1. Informing Program Improvements in the Classroom at: Cosumnes River College Dr. Norv Wellsfry Professor, CIS and Accounting

2. Core Indicator Workshop Using VTEA Core Indicators in Program Review Vocational & Technical Education Act (VTEA) Dr. Norv Wellsfry

3. Utilizing the Data Comparison to state-adjusted levels –Trends over time for your college –By program, special population, Tech Prep Workshops, Committees & Faculty Information –Circulate to faculty for their use & input Factor in allocation decision-making for Local Plans –Supplement MIS data with your own knowledge and follow-up of students

4. Local Program Review The GOOD The BAD The UGLY

5. Cosumnes River College Program Review Data Program Data used for Occupational Program Review Process by Faculty Data Source is Statewide Core Indicator Data – VTEA Information provided: –Longitudinal –Comparative –Graphic

6. Cosumnes River College Program Performance Profile Computer Information Science OVERALL PERFORMANCE YearEnrollmentFemaleFemale % Special Populations* Special Pop % 1998-99 7,6864,05352.7%4,06352.9% 1999-00 8,6914,46751.4%3,99546.0% 2000-01 9,4914,68649.4%4,46247.0% *Duplicate enrollment

7. Cosumnes River College Program Performance Profile Computer Information Science CORE STANDARD 1: Skill Attainment YearStandard Statewide Percentage District Percentag e Program Percentage Difference from Standard Difference from State Average Duplicated Enrollments 1996-97 76.51%67.6%73.0%77.5%1.0%9.9% 5,383 1997-98 76.51%67.6%73.1%76.1%-0.4%8.5% 7,083 1998-99 76.51%68.0%72.9%74.0%-2.5%6.0% 7,686 1999-00 76.51%67.4%73.3%74.2%-2.3%6.8% 8,691 2000-01 76.76%67.6%73.4%73.9%-2.9%6.3% 9,491

8. Cosumnes River College Program Performance Profile Computer Information Science

9. CORE STANDARD 3A: Placement and Retention in Employment) (Percent of completers and leavers who were employed in one of the four quarters following the cohort year in UI covered employment, the Federal Government, the Military, or enrolled at a UC or CSU campus YearStandard Statewide Percentage District Percentage Program Percentage Difference from Standard Difference from State Average Completers & Leavers 1996- 97 82.69%85.0%78.0%76.0%-6.7%-9.0%17 1997- 98 82.69%82.0%87.0%86.0%3.3%4.0%66 1998- 99 82.69%81.0%83.0%86.0%3.3%5.0%127 1999- 00 82.69%81.0%88.0%86.0%3.3%5.0%66

10. Cosumnes River College Program Performance Profile Computer Information Science

11. CORE STANDARD 3B: Retention YearStandard Statewide Percentage District Percentage Program Percentage Difference from Standard Difference from State Average Number Retained 1996-97 82.40%80.7%84.2%81.8%-0.6%1.1%11 1997-98 82.40%81.5%82.5%80.0%-2.4%-1.5%32 1998-99 82.40%82.5%88.4%91.3%8.9%8.8%73 1999-00 82.40%81.1%82.1%84.1%1.7%3.0%37

12. Cosumnes River College Program Performance Profile Computer Information Science