaries

12 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 19 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Glass Encap Wire Joint  Current - 16.6  A  Charge ~ 2.4 to 2.9 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Large pores  Gold etching and removal

13 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 19 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Glass Encap Wire Joint  Current - 16.6  A  Charge ~ 2.4 to 2.9 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Large pores  Gold etching and removal

14 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 20 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr Large pores  Gold etching and removal

15 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 20 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Large pores  Gold etching and removal  Again loss of surface definition

16 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 20 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Area show at 2 kV beam energy

17 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 20 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Surface is covered with deposits

18 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 20 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Pores in surface  Faint grain boundaries still present  Deposits are mainly Au

19 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 20 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Discolored region near wire joint ~700  m

20 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 20 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Here is the section where the transition occurs

21 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 20 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Very heavy gold damage  This affect was seen on both sides of the wire joint.

22 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 22 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  No Wire Joint  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Large pores  Notice large regions where it appears that gold surface is uneven, possibly islands removed

23 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 22 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  No Wire Joint  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Large pores  All surfaces appear in the same condition

24 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 22 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  No Wire Joint  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Large pores and islands

25 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 22 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  No Wire Joint  Current - 15.4  A  Charge ~ 2.3 to 2.7 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Large pores

26 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 23 Segment 3  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  PEEK Wire Joint  Current - 7.4  A  Charge ~ 0.8 to 1.0C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Fine deposits  Grain definition is reduced

27 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 23 Segment 3  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  PEEK Wire Joint  Current - 7.4  A  Charge ~ 0.8 to 1.0C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Fine deposits  Grain definition is reduced

28 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 23 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  PEEK Wire Joint  Current - 7.4  A  Charge ~ 0.8 to 1.0C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Fine deposits  Grain definition is reduced

29 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 23 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  PEEK Wire Joint  Current - 7.4  A  Charge ~ 0.8 to 1.0C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Fine deposits  Grain definition is reduced

30 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 31 Segment 4  Wire - thin plated preseries  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Current - 8.9  A  Charge ~ 1.2 to 1.5 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Large pores  Heavy gold damage

31 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 31 Segment 7  Wire - thin plated preseries  This region was visibly darkened during removal  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Current - 8.9  A  Charge ~ 1.2 to 1.5 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Small deposits

32 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Wire 31 Segment 7  Wire - thin plated preseries  This region was visibly darkened during removal  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Current - 8.9  A  Charge ~ 1.2 to 1.5 C/cm  Exposed Time ~ 1680 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~ 15cc/hr  Small deposits of F

33 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire Samples Analyzed  Xe-CO 2 gas volume u Wire 2 – Production wire with polyimide joint  Xe-CF 4 -CO 2 gas volume u Wire 18 - Production wire with no joint u Wire 19 - Production wire with polyimide joint u Wire 39 - Production wire with polyimide joint  None of the wires shown were cleaned prior to installation into chamber Wire analysis Performed at Analytical Instrumentation Facility at North Carolina State University

34 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 2 Segment 1  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.4  A  Charge ~ 3.3 C/cm  Exposed Time – 672 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  C deposits

35 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 2 Segment 1  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.4  A  Charge ~ 3.3 C/cm  Exposed Time – 672 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  C deposits and Pores  Fine white deposits

36 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 2 Segment 4  Gas Volume – Xe-CO 2  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.4  A  Charge ~ 3.3 C/cm  Exposed Time – 672 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  C deposits

37 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 2 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.4  A  Charge ~ 3.3 C/cm  Exposed Time – 672 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  Few pores  Good surface grain definition

38 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 2 Segment 7  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.4  A  Charge ~ 3.3 C/cm  Exposed Time – 672 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  More C deposits than in earlier segments

39 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 2 Segment 7  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.4  A  Charge ~ 3.3 C/cm  Exposed Time – 672 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  More C deposits than in earlier segments  Loss of grain definition from segment 4

40 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 18 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  No Wire Joint  Current – 1.7  A  Charge ~ 2.4 C/cm  Exposed Time – 408 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  Large C deposits

41 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 18 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  No Wire Joint  Current – 1.7  A  Charge ~ 2.4 C/cm  Exposed Time – 408 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  Large C deposits  Some large pores

42 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 18 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  No Wire Joint  Current – 1.7  A  Charge ~ 2.4 C/cm  Exposed Time – 408 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  Some loss of grain definition

43 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 19 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.7  A  Charge ~ 4.0 C/cm  Exposed Time – 672 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  C deposits  Some small pores  Surface is smoother than wire 18

44 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 19 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.7  A  Charge ~ 4.0 C/cm  Exposed Time – 672 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  Slight decrease in grain definition  Some small pores

45 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 19 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.7  A  Charge ~4.0 C/cm  Exposed Time – 672 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  Surface has many small C deposits  Some porosity

46 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 19 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.7  A  Charge ~ 4.0 C/cm  Exposed Time – 672 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  Small pores around grain boundaries  Some porosity

47 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 39 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.7  A  Charge ~ 4.9 C/cm  Exposed Time – 816 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  Surface smooth in appearance  Many large C deposits

48 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 39 Segment 4  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.7  A  Charge ~ 4.9 C/cm  Exposed Time – 816 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  Many C deposits  Loss of grain definition

49 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 39 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.7  A  Charge ~ 4.9 C/cm  Exposed Time – 816 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  Surface smooth in appearance  Large C deposits

50 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP IU Wire 39 Segment 5  Gas Volume - Xe-CO 2 -CF 4  Polyimide Wire Joint  Current – 1.7  A  Charge ~ 4.9 C/cm  Exposed Time – 816 hrs  Target Flow Rate ~15 cc/hr  Surface is smoother  Less grain definition  C deposits

51 May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler, Duke HEP Summary  It is clear that the wire is damaged in Duke wires and the surface has changed in Indiana wires  Wire damage may be more a function of time exposed to gas as opposed to the amount of accumulated charge u Duke wires have > double the exposure time u IU wires have higher accumulated charge  Xe-CO 2 wire only exhibit small pores on surface  Xe-CF 4 -CO 2 wires show some heavy damage, both Au removal and deposits  There is trace fluorine detected on the surface of the wire

Download ppt "May’02, TRT Workshop Jack Fowler – Duke University SEM Analysis of Wire from Aging Test #7 at Duke University Jack Fowler."

Similar presentations

Factors that Affect Gas Pressure

Factors that Affect Gas Pressure
1 Adhesion and Etching of Nickel-Chromium Tiecoat on Adhesiveless Flexible Laminate by Bergstresser, T., Hilburn, R. and Wang, J. Gould Electronics Gould.

1 Adhesion and Etching of Nickel-Chromium Tiecoat on Adhesiveless Flexible Laminate by Bergstresser, T., Hilburn, R. and Wang, J. Gould Electronics Gould.
Focused ion beam (FIB) 1.Overview. 2.Ion source and optics. 3.Ion-solid interaction, damage. 4.Scanning ion beam imaging. ECE 730: Fabrication in the nanoscale:

Focused ion beam (FIB) 1.Overview. 2.Ion source and optics. 3.Ion-solid interaction, damage. 4.Scanning ion beam imaging. ECE 730: Fabrication in the nanoscale:
Effect of Accelerating Voltage on Resolution

Effect of Accelerating Voltage on Resolution
Climate Change: Past, Present and Future. Warm up: 1.Sketch a graph (Global Temperature vs. Time) for the past 20,000 years and predict how climate has.

Climate Change: Past, Present and Future. Warm up: 1.Sketch a graph (Global Temperature vs. Time) for the past 20,000 years and predict how climate has.
Atsuhiko Ochi Kobe University 4/10/2012 10 th RD51 collaboration meeting.

Atsuhiko Ochi Kobe University 4/10/ th RD51 collaboration meeting.
Incandescent Lightbulbs. Introductory Question  An incandescent lightbulb contains some gas with the filament. How would removing the gas affect the.

Incandescent Lightbulbs. Introductory Question  An incandescent lightbulb contains some gas with the filament. How would removing the gas affect the.
Semiconductor manufacturing requires that wafers be exposed to a plasma for more than 1/3 of the manufacturing steps—including etching, deposition, ashing,

Semiconductor manufacturing requires that wafers be exposed to a plasma for more than 1/3 of the manufacturing steps—including etching, deposition, ashing,
FSC-5178 FIGURE 1. PHOTOGRAPHS OF FRONT AND BACK OF SUB-PANEL AFTER SOLDER PASTED WITH SAC305 AND REFLOWED a). Front side of sub-panel b). Back side of.

FSC-5178 FIGURE 1. PHOTOGRAPHS OF FRONT AND BACK OF SUB-PANEL AFTER SOLDER PASTED WITH SAC305 AND REFLOWED a). Front side of sub-panel b). Back side of.
26 September 2000 High Voltage Plates and Capacitors Jack Fowler.

26 September 2000 High Voltage Plates and Capacitors Jack Fowler.
299 Analysis For data: 299step.xlsx, 299.pxp. Summary of 299 1.Nb (15nm)/Al 2 O 3 (15nm Pad;4-0nm wedge)/Co(30nm) 2.Try to etch Nb with CF 4 3.Nb etch.

299 Analysis For data: 299step.xlsx, 299.pxp. Summary of Nb (15nm)/Al 2 O 3 (15nm Pad;4-0nm wedge)/Co(30nm) 2.Try to etch Nb with CF 4 3.Nb etch.
Y. Ueda, M. Fukumoto, H. Kashiwagi, Y. Ohtsuka (Osaka University)

Y. Ueda, M. Fukumoto, H. Kashiwagi, Y. Ohtsuka (Osaka University)
CAMERA MATERIALS TEST CHAMBER Jack Singal 9/17/08 LSST Camera Workshop Turbo pump Optics table scroll pump and LN trap (for roughing A1, A3, and LL)

CAMERA MATERIALS TEST CHAMBER Jack Singal 9/17/08 LSST Camera Workshop Turbo pump Optics table scroll pump and LN trap (for roughing A1, A3, and LL)
X Ray Flouresence Analysis (XRF). XRF X-Ray Fluorescence is used to identify and measure the concentration of elements in a sample X-Ray Fluorescence.

X Ray Flouresence Analysis (XRF). XRF X-Ray Fluorescence is used to identify and measure the concentration of elements in a sample X-Ray Fluorescence.
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics ETCH PROFILES IN SOLID AND POROUS SiO 2  Solid  Porosity = 45 % Pore radius = 10 nm  Porous SiO.

University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics ETCH PROFILES IN SOLID AND POROUS SiO 2  Solid  Porosity = 45 % Pore radius = 10 nm  Porous SiO.
SMAW- Electrodes NCCER Unit 8.

SMAW- Electrodes NCCER Unit 8.
Design and Implementation of VLSI Systems (EN0160) Sherief Reda Division of Engineering, Brown University Spring 2007 [sources: Sedra/Prentice Hall, Saint/McGrawHill,

Design and Implementation of VLSI Systems (EN0160) Sherief Reda Division of Engineering, Brown University Spring 2007 [sources: Sedra/Prentice Hall, Saint/McGrawHill,
Solar Energy Self Shading Glazing by Jon Watts

Solar Energy Self Shading Glazing by Jon Watts
TEM Prep using FIB and Kleindiek Micro-Manipulator General Reminders, Tips and Tricks When in FIB view, work quickly to do what is needed and then freeze.

TEM Prep using FIB and Kleindiek Micro-Manipulator General Reminders, Tips and Tricks When in FIB view, work quickly to do what is needed and then freeze.
26 September 2000 Wire Procurement and Wire Joint Production Jack Fowler.

26 September 2000 Wire Procurement and Wire Joint Production Jack Fowler.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google