Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCori Bryan Modified over 9 years ago
1
14 January 20161 Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPIC data reduction Piskunov & Valenti 2002, A&A 385, 1095
2
14 January 20162 Echelle spectrum image looks strange … Spectral orders Spectral line
3
Data reduction concept Complex data layout requires in addition to the usual CCD calibrations: Spectral order localization Extracting 2D data into a sequence of 1D spectra Wavelength calibration Blaze function correction 14 January 20163
4
4 To performed data reduction we need calibration data Bias (shutter closed, 0-time exposures) Flat field (uniform source, short exposures) Dark current (shutter closed, different exposures) Order tracing (flat field with short slit) Wavelength map (emission line source, short exposures) Blaze calibration (flat field or a star with minimum sp. lines)
5
14 January 20165 CCD data reduction in one expression The intensity is given by: s – signal in science exposure b – bias level f – flat field signal g – gain (e - /ADU) d – dark current signal per unit time t – exposure times
6
14 January 20166 The problem is the errors: If f is close to b, the S/N is determined by the S/N of the flat field!!!
7
14 January 20167 Complete data reduction sequence 1. Create master bias and master flat 2. Trace spectral orders 3. Normalize master flat 4. Extract wavelength calibrations 5. Extract science spectra (optimal extraction) 6. Fit the continuum 7. Construct the wavelength solution
8
14 January 20168 Creating master bias and master flat The goal is to replace the actual calibration data with a model which is free of random noise but carries all the systematic signatures. S/N of a master must be much larger than the S/N in science frames!!! Main issue: getting rid of random errors, e.g. cosmic ray hits Method : filtering within a frame or across a stack of frames Cross-check between groups of calibration frames
9
14 January 20169 Example of constructing master flat
10
14 January 201610 Stack of individual flats (fragments)
11
14 January 201611 6 times larger vertical scale Individual flats with master flat subtracted
12
14 January 201612 Flat field Fragment of a master flat field
13
14 January 201613 Order tracing
14
14 January 201614 Order tracing (2)
15
14 January 201615 Wavelength calibration Pixel number Order number 2D polynomial Emission line spectrum (ThAr) with known laboratory wavelengths
16
14 January 201616 Wavelength solution and the PSF 1.Why the Gaussian misses the bulk of points? 2.Why do you see so much scatter? Line analysis for wavelength solution for ESO UVES spectrometer. Points show measured lines (scaled). Blue line shows best Gaussian fit.
17
14 January 201617 Slit function decomposition Idealized model : Image on the CCD is a sequence of monochromatic images of the entrance slit sampled with detector pixels Watershed pattern is due misalignment between spectral order and detector raws.
18
14 January 201618 Normalizing flat field Original flat Model flat “Spectrum” Normalized flat (data/model)
19
14 January 201619 Extracting science spectrum Extraction of science spectrum: -Simple summation -Gaussian fit to the slit function -Optimal extraction
20
14 January 201620 Continuum fit Blaze function is a good start:
21
14 January 201621 Fringing Accurate fringing removal requires slit illumination by the FF and by the science object to be identical Wide flat Narrow flat Science spectrum
22
14 January 201622 Exam Written exam on Thursday, March 14 th, starting 9am sharp Oral exam: book time with me
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.