Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Between 1985 and 1990 more than half a dozen publications claimed we were wrong.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Between 1985 and 1990 more than half a dozen publications claimed we were wrong."— Presentation transcript:

1 Between 1985 and 1990 more than half a dozen publications claimed we were wrong

2 1

3 image at: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Endohedral_fu... commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Endohedral_fu...

4 2

5 One can tile a flat floor with squares

6

7 And one can tile a flat floor with hexagons

8 But one cannot tile a flat floor with pentagons

9 David Jones pseudonym of Daedalus in the New Scientist (1966)

10 A sheet of hexagons no matter how large can only close if there are exactly 12 pentagons interspersed

11 But with pentagons…..

12 There is also a problem when you try to tile a flat surface with hexagons around a pentagon

13 But if we allow curvature

14 And add some more pentagons

15 We find that with 12 pentagons the network closes into a cage

16 © The Pentagon Isolation Rule (PIR) Now if 12 pentagons are needed to close a cage 60 carbon atoms are needed if adjacent pentagons areto be avoided we know adjacent pentagons are bad news from our Organic Chemistry

17 © Then we realised it was the same pattern as football So how could it be wrong?

18 3

19 Then while building models like this little boy

20 I guessed that C 62, C 64, C 66 and C 68 cannot close unless some pentagons are adjacent but we knew that C 70 CAN! This was proven mathematically by Schmalz et al in Galveston

21

22 C 70 The cage solution explained why 60 and 70 were both special

23 4

24 Then again while playing around with models like this little boy

25 C 28 should be special - a tetravalent “Superatom” atom H W Kroto, Nature, 329, 529 (1987) Polaroid image of the first molecular model of C 28

26 Mass spectrum of laser vapourised graphite (Rice 1985) C 28

27 Ti @ C 28 Ti

28 U@C 28 Paul Dunk and Alan Marshall U

29 5

30

31 The first giant fullerene C 240 with Ken McKay Nature 1988

32 C 540 made by Ken McKay

33

34

35

36 C 60 C 240 C 540 C 960 The Giant Fullerenes with Ken McKay Nature 331, 328 (1988) Sussex NNC

37

38

39

40 http://www.orchidpalms.com/polyhedra/acrohedra/nearmiss/jsmn.htm

41 C 28 Sussex NNC

42 Exxon Data Cox et al JACS 110 1588 (1988) Sussex NNC Assignment

43 ©

44 The Pentagon Isolation Rule (PIR)

45 Sussex NNC Rice

46 Sussex NNC

47 After C 60 the next fullerene which can have non abutting pentagons is C 70

48 If C 60 is a cage

49 then C 70 MUST be the next magic number

50 If C 60 is a cage then C 70 MUST be the next magic number Pentagon Isolation Rule prediction Kroto 1986 and Schmalz et al 1986

51 © So… C 60 is the smallest cage that can avoid abutting pentagons

52

53 But if we do not constrain to a flat surface and allow the network to curveC

54

55

56 David Jones in a fun article published under the pseudonym of Daedalus in the New Scientist (1966) pointed out that a sheet of hexagons no matter how large could only close if there were exactly 12 pentagons interspersed

57 © The Pentagon Isolation Rule (PIR) C 60 is the smallest fullerene that can avoid abutting pentagons

58 Sussex NNC C 24

59 Sussex NNC C 20

60 Sussex NNC It is not possible to make a C 22 cage

61 NB – Paquette’s Group had synthesised Dodecahedrane C 20 H 20 in 1982, three years before the discovery of C 60

62 With hindsight C 20 H 20 can be recognised as the fully hydrogenated derivative of C 20 the smallest possible and almost certainly least stable fullerene

63 With hindsight C 20 H 20 can be recognised as the fully hydrogenated derivative of C 20 the smallest possible and least stable fullerene

64 C 50 Cl 10 was isolated in 2004

65

66 C 11 + 4n+2 rule (4n+3)-1 rule yields 11, 15, 19, 23 C 15 + C 19 + C 23 +

67 C 28 ”superatom” analogue of sp 3 carbon atom Suggests T d C 28 H 4 Nature 329 529 (1987) Support U @ C 28 U tetravalent (Smalley and coworkers) C 28 H 4 Sussex NNC

68 Kroto and Walton Chem Phys Letts 1993 C 24 H 12

69 C 32 H 2

70 C 36 H 12

71 C 50 H 10 predicted to be stable 1993

72 Sussex NNC The Oddfellas ?

73 C 20 ? Sussex NNC

74 C 20 ? Sussex NNC

75 The Multiplet Pentagon Isolation Rule

76 Sussex NNC

77

78 NB – Paquette’s Group had synthesised Dodecahedrane C 20 H 20 in 1982, three years before the discovery of C 60 With hindsight C 20 H 20 can be recognised as the fully hydrogenated derivative of C 20 the smallest possible and least stable fullerene

79 NB – Paquette’s Group had synthesised Dodecahedrane C 20 H 20 in 1982, three years before the discovery of C 60 With hindsight C 20 H 20 can be recognised as the fully hydrogenated derivative of C 20 the smallest possible and least stable fullerene

80 Sussex NNC

81 Moses Gomberg’s Free Radical (1901) triphenyl methyl CPh 3 -CPh 3 ⇄. CPh 3 +. CPh 3

82 C 28 H 4

83 C 50 H 10

84

85

86 Sussex NNC Rice

87 Sussex NNC

88 C 28 H 4

89 Exxon Data Cox et al JACS 110 1588 (1988) Sussex NNC Assignment

90 BuckyWorld ©

91 Sussex NNC


Download ppt "Between 1985 and 1990 more than half a dozen publications claimed we were wrong."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google