1. www. culturalcognition.net Lab Meeting # 9073 11.11.15

2. www. culturalcognition.net Lab Meeting # 9073 11.11.15 1.Roll call/intros 2.CRT_2.0 & OCSI _2.0 3.Climate scientist worldview data 4.“Living coastlines” #scicomm in SE Fla 5.EBSFI

3. Climate scientist worldview data

4. Hierarchy Egalitarianism Abortion procedure Risk Perception Key Low Risk High Risk Individualism Communitarianism Environment: climate, nuclear Guns/Gun Control HPV Vaccination Gays military/gay parenting Environment: climate, nuclear hierarchical individualists hierarchical communitarians egalitarian communitariansegalitarian individualists Cultural Cognition Worldviews cats/stupid birds

5. www. culturalcognition.net Lab Meeting # 9073 11.11.15 1.Roll call/intros 2.CRT_2.0 & OCSI _2.0 3.Climate scientist worldview data 4.“Living coastlines” #scicomm in SE Fla 5.EBSFI

6. 1.Study 1 recap 2.Now what Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative

7. “Science Curiosity Index” (SCI)

8. 0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 probability of pro-curiosity response -3-20123 science curiosity “Science Curiosity Index” (SCI) Not at all A little but not closely closely very closely BSCIENCE Science Curiosity Index (SCI)

9. YIF Clip: Origins of color vision

10. YIF Clip: Engagement

11. The “missing audience hypothesis... ” Engagement “Natural audience hypothesis” “Missing audience hypothesis” Science Curiosity ?

12. Latent class analysis

13. Who are these guys???????!!!!!

14. Hierarchy Egalitarianism Abortion procedure Risk Perception Key Low Risk High Risk Individualism Communitarianism Environment: climate, nuclear Guns/Gun Control HPV Vaccination Gays military/gay parenting Environment: climate, nuclear Cultural Cognition Worldviews cats/stupid birds

15. Hierarchy Egalitarianism Individualism Communitarianism Environment: climate, nuclear Cultural Cognition Worldviews Risk Perception Key Low Risk High Risk Guns/Gun Control

16. Dalets are pro-science/technology

17. Kahan, D.M. Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem. Advances in Political Psychology 36, 1-43 (2015). confounding & Evolution-science communication measurement problem: What we know Who we are

18. Colored bars reflect 0.95 level of confidence Kahan, D.M. Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem. Advances in Political Psychology 36, 1-43 (2015). unconfounding & Evolution-science communication measurement problem: What we know Who we are

19. Evolution-science measurement problem: What we know Who we are entangling &

20. Evolution-science measurement problem: How to disentangle What we know Who we are from

21. Evolution-science measurement problem: How to disentangle What we know Who we are from ?

22. 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1st16th50th84th99th 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1st16th50th84th99th 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1st16th50th84th99th Evolution believer Evolutiondisbeliever Science Curiosity Index (percentile) Evolution believer Evolutiondisbeliever Odinary Science Intelligence (percentile) 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1st16th50th84th99th Prob. of agreeing Evolution believer Evolutiondisbeliever Odinary Science Intelligence (percentile) Evolution believer Evolutiondisbeliever Science Curiosity Index (percentile) Request full documentary probability “It seemed like the documentary supplied strong evidence of how humans acquired color vision.” Colored bars reflect 0.95 level of confidence probability Prob. of agreeing Evolution disbelievers....

23. Pakistani Dr Kentucky Farmer Cogntive dualism

24. Krista....

25. Request full show: Evolution “believers” vs. “disbelievers” Evolution believer Evolution disbeliever Science Curiosity Evolution believer Evolution disbeliever Science Curiosity (percentie) Logistic regression. Colored bars reflect 0.95 level of confidence probability of requesting full show Krista! Aidan

26. 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1st16th50th84th99th 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1st16th50th84th99th 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1st16th50th84th99th Evolution believer Evolutiondisbeliever Science Curiosity Index (percentile) Evolution believer Evolutiondisbeliever Odinary Science Intelligence (percentile) 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1st16th50th84th99th Prob. of agreeing Evolution believer Evolutiondisbeliever Odinary Science Intelligence (percentile) Evolution believer Evolutiondisbeliever Science Curiosity Index (percentile) Request full documentary probability “It seemed like the documentary supplied strong evidence of how humans acquired color vision.” Colored bars reflect 0.95 level of confidence probability Prob. of agreeing Evolution disbelievers.... Krista! Aidan

27. Prob. of requesting full documentary Satisfying the curiosity of all the citizens of the liberal republic of science! The ESFI disentanglement project: (including color-vision challenged monkeys!)

28. 1.Study 1 recap 2.Now what Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative

29. 1.Study 1 recap 2.Now what Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative ********

30. 1.Study 1 recap 2.Now what Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative * “you tell me!” *

31. The ESCI concept Kahan, D.M. Making Climate-Science Communication Evidence-Based—All the Way Down. in Culture, Politics and Climate Change (ed. M. Boykoff & D. Crow) 203-220 (Routledge Press, New York, 2014).

32. The ESCI concept

33. The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: #Scicomm Researcher:

34. The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher:

35. The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno.

36. The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me!

37. The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me! #Scicomm Professional:

38. The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me! #Scicomm Professional: Well,

39. The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me! #Scicomm Professional: Well, this might be analogous to what you did in the lab.

40. The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me! #Scicomm Professional: Well, this might be analogous to what you did in the lab. #Scicomm Researcher: Cool!

41. The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me! #Scicomm Professional: Well, this might be analogous to what you did in the lab. #Scicomm Researcher: Cool! Try it & I’ll measure!

42. The ESCI concept #scicomm professional #scicomm researcher The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me! #Scicomm Professional: Well, this might be analogous to what you did in the lab. #Scicomm Researcher: Cool! Try it & I’ll measure!

43. 1.Study 1 recap 2.Now what Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative * “you tell me!” *

44. 1.Study 1 recap 2.Now what Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative * “you tell me!” * More analyses *

45. 1.Study 1 recap 2.Now what Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative * “you tell me!” * More analyses * MA experiments (spring Annenberg) *

46. 1.Study 1 recap 2.Now what Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative * “you tell me!” * More analyses * MA experiments (spring Annenberg) * SCI_1.0 validation, pt 2