1. Romania National Environmental Guard Regional Commissariat Cluj Dipl/.eng. Mihaela BEU -regional commissar-

2. Main performance parameters measured No of inspections/inspector No of penalties/inspector Amount of penalties/inspector No of complaints/inspector

3. Measurement NEG National database on intranet, containing inspection reports and penalties reports Once input into database, even daily reports on the parameters can be issued

4. Using of parameters Indicators can be vary one year from another, depending on established scope Each indicator is used in a defined scope, for meeting certain objectives and goals These parameters are not relevant for the entire activity of one inspectorate, but selecting them according to the scope, they can be used for obtaining better results

5. Example The inspections situation in 2005 in comparison with 2006, was scoping a more efficient time use and the inspections at as many as possible companies By applying this parameter, it was meant to have a more correctly time allocation Still this parameter should be used with precaution, in order not to diminish the quality of inspections in the favor of their number. No of controlled companies Routine inspecti ons No of inspections Non routine inspections

6. Results The time allocated for inspection increased in some inspectorates up to 91% in comparison with 60—70 % (as it was initially planned) N0N0 Regional Commissariat Percentage Total Type A companies Type B companies 1ARGES83.59%106.70%79.47% 2BUCURESTI86.03%99.59%82.26% 3CLUJ81.88%87.94%80.61% 4GALATI85.37%83.07%85.80% 5SIBIU83.48%66.01%87.34% 6SUCEAVA80.64%79.74%80.94% 7TIMIS91.58%75.18%93.51% TOTAL85.94%85.40%86.05%

7. Example By increasing the number of penalties, the objective was to maximize the exigency in cases of legislation violation No. of penalties No. of warnings

8. There are issued trimestrial monitoring results of some parameters According to concrete tasks, the inspectorates are evaluated in order to evaluate the degree of fulfilling these tasks (for example, in 2007, Regional Commissariat Cluj monitored the fulfilling of: thematic controls, planned inspections, other reports or information requested). Monitoring of Regional Commissariat Cluj activity – done at 9.03.07 BHBNCJMSMSJ Average inspections number/inspector / analyzed time interval Average penalties number / inspector / analyzed time interval252017 2318 Average of penalties amount [thousands of ROL] / inspector / analyzed time interval 5.82.12.51.85.22.2 Thematic control on closing old hospital crematories for sanitary waste*1562080305559 Thematic control on salubrity110111 Thematic control on vehicles gases emission111001 Thematic control on end of life vehicles111110 Information on IPPC controls111110 Report on county environmental data101000 Average inspections number/inspector / analyzed time interval111111

9. Classification Following the monitoring of parameters, classifications are issued Classification according to indicators CJ BHCJ BNCJ CJ MMCJ SMCJ SJ Average inspections number/inspector / analyzed time interval642153 Average penalties number / inspector / analyzed time interval624253 Average of penalties amount [thousands of ROL] / inspector / analyzed time interval 615234 Thematic control on closing old hospital crematories for sanitary waste*110111 Thematic control on salubrity111001 Thematic control on vehicles gases emission111111 Thematic control on end of life vehicles111110 Information on IPPC controls101000 Report on county environmental data111111 TOTAL 24121691714

10. Other Technical parameters No of accidental pollutions No of environmental regulated enterprises/no of existent enterprises No of complaints/inspector No of fulfilled measures stipulated in negotiated process or action plans/no of unfulfilled measures

11. Other parameters –focused on increasing of knowledge/skills of inspectors No of trainings attended by inspectors No of inspectors knowing foreigner language No of press release/inspector The feed back coming from the public and enterprises

12. The correlation with concrete results regarding environmental improvement In the last period it is an attempt to link the indicators for inspection activity with concrete results (i.e. monitoring data taken from EPAs monitoring databases Even if a straight correlation rarely exists, and a direct link of inspection parameters with evolution of one pollutant or another is a very hard to be established, this kinds of analyses should be more and more be taken into account, as a prove of inspection effectiveness and its final aim of improving the quality of environment

13. Thank you for your attention!