Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHorace Newman Modified over 9 years ago
1
Simulating big earthquakes Accessing the inaccessible with models
2
Subduction zone earthquakes Two stories of deformation and stress Pacific Ocean EurasiaNorth America 1: 1995 M8 Jalisco, Mexico quake 2: 2004 M9 Sumatra-Andaman quake
3
North America Pacific Ocean North American Plate Mexico Middle America Trench Pacific Ocean Middle America Trench 0 100 200 kilometers N 4 cm/yr Rivera Plate 1. The M8 Jalisco Earthquake: A natural laboratory for stress-triggering M8 Jalisco Quake
4
Subduction zone Converging tectonic plates North American Plate Mexico Middle America Trench Pacific Ocean Mexico 4 cm/yr North American Plate Middle America Trench 0 100 200 kilometers N Pacific Ocean North American Plate Mexico Rivera Plate Rivera Plate North American Plate oceanic crust continental crust M8 Jalisco Quake
5
Earthquakes Release of built-up tectonic stress Rivera Plate North American Plate cross-section oceanic crust continental crust M8 Jalisco Quake
6
Study site 1995 Jalisco earthquake Rivera Plate North American Plate Mexico Middle America Trench Pacific Ocean Middle America Trench 0 100 200 kilometers N 1995 Feb, GPS sites installed Oct 9, M=8 Dec 11, M=6 GPS site 0.5 m 4 cm/yr North America Pacific Ocean M8 Jalisco Quake
7
Observations Earthquakes close together in both space & time October 9, M=8 December 11, M=6 0 100 200 kilometers 63 days * earthquakes linked together rupture plane M8 Jalisco Quake
8
Storage and release of elastic energy Tectonic stresses load fault Rocks store elastic energy Frictional resistance of fault is overcome Stress-triggering 101: The interaction of earthquakes M8 Jalisco Quake
9
Storage and release of elastic energy Tectonic stresses load fault Rocks store elastic energy Frictional resistance of fault is overcome Stress-triggering 101: The interaction of earthquakes M8 Jalisco Quake
10
Storage and release of elastic energy Tectonic stresses load fault Rocks store elastic energy Frictional resistance of fault is overcome Stress-triggering 101: The interaction of earthquakes M8 Jalisco Quake
11
tectonic stress normal stress friction Storage and release of elastic energy Tectonic stresses load fault Rocks store elastic energy Frictional resistance of fault is overcome Stress-triggering 101: The interaction of earthquakes M8 Jalisco Quake
12
tectonic stress normal stress friction tectonic stress (winch) normal stress (gravity) friction (sandpaper) Storage and release of elastic energy Tectonic stresses load fault Rocks store elastic energy Frictional resistance of fault is overcome Stress-triggering 101: The interaction of earthquakes M8 Jalisco Quake
13
Earthquake coupling Stress release from loads other faults Quake 1 may trigger Quake 2 fault 1 quake 1 fault 2 quake 2 Stress-triggering 101: The interaction of earthquakes M8 Jalisco Quake
14
Earthquake coupling Stress release from an earthquake loads other faults Quake 1 may trigger Quake 2 1 stress transfer friction normal stress 2 tectonic stress normal stress Stress-triggering 101: The interaction of earthquakes M8 Jalisco Quake
15
1 stress transfer friction normal stress 2 tectonic stress normal stress tectonic stress (winch) normal stress (gravity) friction (sandpaper) normal stress (gravity) stress transfer (elastic material) 22 1 Stress-triggering 101: The interaction of earthquakes Earthquake coupling Stress release from an earthquake loads other faults Quake 1 may trigger Quake 2 M8 Jalisco Quake
16
What about the time lag? A good model must also account for the 63-day lag October 9, M=8 December 11, M=6 0 100 200 kilometers 63 days * earthquakes linked together rupture plane lag M8 Jalisco Quake
17
Hypothesis October 9, M=8 0 100 200 kilometers fault stress (from M=8 quake) pore pressure along fault slowly increases after M=8 quake pore pressure (along fault of M=6 quake) triggered M=6 quake + pore pressure: pressure of water in the pores of the rock. definition M8 Jalisco Quake
18
Poroelastic mechanics Physical interaction of rock and pore water saturated rock rock matrix fluid-filled pore 0 –+ pore pressure tension 0 –+ pore pressure compression M8 Jalisco Quake
19
Earthquake mechanics The meaning of and pore pressure tension 0 – + pore pressure tension 0 – + compression 0 – + pore pressure compression 0 – + pore pressure fault M8 Jalisco Quake
20
Rivera plateNorth American plate M = 8 ( t = 0 ) M = 6 ( t = 63 days ) tension compression cross-section of subduction zone pore pressure near M=6 fault 0 –+ t = 63 days fluid flow 0 –+ t = 0 + Conceptual model Earthquake released stress and pore pressure M8 Jalisco Quake
21
* Coulomb stress along fault can change due to fluid flow changing pore pressure Coulomb stress tendency for slip to occur along a fault definition 0 –+ shear stress normal stress pore pressure fault pore pressure shear stress normal stress friction Fault stability: Coulomb stress Combination of stress, pore pressure, and friction M8 Jalisco Quake
22
Fault Stability: Coulomb Stress Experiment apparatus 0 –+ shear stress normal stress water pressure fault shear stress normal stress water pressure fault M8 Jalisco Quake
23
Fault Stability: Coulomb Stress Experiment apparatus normal stress fault water pressure = 0 shear stress = 0 normal stress 0 initial conditions M8 Jalisco Quake
24
Fault Stability: Experiment Earthquake changes Coulomb stress earthquake shear stress normal stress fault M8 Jalisco Quake
25
Fault Stability: Experiment Pore pressure changes Coulomb stress changes earthquake shear stress normal stress fault water pressure excess water pressure induction device M8 Jalisco Quake
26
Fault Stability: Experiment Pore pressure changes Coulomb stress changes shear stress normal stress fault water pressure excess water pressure induction device M8 Jalisco Quake
27
- GPS station 1800 km 1300 km 250 km 220 km oceanic crust continental crust mantle FEM: numerical model; predicts deformation, stress, and pore pressure due to earthquakes. definition Method: Construct deformation models Finite Element Model (FEM) M8 Jalisco Quake
28
M=6 epicenter ( pore pressure initially drops after M8 quake ) 1800 km 1300 km oceanic crust continental crust 10 5 0 -5 -10 pore pressure (kPa) North days after M=8 earthquake: Predicted pore pressure Initial conditions following M8 earthquake M8 Jalisco Quake
29
1800 km 1300 km oceanic crust continental crust 10 5 0 -5 -10 pore pressure (kPa) North days after M=8 earthquake: Predicted pore pressure Gradual recovery to pre-earthquake equilibrium M=6 epicenter ( pore pressure slowly increases after M8 quake ) M8 Jalisco Quake
30
The M=8 earthquake triggered the M=6 earthquake, fluid flow accounts for the delay the M=6 earthquake was a predictable event ! stress (from M=8 quake) pore pressure (along fault of M=6 quake) triggered M=6 quake + Conclusions Recall the hypothesis… M8 Jalisco Quake
31
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 stress (MPa) - GPS station 220 km years after M=8 earthquake The Project Continues Predicting deformation & stress evolution brittle upper crust (stress accumulates) ductile mantle (stresses relax) M8 Jalisco Quake
32
Earthquake coupling Stress release loads mantle Flow relaxes stresses in mantle (silly putty) and transfers stress to fault 1 1 stress transfer friction normal stress 2 tectonic stress normal stress Stress-triggering: Viscoelastic relaxation viscous silly putty (slowly flows & relaxes stress) M8 Jalisco Quake
33
M9 earthquake tsunami Indian Ocean Sumatra India Australia 2. Applying the lessons learned 2004 M9 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake & tsunami M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake
34
Indo-Australian Plate Eurasian Plate 6 cm/yr 9.2 Rupture & deformation 2004 M9 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake & tsunami Dec 26 2004 M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake
35
Indo-Australian Plate Eurasian Plate 6 cm/yr 9.2 Sumatra-Andaman FEM 1) Simulate poroelastic stress-triggering 6 cm/yr 8.79.2 Mar 28 2005 Dec 26 2004 M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake
36
Are the aftershocks predictable in space and time? not yet, but…we are working on it! Coupling the 2004 & 2005 quakes What if models in place prior to these events? M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake
37
up down Indo-Australian Plate Eurasian Plate 6 cm/yr 9.2 Dec 26 2004 Sumatra-Andaman FEM 2) Simulate seafloor deformation tsunamigenesis M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake
38
Predicting seafloor deformation Changes overlying water column seafloor ocean surface cross-section water column Indo-Aust Plate Eurasian Plate fault M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake
39
Predicting seafloor deformation Changes overlying water column seafloor ocean surface cross-section water column Indo-Aust Plate Eurasian Plate fault M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake
40
seafloor cross-section wave propagation earthquake deformation India and Sri Lanka Sumatra & Thailand Predicting seafloor deformation Drives tsunami propagation models M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake
41
seafloor cross-section wave propagation Sumatra & Thailand India and Sri Lanka M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake Predicting seafloor deformation Drives tsunami propagation models
42
seafloor cross-section earthquake deformation cross-section ocean surface wave propagation: velocity is a function of depth slow fastfast slow M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake Predicting seafloor deformation Drives tsunami propagation models run-up
43
seafloor cross-section earthquake deformation cross-section wave propagation: velocity is a function of depth slow fastfast slow M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake Predicting seafloor deformation Drives tsunami propagation models run-up
44
In progress: Virtual Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake
45
In progress: Virtual Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone
46
M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake In progress: Virtual Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone seafloor deformation
47
M9 Sumatra-Andaman Quake In progress: Virtual Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone seafloor deformation Imagine the possibilities… deformation predictions (tsunami sources) stress evolution predictions ultimately, earthquake predictions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.