Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCorey Owen Modified over 8 years ago
1
Inherited Thrombophilia Testing as Observed at a Reference Laboratory Brian Jackson, MD, MS Medical Director of Informatics
2
Introduction Pathologic thrombosis is common -Many patients are worked up for inherited thrombophilia Testing for inherited thrombophilia is a complex and changing area of the laboratory Some evidence exists that physicians have not kept on changes in this area
3
CAP Consensus Conference XXXVI: Diagnostic Issues in Thrombophilia 2nd generation APC resistance assays are equivalent to V Leiden direct mutation detection. For AT and Protein C and S, functional assays (and Protein S free Ag) are the appropriate primary tests. -Total AT, Protein C and S may have limited role Overall, inherited thrombophilia tests may be useful in determining etiology and family counseling, but have a limited role in influencing treatment.
4
Suggested Ordering Algorithm Test for most common defect (V Leiden by functional assay) Positive Result? Test for next most common (Prothrombin) Stop Yes Etc. No
5
Key Questions To what extent is ordering consistent with: -Recommendations of the CAP Consensus Conference? -ARUP’s suggested ordering algorithm?
6
ARUP Overview Reference laboratory Owned by University of Utah Several hundred hospital clients nationwide Data warehouse going back to 1997 -Test orders and results -Age and sex of patients -No other clinical information
7
Datamining: Potential Biases ARUP client base modestly skewed toward academic medical centers Only have data on tests performed at ARUP, not those performed by our clients in-house -Volumes are biased toward the most esoteric tests
8
Test orders analyzed Dec 03-Nov04 V Leiden -Direct mutation and APC resistance Prothrombin mutation detection Antithrombin -Functional and total antigen Protein C -Functional and total antigen Protein S -Functional, free Ag and total Ag
9
If these tests were used optimally, what ordering patterns would we expect to see? Volume distributions would reflect prevalence -V Leiden orders > Prothrombin orders > etc. Functional V Leiden orders >> DNA test Functional AT orders >> Total AT Ag Functional Prot. C orders >> Total C Ag Function Prot S + Free Ag >> Total S Ag
10
Test Volumes by Category
11
Test Volume Ratios by Category
12
Antithrombin Orders by Specimen
13
Protein C Orders by Specimen
14
Protein S Orders by Specimen
15
Specific Conclusions Order volumes do not follow disease prevalence -Protein C and Protein S ordered too much relative to V Leiden -Prothrombin not ordered often enough relative to Prot C, S, AT Second-line tests for Protein S, Protein C and Antithrombin are ordered about as often as first-line tests
16
General Conclusions On average, diagnosis process for hereditary thrombophilia is inefficient and possibly unreliable Laboratories need better mechanisms to support appropriate test ordering
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.